Evaluating the resilience of residential buildings during a pandemic with a sustainable construction approach

被引:1
作者
Heydari, Ali [1 ]
Abbasianjahromi, Hamidreza [2 ]
机构
[1] Tehran Azad Univ Sci & Res, Master Engn & Construct Management, Tehran 1476656581, Iran
[2] K N Toosi Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn, Mirdamad Blvd 470, Tehran 19697-64499, Tehran Province, Iran
关键词
Residential building; Sustainability; Pandemic; COVID-19; Green building; MCDM; Home quarantine; Pandemic resistance; ASSESSMENT-TOOL; COVID-19; SELECTION; DESIGN; HEALTH; AHP;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31006
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The COVID-19 pandemic has been a catastrophic event that has affected all aspects of human life worldwide. Due to the high genetic mutations of the virus, there has been a prolonged search for definitive therapeutic discovery, leading to extended periods of home quarantine. As a result, homes have become multipurpose spaces for work, education, sports, and other daily activities. Given the importance of residential buildings as the first line of defense against possible future pandemics, a model has been proposed to assess their readiness to handle pandemics using a sustainable development approach. This study investigates the most crucial criteria for evaluating residential buildings and applies them in a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) process. The final evaluation model is presented using the SWARA and COCOSO methods, along with a set of criteria selected and weighted by experts. The study shows that the criteria related to health and safety are more critical than other sectors. Buildings that meet the standards of this group better are likely to have a higher score.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   RETRACTED: An integrated neutrosophic ANP and VIKOR method for achieving sustainable supplier selection: A case study in importing field (Retracted article. See vol. 139, 2022) [J].
Abdel-Baset, M. ;
Chang, Victor ;
Gamal, Abduallah ;
Smarandache, Florentin .
COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 2019, 106 :94-110
[2]   A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Sustainable Green Building Indicators under an Uncertain Environment [J].
Abdel-Basset, Mohamed ;
Gamal, Abduallah ;
Chakrabortty, Ripon K. ;
Ryan, Michael ;
El-Saber, Nissreen .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (11)
[3]   A multi-criteria decision-making framework for building sustainability assessment in Kazakhstan [J].
Akhanova, Gulzhanat ;
Nadeem, Abid ;
Kim, Jong R. ;
Azhar, Salman .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2020, 52
[4]   Developing a green building assessment tool for developing countries - Case of Jordan [J].
Ali, Hikmat H. ;
Al Nsairat, Saba F. .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 44 (05) :1053-1064
[5]   Towards building resilient cities to pandemics: A review of COVID-19 literature [J].
Amirzadeh, Melika ;
Sobhaninia, Saeideh ;
Buckman, Stephen T. ;
Sharifi, Ayyoob .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2023, 89
[6]   RETRACTED: A Review on Building Design as a Biomedical System for Preventing COVID-19 Pandemic [J].
Amran, Mugahed ;
Makul, Natt ;
Fediuk, Roman ;
Borovkov, Aleksey ;
Ali, Mujahid ;
Zeyad, Abdullah M. .
BUILDINGS, 2022, 12 (05)
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2020, High Noon during Coronavirus Lockdown
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Smart Contracts Using Blockchain Technology: a Better Way to Deliver Construction Projects
[9]   Methodology to Identify and Prioritise the Social Aspects to Be Considered in the Design of More Sustainable Residential Buildings-Application to a Developing Country [J].
Ardda, Nisreen ;
Mateus, Ricardo ;
Braganca, Luis .
BUILDINGS, 2018, 8 (10)
[10]   Sustainability and green building rating systems: LEED, BREEAM, GSAS and Estidama critical analysis [J].
Awadh, Omair .
JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2017, 11 :25-29