Repeatability of Subjective Refraction in Different Age Groups

被引:0
|
作者
Carpena-Torres, Carlos [1 ]
Batres, Laura [1 ]
Serramito, Maria [1 ]
Carracedo, Gonzalo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Fac Opt & Optometry, Dept Optometry & Vis, Ocupharm Res Grp, C Arcos Jalon 118, Madrid 28037, Spain
关键词
repeatability; subjective refraction; age; myopia; hyperopia; astigmatism; PRECISION;
D O I
10.3390/photonics11070634
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the inter-examiner repeatability of subjective refraction across diverse age cohorts, an aspect not previously investigated. Methods: A cross-sectional, randomized study enrolled 86 participants (mean age: 37.0 +/- 18.0 years), distributed into three groups: youth, non-presbyopic adults, and presbyopic adults. Each participant underwent three subjective refractions by three different optometrists on separate days. Repeatability analysis encompassed all refractive variables (M, J0, and J45). Results: There were no significant differences between optometrists in all refractive variables for either the overall sample or across age groups (p >= 0.05). Additionally, no correlation was found between participants' age and the mean difference in refractive variables across optometrists (p >= 0.05). The 95% confidence interval of repeatability (r) for the total sample was +/- 0.70 D for M, +/- 0.29 for J0, and +/- 0.21 D for J45. Conclusions: Based on these findings and previous research, it is suggested to establish 95% limits of agreement of +/- 0.75 D for M, and between +/- 0.25 D and +/- 0.50 D for both J0 and J45 when validating new refraction systems compared to subjective refraction as the gold standard, regardless of the age of the subjects evaluated.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] REPEATABILITY OF SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE REFRACTION
    ROSENFIELD, M
    CHIU, NN
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1995, 72 (08) : 577 - 579
  • [2] Visual acuity and refraction by age for children of three different ethnic groups in Paraguay
    Carter, Marissa Janine
    Lansingh, Van Charles
    Schacht, Gisela
    del Amo, Miguel Rio
    Scalamogna, Miguel
    France, Thomas Douglas
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE OFTALMOLOGIA, 2013, 76 (02) : 94 - 97
  • [3] Beyond traditional subjective refraction
    Rodriguez-Lopez, Victor
    Dorronsoro, Carlos
    CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 33 (03) : 228 - 234
  • [4] Subjective versus objective refraction in healthy young adults
    Kozlov, Yuval
    Kinori, Michael
    Armarnik, Sharon
    Yahalomi, Tal
    Ekshtein, Aya
    Levian, Leora
    Mezad-Koursh, Daphna
    Pikkel, Joseph
    Ben-Ari, Oded
    BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [5] Repeatability and accuracy of automated refraction: A comparison of the Nikon NRK-8000, the Nidek AR-1000, and subjective refraction
    Elliott, M
    Simpson, T
    Richter, D
    Fonn, D
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1997, 74 (06) : 434 - 438
  • [6] Subjective versus objective refraction in healthy young adults
    Yuval Kozlov
    Michael Kinori
    Sharon Armarnik
    Tal Yahalomi
    Aya Ekshtein
    Leora Levian
    Daphna Mezad-Koursh
    Joseph Pikkel
    Oded Ben-Ari
    BMC Ophthalmology, 24
  • [7] The repeatability of automated and clinician refraction
    Bullimore, MA
    Fusaro, RE
    Adams, CW
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1998, 75 (08) : 617 - 622
  • [8] Comparison Between Aberrometry-Based Binocular Refraction and Subjective Refraction
    Carracedo, Gonzalo
    Carpena-Torres, Carlos
    Serramito, Maria
    Batres-Valderas, Laura
    Gonzalez-Bergaz, Anahi
    TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 7 (04):
  • [9] Repeatability of Aberrometry-Based Automated Subjective Refraction in Healthy and Keratoconus Subjects
    Carracedo, Gonzalo
    Carpena-Torres, Carlos
    Pastrana, Cristina
    Privado-Aroco, Ana
    Serramito, Maria
    Batres, Laura
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 2020
  • [10] Excess of autorefraction over subjective refraction: Dependence on age
    Joubert, L
    Harris, WF
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1997, 74 (06) : 439 - 444