AI-based automated segmentation for ovarian/adnexal masses and their internal components on ultrasound imaging

被引:0
|
作者
Whitney, Heather M. [1 ]
Yoeli-Bik, Roni [2 ]
Abramowicz, Jacques S. [3 ]
Lan, Li [1 ]
Li, Hui [1 ]
Longman, Ryan E. [3 ]
Lengyel, Ernst [2 ]
Giger, Maryellen L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sect Gynecol Oncol, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Genet & Fetal Neonatal Care Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sect Ultrasound, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
adnexal diseases; ovarian cancer; ultrasound; segmentation; machine learning; deep learning; ADNEXAL MASSES; SUBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT; BREAST-LESIONS; DIAGNOSIS; CANCER; ACCURACY; FEATURES; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1117/1.JMI.11.4.044505
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose Segmentation of ovarian/adnexal masses from surrounding tissue on ultrasound images is a challenging task. The separation of masses into different components may also be important for radiomic feature extraction. Our study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence-based automatic segmentation method for transvaginal ultrasound images that (1) outlines the exterior boundary of adnexal masses and (2) separates internal components. Approach A retrospective ultrasound imaging database of adnexal masses was reviewed for exclusion criteria at the patient, mass, and image levels, with one image per mass. The resulting 54 adnexal masses (36 benign/18 malignant) from 53 patients were separated by patient into training (26 benign/12 malignant) and independent test (10 benign/6 malignant) sets. U-net segmentation performance on test images compared to expert detailed outlines was measured using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the ratio of the Hausdorff distance to the effective diameter of the outline (RHD-D) for each mass. Subsequently, in discovery mode, a two-level fuzzy c-means (FCM) unsupervised clustering approach was used to separate the pixels within masses belonging to hypoechoic or hyperechoic components. Results The DSC (median [95% confidence interval]) was 0.91 [0.78, 0.96], and RHD-D was 0.04 [0.01, 0.12], indicating strong agreement with expert outlines. Clinical review of the internal separation of masses into echogenic components demonstrated a strong association with mass characteristics. Conclusion A combined U-net and FCM algorithm for automatic segmentation of adnexal masses and their internal components achieved excellent results compared with expert outlines and review, supporting future radiomic feature-based classification of the masses by components. (c) The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the originalpublication, including its DOI. [DOI:10.1117/1.JMI.11.4.044505]
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ultrasound Monitoring of Extant Adnexal Masses in the Era of Type 1 and Type 2 Ovarian Cancers: Lessons Learned From Ovarian Cancer Screening Trials
    Ormsby, Eleanor L.
    Pavlik, Edward J.
    McGahan, John P.
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2017, 7 (02)
  • [42] A perspective on the diagnosis of cracked tooth: imaging modalities evolve to AI-based analysis
    Guo, Juncheng
    Wu, Yuyan
    Chen, Lizhi
    Long, Shangbin
    Chen, Daqi
    Ouyang, Haibing
    Zhang, Chunliang
    Tang, Yadong
    Wang, Wenlong
    BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING ONLINE, 2022, 21 (01)
  • [43] Automated texture-based segmentation of ultrasound images of the prostate
    Richard, WD
    Keen, CG
    COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS, 1996, 20 (03) : 131 - 140
  • [44] AI-Based Detection, Classification and Prediction/Prognosis in Medical Imaging: Towards Radiophenomics
    Yousefirizi, Fereshteh
    Decazes, Pierre
    Amyar, Amine
    Ruan, Su
    Saboury, Babak
    Rahmim, Arman
    PET CLINICS, 2022, 17 (01) : 183 - 212
  • [45] Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging (O-RADS MRI) Score for Risk Stratification of Sonographically Indeterminate Adnexal Masses
    Thomassin-Naggara, Isabelle
    Poncelet, Edouard
    Jalaguier-Coudray, Aurelie
    Guerra, Adalgisa
    Fournier, Laure S.
    Stojanovic, Sanja
    Millet, Ingrid
    Bharwani, Nishat
    Juhan, Valerie
    Cunha, Teresa M.
    Masselli, Gabriele
    Balleyguier, Corinne
    Malhaire, Caroline
    Perrot, Nicolas F.
    Sadowski, Elizabeth A.
    Bazot, Marc
    Taourel, Patrice
    Porcher, Raphael
    Darai, Emile
    Reinhold, Caroline
    Rockall, Andrea G.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (01)
  • [46] Diagnostic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Based International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Simple Rules and Assessment of the Different Neoplasias in the Adnexa Model in Malignancy Prediction Among Women With Adnexal Masses: A Systematic Review
    Suryawanshi, Shweta, V
    Dwidmuthe, Kanchan S.
    Savalkar, Snehal
    Bhalerao, Anuja
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (08)
  • [47] Computer-aided diagnosis of peripheral soft tissue masses based on ultrasound imaging
    Chiou, Hong-Jen
    Chen, Chih-Yen
    Liu, Tzu-Chiang
    Chiou, See-Ying
    Wang, Hsin-Kai
    Chou, Yi-Hong
    Chiang, Huihua Kenny
    COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS, 2009, 33 (05) : 408 - 413
  • [48] Nomogram based on the O-RADS for predicting the malignancy risk of adnexal masses with complex ultrasound morphology
    Gong, Li-Ping
    Li, Xiao-Ying
    Wu, Ying-Nan
    Dong, Shuang
    Zhang, Shuang
    Feng, Ya-Nan
    Lv, Ya-Er
    Guo, Xi-Juan
    Peng, Yan-Qing
    Du, Xiao-Shan
    Tian, Jia-Wei
    Sun, Cong-Xin
    Sun, Li-Tao
    JOURNAL OF OVARIAN RESEARCH, 2023, 16 (01)
  • [49] Indeterminate adnexal masses at ultrasound: effect of MRI imaging findings on diagnostic thinking and therapeutic decisions
    Bianka Chilla
    Nik Hauser
    Gad Singer
    Mafalda Trippel
    Johannes M. Froehlich
    Rahel A. Kubik-Huch
    European Radiology, 2011, 21 : 1301 - 1310
  • [50] The importance of multi-modal imaging and clinical information for humans and AI-based algorithms to classify breast masses (INSPiRED 003): an international, multicenter analysis
    Pfob, Andre
    Sidey-Gibbons, Chris
    Barr, Richard G.
    Duda, Volker
    Alwafai, Zaher
    Balleyguier, Corinne
    Clevert, Dirk-Andre
    Fastner, Sarah
    Gomez, Christina
    Goncalo, Manuela
    Gruber, Ines
    Hahn, Markus
    Hennigs, Andre
    Kapetas, Panagiotis
    Lu, Sheng-Chieh
    Nees, Juliane
    Ohlinger, Ralf
    Riedel, Fabian
    Rutten, Matthieu
    Schaefgen, Benedikt
    Schuessler, Maximilian
    Stieber, Anne
    Togawa, Riku
    Tozaki, Mitsuhiro
    Wojcinski, Sebastian
    Xu, Cai
    Rauch, Geraldine
    Heil, Joerg
    Golatta, Michael
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (06) : 4101 - 4115