Development of ethical codes for instructors engaged in distance education: a Delphi study

被引:1
作者
Karatas, Abuzer [1 ]
Simsek, Nurettin [2 ]
机构
[1] Minister Educ MEB, Aydin, Turkiye
[2] Ankara Univ, Fac Educ Sci, Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
Distance education; ethic; ethical codes; code of ethics; instructors; online learning; Delphi technique; SOCIAL PRESENCE; ONLINE; COMPETENCES; ISSUES; ROLES; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1080/10494820.2024.2412079
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Ethical codes are written documents that delineate a set of rules and principles that guide the duties and responsibilities of professionals within a professional organization from an ethical perspective. The research aims to develop an ethical code framework for instructors engaged in distance education. The Delphi, a qualitative research method, was employed to achieve this aim. The study included 22 distance education experts, selected via purposive sampling. The Delphi technique, conducted in three rounds, commenced with an evaluation of the ethical dimensions of distance education. In the study's second phase, we invited participants to suggest additional ethical codes for the agreed-upon dimensions. We collected the suggestions and agreed on specific ethical code items in the third round. The researchers thus established the final form of the ethical code list. This process resulted in developing an ethical code framework for instructors engaged in distance education. The framework comprises sixdimensions: Instructional Design (ID), Social Interaction (SI), Content Provision (CP), Technology Usage (TU), Management (M), and Assessment and Evaluation (AE). It includes 62 ethical code items. The study demonstrates that the ethical code dimensions align with the roles of online instructors, as described in the relevant literature. This alignment substantiates the ethical code framework's validity and reliability.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 102 条
[91]  
Tatl C., 2023, Anemon Mu Alparslan niversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, V11, P199, DOI [https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.1227621, DOI 10.18506/ANEMON.1227621]
[92]  
Tatl C., 2023, Ankara Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Fakultesi Dergisi, V1, P331, DOI [https://doi.org/10.30964/auebfd.1260634, DOI 10.30964/AUEBFD.1260634]
[93]  
Teddlie C., 2009, Foundations of Mixed Methods Research
[94]  
Toprak E, 2010, TURK ONLINE J EDUC T, V9, P78
[95]  
UNESCO, 2023, UNESCOS ED RESP COVI
[96]   Assuring Academic Integrity of Online Testing in Fundamentals of Accounting Courses [J].
Whitlow, Elizabeth ;
Metts, Stephanie .
ONLINE LEARNING, 2024, 28 (01) :87-105
[97]   Why do open and distance education students drop out? Views from various stakeholders [J].
Yilmaz, Ayse Bagriacik ;
Karatas, Sercin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2022, 19 (01)
[98]   Factors Influencing Online Learning Satisfaction [J].
Yu, Qiangfu .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
[99]  
Zepke N., 2002, TEACH HIGH EDUC, V7, P309, DOI DOI 10.1080/13562510220144806
[100]   Effects of a learning analytics-based real-time feedback approach on knowledge elaboration, knowledge convergence, interactive relationships and group performance in CSCL [J].
Zheng, Lanqin ;
Niu, Jiayu ;
Zhong, Lu .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 53 (01) :130-149