Outcomes of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps-Insights from western India

被引:2
作者
Sundaram, Sridhar [1 ]
Patil, Gaurav Kumar [2 ]
Jain, Aadish Kumar [1 ]
Dalal, Ankit [2 ]
Patil, Prachi [1 ]
Mehta, Shaesta [1 ]
Maydeo, Amit [2 ]
机构
[1] Homi Bhabha Natl Inst, Tata Mem Hosp, Dept Digest Dis & Clin Nutr, Mumbai 400012, India
[2] Sir HN Reliance Fdn Hosp, Inst Gastrosci, Mumbai 400004, India
关键词
Colonic polyps; En bloc resection; Outcomes; Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection; SUBMUCOSAL INJECTION; EMR; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s12664-024-01661-8
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionUnderwater endoscopic mucosal resection (uEMR) represents an alternative to conventional EMR for resection of sessile colorectal polyps. We aimed at assessing the efficacy and safety of uEMR for sessile colorectal polyps.MethodsA retrospective analysis of endoscopy database was done for patients who underwent uEMR for sessile colorectal polyps more than 10 mm in size without any features of sub-mucosal invasion from two tertiary care centres in western India between January 2021 and June 2023. Exclusion criteria were other modes of endoscopic resection. Primary outcome was rate of en bloc resection. Secondary outcomes were complete resection rate, adverse events and recurrence rate.ResultsDuring the study period, 159 patients with 261 lesions met the study inclusion. Mean lesion size was 1.935 +/- 0.71 cm with most lesion located in the rectum (75, 28.73%) followed by sigmoid colon (69, 26.43%). Most lesions had a Paris 0-Is morphology (192, 73.56%). Japan NBI Expert Team (JNET) IIa pattern was seen on narrow band imaging (NBI) in 221 (84.67%) lesions. Complete resection was achieved in 98.46% lesions (257/261). En bloc resection was achieved in 91.82% (236/257) lesions. Complications were seen in 6.8%, all of which were managed endoscopically. Recurrence was seen in 3.1% of polyps on follow-up.ConclusionuEMR is a safe and efficacious technique for endoscopic resection for sessile colorectal polyps with high rates of en bloc resection for polyps more than 10 mm size.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 87
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[21]  
Spadaccini M., 2019, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V89, P4
[22]   Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Sundaram, Sridhar ;
Seth, Vishal ;
Jearth, Vaneet ;
Giri, Suprabhat .
REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS, 2023, 115 (05) :225-233
[23]   Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal lesions [J].
Uedo, Noriya ;
Nemeth, Artur ;
Johansson, Gabriele Wurm ;
Toth, Ervin ;
Thorlacius, Henrik .
ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 47 (02) :172-174
[24]   Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal neoplasia is easily learned, efficacious, and safe [J].
Wang, Andrew Y. ;
Flynn, Mary M. ;
Patrie, James T. ;
Cox, Dawn G. ;
Bleibel, Wissam ;
Mann, James A. ;
Sauer, Bryan G. ;
Shami, Vanessa M. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 28 (04) :1348-1354
[25]   Comparison of Underwater vs Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Intermediate-Size Colorectal Polyps [J].
Yamashina, Takeshi ;
Uedo, Noriya ;
Akasaka, Tomofumi ;
Iwatsubo, Taro ;
Nakatani, Yasuki ;
Akamatsu, Takuji ;
Kawamura, Takuji ;
Takeuchi, Yoji ;
Fujii, Shigehiko ;
Kusaka, Toshihiro ;
Shimokawa, Toshio .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 157 (02) :451-+