Extended cognitive reliability and error analysis method for advanced control rooms of nuclear power plants

被引:2
|
作者
Zhang, Xiaodan [1 ]
Yan, Shengyuan [1 ]
Liu, Xin [1 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Engn Univ, Coll Mech & Elect Engn, Harbin 150001, Peoples R China
关键词
Human reliability analysis; The extended CREAM; The interval 2-tuple linguistic model; Human error probability; DEPENDENCE ASSESSMENT; CREAM MODEL; FUZZY; QUANTIFICATION; TASKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.net.2024.03.044
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
This study proposes a modified extended cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM) for achieving a more accurate human error probability (HEP) in advanced control rooms. The traditional approach lacks failure data and does not consider the common performance condition (CPC) weights in different cognitive functions. The modified extended CREAM decomposes tasks using a method that combines structured information analysis (SIA) and the extended CREAM. The modified extended CREAM performs the weight analysis of CPCs in different cognitive functions, and the weights include cognitive, correlative, and important weights. We used the extended CREAM to obtain the cognitive weight. We determined the correlative weights of the CPCs for different cognitive functions using the triangular fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (TF-DEMATEL), and evaluated the importance weight of CPCs based on the interval 2-tuple linguistic approach and ensured the value of the importance weight using the entropy method in the different cognitive functions. Finally, we obtained the comprehensive weights of the different cognitive functions and calculated the HEPs. The accuracy and sensitivity of the modified extended CREAM were compared with those of the basic CREAM. The results demonstrate that the modified extended CREAM calculates the HEP more effectively in advanced control rooms.
引用
收藏
页码:3472 / 3482
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cognitive Reliability Error Analysis Method (CREAM) at the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER)
    Vladykina, Svetlana
    Thurner, Thomas Wolfgang
    QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 35 (06) : 1621 - 1633
  • [22] Design of a model predictive control method for load tracking in nuclear power plants
    Wang, Guoxu
    Wu, Jie
    Zeng, Bifan
    Xu, Zhibin
    Wu, Wanqiang
    Ma, Xiaoqian
    PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2017, 101 : 260 - 269
  • [23] Human Factors and Functional Safety Analysis in Designing the Control Rooms of Industrial Hazardous Plants
    Kosmowski, Kazimierz T.
    INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS IN TECHNICAL AND MEDICAL DIAGNOSTICS, 2014, 230 : 499 - 510
  • [24] Inter-relationships between performance shaping factors for human reliability analysis of nuclear power plants
    Park, Jooyoung
    Jung, Wondea
    Kim, Jonghyun
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 52 (01) : 87 - 100
  • [25] FUZZY LOGIC METHOD CONSIDERING COGNITIVE PROCESS FOR HUMAN RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF SPACE LAUNCH MISSIONS
    Zhao, Xianheng
    Pan, Xing
    Zhang, Wenjin
    Lu, Xinpei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND PRACTICE, 2020, 27 (05): : 779 - 790
  • [26] The Mechanism of how Design Failures cause Unsafe Behavior: The Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM)
    Liao, Pin-Chao
    Luo, Xintong
    Wang, Tao
    Su, Yusong
    ICSDEC 2016 - INTEGRATING DATA SCIENCE, CONSTRUCTION AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 145 : 715 - 722
  • [27] Dynamic human reliability analysis method for nuclear power plant main control room based on SPAR-H and SD
    Liu, Xin
    Yan, Shengyuan
    Zhang, Xiaodan
    Ahmed, Waqas
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 57 (03)
  • [28] Research of Quantification Method of Risk in Seismic Probabilistic Safety Analysis in Nuclear Power Plants
    Jing X.
    Xiao J.
    Hedongli Gongcheng/Nuclear Power Engineering, 2021, 42 (03): : 145 - 149
  • [29] Bayesian belief network-based human reliability analysis methodology for start-up and shutdown operations in nuclear power plants
    Jo, Wooseok
    Lee, Seung Jun
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2022, 179
  • [30] Human error probabilities from operational experience of German nuclear power plants
    Preischl, Wolfgang
    Hellmich, Mario
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2013, 109 : 150 - 159