Prediction of Total Soluble Solids Content Using Tomato Characteristics: Comparison Artificial Neural Network vs. Multiple Linear Regression

被引:1
|
作者
Kabas, Aylin [1 ]
Ercan, Ugur [2 ]
Kabas, Onder [3 ]
Moiceanu, Georgiana [4 ]
机构
[1] Akdeniz Univ, Manavgat Vocat Sch, Dept Organ Farming, TR-07070 Antalya, Turkiye
[2] Akdeniz Univ, Dept Informat, TR-07070 Antalya, Turkiye
[3] Akdeniz Univ, Tech Sci Vocat Sch, Dept Machine, TR-07070 Antalya, Turkiye
[4] Natl Univ Sci & Technol Politehn Bucharest, Fac Entrepreneurship Business Engn & Management, Dept Entrepreneurship & Management, Bucharest 060042, Romania
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2024年 / 14卷 / 17期
关键词
Artificial Neural Networks; multiple linear regression; brix; tomato; INTROGRESSION LINE; SUGAR CONTENT; SEED YIELD; FRUIT; LYCOPENE; WEIGHT; CHLOROPHYLL; PERFORMANCE; MODELS; SINGLE;
D O I
10.3390/app14177741
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Tomatoes are among the world's most significant vegetables, both in terms of production and consumption. Harvesting takes place in tomato production when the important quality attribute of total soluble solids content reaches its maximum possible level. Tomato total soluble solids content (TSS) is among the most crucial attribute parameters for assessing tomato quality and for tomato commercialization. Determination of total soluble solids content by conventional measurement methods is both destructive and time-consuming. Therefore, the tomato processing industry needs a rapid identification method to measure total soluble solids content (TSS). In this study, we aimed to estimate how much soluble solids there are in beef tomato fruit by Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) methods. The models were assessed using the Coefficient of Determination (R2), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) metrics. The training data set results of the MLR model established to estimate the amount of brix in tomato fruit, calculated as MAE: 0.2349, RMSE: 0.3048, R2: 0.8441, and MAPE: 5.5368, while, according to the ANN model, MAE: 0.0250, RMSE: 0.031, R2: 0.9982 and MAPE: 0.5814. According to the metric outcomes, the ANN-based model performed better in both the training and testing parts.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of artificial neural network and multiple linear regression for prediction of first lactation milk yield using early body weights in Sahiwal cattle
    Manoj, M.
    Gandhi, R. S.
    Raja, T., V
    Ruhil, A. P.
    Singh, A.
    Gupta, A. K.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2014, 84 (04) : 427 - 430
  • [22] PREDICTION OF pH AND TOTAL SOLUBLE SOLIDS CONTENT OF MANGO USING BIRESPONSE MULTIPREDICTOR LOCAL POLYNOMIAL NONPARAMETRIC REGRESSION
    Ulya, Millatul
    Chamidah, Nur
    Saifudin, Toha
    COMMUNICATIONS IN MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2023,
  • [23] Comparison of multiple linear regression and artificial neural network in developing the objective functions of the orthopaedic screws
    Hsu, Ching-Chi
    Lin, Jinn
    Chao, Ching-Kong
    COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2011, 104 (03) : 341 - 348
  • [24] Comparison of Artificial Neural Network and Multiple Regression Analysis for Prediction of Fat Tail Weight of Sheep
    Norouzian, M. A.
    Alavijeh, M. Vakili
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 6 (04): : 895 - 900
  • [25] Correct vs. accurate prediction: A comparison between prediction power of artificial neural networks and logistic regression in psychological researches
    Pourshahriar, Hossein
    4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2012, 32 : 97 - 103
  • [26] Surface tension prediction of vegetable oils using artificial neural networks and multiple linear regression
    Melo-Espinosa, Eliezer Ahmed
    Sanchez-Borroto, Yisel
    Errasti, Michel
    Piloto-Rodriguez, Ramon
    Sierens, Roger
    Roger-Riba, Jordi
    Christopher-Hansen, Alan
    2013 ISES SOLAR WORLD CONGRESS, 2014, 57 : 886 - +
  • [27] Forecasting of wind speed using multiple linear regression and artificial neural networks
    Barhmi, Soukaina
    Elfatni, Omkaltoume
    Belhaj, Ismail
    ENERGY SYSTEMS-OPTIMIZATION MODELING SIMULATION AND ECONOMIC ASPECTS, 2020, 11 (04): : 935 - 946
  • [28] Comparison of neural network and multiple linear regression as dissolution predictors
    Sathe, PM
    Venitz, J
    DRUG DEVELOPMENT AND INDUSTRIAL PHARMACY, 2003, 29 (03) : 349 - 355
  • [29] Comparison of the decision tree, artificial neural network and multiple regression methods for prediction of carcass tissues composition of goat kids
    Ekiz, Bulent
    Baygul, Oguzhan
    Yalcintan, Hulya
    Ozcan, Mustafa
    MEAT SCIENCE, 2020, 161
  • [30] Forecasting of wind speed using multiple linear regression and artificial neural networks
    Soukaina Barhmi
    Omkaltoume Elfatni
    Ismail Belhaj
    Energy Systems, 2020, 11 : 935 - 946