Practicalities of community-led continuous water quality monitoring: lessons from Taiwan and UK pilots

被引:0
作者
Starkey, Eleanor [1 ,7 ]
Jones, Amy [2 ]
Ochoa-Rodriguez, Susana [3 ]
Mahajan, Sachit [4 ]
Wei, Chi-Ling [5 ]
Chen, Pei-Chun [5 ]
Liu, Shau-Yuan [6 ]
Wang, Li-Pen [5 ]
Walsh, Claire L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Sch Engn, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
[2] Water Res Ctr Ltd, Swindon, Wilts, England
[3] RainPlusPlus Ltd, Derby, England
[4] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Computat Social Sci, Zurich, Switzerland
[5] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Taipei, Taiwan
[6] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Biomechatron Engn, Taipei, Taiwan
[7] Northumbria Univ, Dept Geog & Environm Sci, Newcastleupon Tyne, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
water quality; continuous monitoring; community-based monitoring; citizen science; practicalities; co-design; low-cost sensors; freshwater; CITIZEN SCIENCE;
D O I
10.3389/fenvs.2024.1371048
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Freshwater pollution is a global challenge that citizens recognise as unacceptable, despite professional efforts to monitor, manage, and regulate it. Water quality is difficult to observe at high spatial and temporal resolutions; it is costly and typically requires trained specialists in the field and in laboratories. However, the rise in citizen science monitoring has generated opportunities to overcome many barriers and fill data gaps. Citizens want access to actionable water quality information that can provide early warnings and drive change. Our bibliographic analysis emphasises that citizen science is rarely paired with the use of continuous sensors, and many monitoring schemes involving the public are unable to offer the detail required. This study has explored the practicalities and competencies associated with community-led (near) continuous water quality monitoring (CWQM), and has generated an extensive checklist containing technical, social, economic, and wider responsibilities that stakeholders should consider. The "UpStream" project has provided a testbed for this exploratory work and the development and deployment of the "WaterBox" CWQM device. Case studies from the UK and Taiwan, where community-led CWQM programmes have been piloted, have provided novel methodological insights. Lessons learnt have enabled researchers to determine whether, and to what extent, community-led CWQM is achievable in practice. Results confirm that 75% of the practicalities observed fall under the "technical" category, despite offering a social and inclusive methodology. Through observational work, it was found that only 34% of the 104 practicalities were led by community groups and community champions. Communities require significant support owing to the sheer number of technical barriers, although some of this could be provided by skilled community champions. These findings have surfaced despite the WaterBox equipment being open, accessible, cost-effective, and adaptable. Unless support is in place and/or technology significantly evolves to reduce the number of challenges, it is unlikely that communities will lead and take full ownership of CWQM programmes. Despite this, the generation of site-specific CWQM data are welcomed by citizens, who can co-design schemes, interpret trends and offer valuable local information that trained scientists cannot achieve alone. These transferable findings are relevant to monitoring initiatives across the environmental sector.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Smart River Monitoring Using Wireless Sensor Networks [J].
Adu-Manu, Kofi Sarpong ;
Katsriku, Ferdinand Apietu ;
Abdulai, Jamal-Deen ;
Engmann, Felicia .
WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS & MOBILE COMPUTING, 2020, 2020
[2]   Accuracy of long-term volunteer water monitoring data: A multiscale analysis from a statewide citizen science program [J].
Albus, Kelly Hibbeler ;
Thompson, Ruthanne ;
Mitchell, Forrest ;
Kennedy, James ;
Ponette-Gonzalez, Alexandra G. .
PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (01)
[3]  
Alemu A.N., 2023, Natural Hazards Research, V3, P395, DOI [10.1016/j.nhres.2023.05.002, DOI 10.1016/J.NHRES.2023.05.002]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, A Snapshot of the Worlds Water Quality: Towards a Global Assessment
[5]   Participatory research to monitor lake water pollution [J].
Aronoff, Rachel ;
Dussuet, Anna ;
Erismann, Roger ;
Erismann, Shannon ;
Patiny, Luc ;
Vivar-Rios, Carlos .
ECOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS AND EVIDENCE, 2021, 2 (03)
[6]   Citizen science in Lebanona - a case study for groundwater quality monitoring [J].
Baalbaki, Rima ;
Ahmad, Serine Haidar ;
Kays, Wassim ;
Talhouk, Salma N. ;
Saliba, Najat A. ;
Al-Hindi, Mahmoud .
ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2019, 6 (02)
[7]   Citizen Science for Water Quality Monitoring in the Meki River, Ethiopia: Quality Assurance and Comparison with Conventional Methods [J].
Babiso, Wudinesh Zawuga ;
Ayano, Kinfe Kassa ;
Haile, Alemseged Tamiru ;
Keche, Demissie Dawana ;
Acharya, Kishor ;
Werner, David .
WATER, 2023, 15 (02)
[8]   Citizen Science Impact on Environmental Monitoring towards SDGs Indicators: The CASE of SIMILE Project [J].
Biraghi, Carlo Andrea ;
Carrion, Daniela ;
Brovelli, Maria Antonia .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (13)
[9]   Citizen Science Monitoring for Sustainable Development Goal Indicator 6.3.2 in England and Zambia [J].
Bishop, Isabel J. ;
Warner, Stuart ;
van Noordwijk, Toos C. G. E. ;
Nyoni, Frank C. ;
Loiselle, Steven .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (24) :1-15
[10]   Developing Water Leaders as Catalysts for Change: The Nebraska Water Leaders Academy [J].
Burbach, Mark E. ;
Reimers-Hild, Connie .
JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY WATER RESEARCH & EDUCATION, 2019, 167 (01) :6-22