Development and validation of two environmental DNA assays for American Eel (Anguilla rostrata)

被引:2
作者
Moyer, Gregory R. [1 ]
Bartron, Meredith L. [2 ]
Galbraith, Heather S. [3 ,4 ]
Grassi, Josh [1 ,5 ]
Rees, Christopher B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Mansfield Univ, Dept Biol, Mansfield, PA 16933 USA
[2] US Fish & Wildlife Serv, Northeast Fishery Ctr, Lamar, PA USA
[3] US Geol Survey, Northern Appalachian Res Lab, Wellsboro, PA USA
[4] US Fish & Wildlife Serv, Ecol Serv Program, State Coll, PA USA
[5] Penn Dept Environm Protect, Meadville, PA USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL DNA | 2023年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
cytochrome b; environmental DNA; fish; mitochondria; NADH dehydrogenase; qPCR; ANTHROPOGENIC IMPACTS; ABUNDANCE; RIVER; POINT; MAFFT; EDNA; TOOL;
D O I
10.1002/edn3.369
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We developed and validated two species-specific qPCR markers to detect American Eel environmental DNA. Marker validation included assay design, specificity and sensitivity testing, and in vivo laboratory and field experiments. Markers AME1 and AME2 targeted 116 and 129 bp fragments of the mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 and cytochrome b genes, respectively. Markers were 94%-100% homologous for all 49 aligned American Eel sequences. Specificity tests, with known DNA obtained from 149 individuals spanning 81 fish species, amplified DNA derived from American Eel tissue exclusively. Each marker also had high sensitivity with LOD and LOQ values of 2.8-50 copies. For each marker, pilot testing of American Eel in aquaria at increasing densities (n = 0, 1, 5, 10 eels) showed a significant (p < 0.03) negative relationship between mean qPCR cycle threshold value and number of eels per tank. Our in situ testing of water samples collected from 35 sites on the East Coast (from as far south as Maryland to as far north as Maine) revealed that sites known to contain populations of American Eel (n = 11) were all positive for American Eel DNA, while sites where American Eel were presumed absent (n = 24) failed to amplify American Eel DNA. In three cases, our assays produced positive detections in the lower portion of a watershed but failed to detect American Eel upstream of a presumed impassible barrier in each of the same watersheds (all internal positive controls indicated no evidence of PCR inhibition in our field samples and all negative controls indicated no evidence of contamination). Our encouraging results of in vitro and in situ validation demonstrate the utility of using eDNA as a tool to aid in American Eel conservation efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 190
页数:16
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2019, Environmental DNA, DOI [10.1002/edn3.21, DOI 10.1002/EDN3.21]
  • [2] Atlantic State Marine Fisheries Commission, 2000, Fishery Management Report No. 36
  • [3] The MIQE Guidelines: Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments
    Bustin, Stephen A.
    Benes, Vladimir
    Garson, Jeremy A.
    Hellemans, Jan
    Huggett, Jim
    Kubista, Mikael
    Mueller, Reinhold
    Nolan, Tania
    Pfaffl, Michael W.
    Shipley, Gregory L.
    Vandesompele, Jo
    Wittwer, Carl T.
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2009, 55 (04) : 611 - 622
  • [4] Is the detection of aquatic environmental DNA influenced by substrate type?
    Buxton, Andrew S.
    Groombridge, Jim J.
    Griffiths, Richard A.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (08):
  • [5] Thirteen novel ideas and underutilised resources to support progress towards a range-wide American eel stock assessment
    Cairns, David K.
    Benchetrit, Jose
    Bernatchez, Louis
    Bornarel, Virginie
    Casselman, John M.
    Castonguay, Martin
    Charsley, Anthony R.
    Dorow, Malte
    Drouineau, Hilaire
    Frankowski, Jens
    Haro, Alex
    Hoyle, Simon D.
    Knickle, D. Craig
    Koops, Marten A.
    Poirier, Luke A.
    Thorson, James T.
    Young, John
    Zhu, Xinhua
    [J]. FISHERIES MANAGEMENT AND ECOLOGY, 2022, 29 (05) : 516 - 541
  • [6] Canchola J.A., 2017, MOJ Proteomics Bioinform, V6, DOI DOI 10.15406/MOJPB.2017.06.00200
  • [7] Relating American Eel Abundance to Environmental DNA Concentration in the Bronx River
    Chin, Sam Chew
    Waldman, John
    Bednarski, Mike
    Camhi, Merry
    LaBelle, Jake
    Alter, S. Elizabeth
    [J]. NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES MANAGEMENT, 2021, 41 (04) : 1141 - 1150
  • [8] Crawley M.J., 2007, The R book, P323
  • [9] Validation of environmental DNA (eDNA) as a detection tool for at-risk freshwater pearly mussel species (Bivalvia: Unionidae)
    Currier, Charise A.
    Morris, Todd J.
    Wilson, Chris C.
    Freeland, Joanna R.
    [J]. AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2018, 28 (03) : 545 - 558
  • [10] From molecules to management: Adopting DNA-based methods for monitoring biological invasions in aquatic environments
    Darling, John A.
    Mahon, Andrew R.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2011, 111 (07) : 978 - 988