Repeatability of Subjective Refraction in Different Age Groups

被引:5
作者
Carpena-Torres, Carlos [1 ]
Batres, Laura [1 ]
Serramito, Maria [1 ]
Carracedo, Gonzalo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Fac Opt & Optometry, Dept Optometry & Vis, Ocupharm Res Grp, C Arcos Jalon 118, Madrid 28037, Spain
关键词
repeatability; subjective refraction; age; myopia; hyperopia; astigmatism; PRECISION;
D O I
10.3390/photonics11070634
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the inter-examiner repeatability of subjective refraction across diverse age cohorts, an aspect not previously investigated. Methods: A cross-sectional, randomized study enrolled 86 participants (mean age: 37.0 +/- 18.0 years), distributed into three groups: youth, non-presbyopic adults, and presbyopic adults. Each participant underwent three subjective refractions by three different optometrists on separate days. Repeatability analysis encompassed all refractive variables (M, J0, and J45). Results: There were no significant differences between optometrists in all refractive variables for either the overall sample or across age groups (p >= 0.05). Additionally, no correlation was found between participants' age and the mean difference in refractive variables across optometrists (p >= 0.05). The 95% confidence interval of repeatability (r) for the total sample was +/- 0.70 D for M, +/- 0.29 for J0, and +/- 0.21 D for J45. Conclusions: Based on these findings and previous research, it is suggested to establish 95% limits of agreement of +/- 0.75 D for M, and between +/- 0.25 D and +/- 0.50 D for both J0 and J45 when validating new refraction systems compared to subjective refraction as the gold standard, regardless of the age of the subjects evaluated.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Repeatability of the macular pigment spatial profile: A comparison of objective versus subjective classification [J].
Ctori, Irene ;
Mahroo, Omar A. ;
Williams, Katie M. ;
Hammond, Christopher J. ;
Huntjens, Byki .
ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2018, 96 (07) :E797-E803
[42]   The course of Lyme disease in different age groups [J].
Barskova, VG ;
Fedorov, ES ;
Ananieva, LP .
WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1999, 111 (22-23) :978-980
[43]   YSEX? A Replication Study in Different Age Groups [J].
Wyverkens, Elia ;
Dewitte, Marieke ;
Deschepper, Ellen ;
Corneillie, Joke ;
Van der Bracht, Lien ;
Van Regenmortel, Dina ;
Van Cleempoel, Kim ;
De Boose, Noortje ;
Prinssen, Petra ;
T'Sjoen, Guy .
JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2018, 15 (04) :492-501
[44]   Trust and trustworthiness across different age groups [J].
Sutter, Matthias ;
Kocher, Martin G. .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2007, 59 (02) :364-382
[45]   Comparison of Self-service Refractor with Auto-refraction and Subjective Refraction [J].
Zhen, Yi ;
Shen, Jing ;
Hao, Jie .
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2014, 55 (13)
[46]   Evaluation of Photobiological Effects in Different Age Groups [J].
Zhou X.-M. ;
Liu D.-D. .
Faguang Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Luminescence, 2017, 38 (06) :721-728
[47]   Agreement of a Pyramidal Wavefront-Based Autorefraction with Dry, Cycloplegic, and Subjective Refraction in Myopic Refractive Surgery Candidates [J].
Zarei-Ghanavati, Siamak ;
Najjaran, Marzieh ;
Hassanzadeh, Samira ;
Khabazkhoob, Mehdi ;
Gokul, Akilesh ;
Ziaei, Mohammed .
JOURNAL OF CURRENT OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 36 (01) :54-60
[48]   The effect of viewing distance on subjective refraction assessment [J].
Kucika, Alina ;
Rumjanceva, Ilona ;
Patrova, Tatjana ;
Svede, Aiga .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ESTONIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 2021, 70 (04) :317-325
[49]   Age and leadership: comparisons of age groups in different kinds of work environment [J].
Larsson, Gerry ;
Bjorklund, Christina .
MANAGEMENT RESEARCH REVIEW, 2021, 44 (05) :661-676
[50]   Infant emmetropization: Longitudinal changes in refraction components from nine to twenty months of age [J].
Ehrlich, DL ;
Braddick, OJ ;
Atkinson, J ;
Anker, S ;
Weeks, F ;
Hartley, T ;
Wade, J ;
Rudenski, A .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1997, 74 (10) :822-843