An Efficient Multi-objective Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Based on Improved NSGA-II

被引:0
作者
Shi, Xingyu [1 ]
Duan, Yanhui [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Syst Sci & Engn, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
来源
2023 ASIA-PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY, VOL II, APISAT 2023 | 2024年 / 1051卷
关键词
POD; NSGA-II; Multi-Objective Optimization; Convergence Criterion; PROPER ORTHOGONAL DECOMPOSITION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1007/978-981-97-4010-9_86
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
In this paper, we propose an efficient multi-objective aerodynamic shape optimization combining the POD geometric parameterization method and the improved NSGA-II algorithm. Compared to other traditional airfoil parameterization methods, POD has been found to give the most efficient coverage of the airfoil design space using relatively fewer parameterization variables. Therefore, the application of the POD method in aerodynamic design optimization can effectively reduce the number of design variables and have the potential to improve optimization efficiency. Besides, when NSGA-II is adopted in aerodynamic optimization, the maximum generation is often used as the iteration stopping criterion, which can easily lead to the waste of computational resources. Here, the authors suggest a convergence criterion for Pareto solution sets, which determines whether the algorithm stops based on the distance between results of adjacent generations. The effectiveness of this method has been verified through test problems experiments. Finally, a transonic RAE2822 airfoil case with two objectives and three constraints is presented. Simulation results showthat our proposed method significantly improves the efficiency of aerodynamic shape optimization under condition of the approximately unchanged optimal extent.
引用
收藏
页码:1107 / 1116
页数:10
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Balachandar S, 1998, AIAA J, V36, DOI [10.2514/2.399, DOI 10.2514/2.399]
[2]   SHAPE OPTIMAL-DESIGN USING B-SPLINES [J].
BRAIBANT, V ;
FLEURY, C .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 1984, 44 (03) :247-267
[3]  
Chai R., 2017, AIAA SPACE and Astronautics Forum and Exposition: 5193
[4]   Airfoil Design Parameterization and Optimization Using Bezier Generative Adversarial Networks [J].
Chen, Wei ;
Chiu, Kevin ;
Fuge, Mark D. .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2020, 58 (11) :4723-4735
[5]  
Cook P.H., 1977, Aerofoil RAE2822: Pressure Distributions, and Boundary Layer and Wake Measurements
[6]   A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II [J].
Deb, K ;
Pratap, A ;
Agarwal, S ;
Meyarivan, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2002, 6 (02) :182-197
[7]   Aerodynamic blade design with multi-objective optimization for a tiltrotor aircraft [J].
Droandi, Giovanni ;
Gibertini, Giuseppe .
AIRCRAFT ENGINEERING AND AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 87 (01) :19-29
[8]   On the physical interpretation of proper orthogonal modes in vibrations [J].
Feeny, BF ;
Kappagantu, R .
JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 1998, 211 (04) :607-616
[9]  
Ghoman Satyajit., 2012, 53 AIAA ASME ASCE AH, DOI DOI 10.2514/6.2012-1808
[10]   WING DESIGN BY NUMERICAL OPTIMIZATION [J].
HICKS, RM ;
HENNE, PA .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 1978, 15 (07) :407-412