AI-based automated segmentation for ovarian/adnexal masses and their internal components on ultrasound imaging

被引:0
|
作者
Whitney, Heather M. [1 ]
Yoeli-Bik, Roni [2 ]
Abramowicz, Jacques S. [3 ]
Lan, Li [1 ]
Li, Hui [1 ]
Longman, Ryan E. [3 ]
Lengyel, Ernst [2 ]
Giger, Maryellen L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sect Gynecol Oncol, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Genet & Fetal Neonatal Care Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sect Ultrasound, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
adnexal diseases; ovarian cancer; ultrasound; segmentation; machine learning; deep learning; ADNEXAL MASSES; SUBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT; BREAST-LESIONS; DIAGNOSIS; CANCER; ACCURACY; FEATURES; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1117/1.JMI.11.4.044505
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose Segmentation of ovarian/adnexal masses from surrounding tissue on ultrasound images is a challenging task. The separation of masses into different components may also be important for radiomic feature extraction. Our study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence-based automatic segmentation method for transvaginal ultrasound images that (1) outlines the exterior boundary of adnexal masses and (2) separates internal components. Approach A retrospective ultrasound imaging database of adnexal masses was reviewed for exclusion criteria at the patient, mass, and image levels, with one image per mass. The resulting 54 adnexal masses (36 benign/18 malignant) from 53 patients were separated by patient into training (26 benign/12 malignant) and independent test (10 benign/6 malignant) sets. U-net segmentation performance on test images compared to expert detailed outlines was measured using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the ratio of the Hausdorff distance to the effective diameter of the outline (RHD-D) for each mass. Subsequently, in discovery mode, a two-level fuzzy c-means (FCM) unsupervised clustering approach was used to separate the pixels within masses belonging to hypoechoic or hyperechoic components. Results The DSC (median [95% confidence interval]) was 0.91 [0.78, 0.96], and RHD-D was 0.04 [0.01, 0.12], indicating strong agreement with expert outlines. Clinical review of the internal separation of masses into echogenic components demonstrated a strong association with mass characteristics. Conclusion A combined U-net and FCM algorithm for automatic segmentation of adnexal masses and their internal components achieved excellent results compared with expert outlines and review, supporting future radiomic feature-based classification of the masses by components. (c) The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the originalpublication, including its DOI. [DOI:10.1117/1.JMI.11.4.044505]
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Imaging of Benign Adnexal Masses: Characteristic Presentations on Ultrasound, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Heilbrun, Marta E.
    Olpin, Jeffery
    Shaaban, Akram
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 52 (01) : 21 - 39
  • [12] Validation of American College of Radiology Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Ultrasound (O-RADS US): Analysis on 1054 adnexal masses
    Cao, Lan
    Wei, Mingjie
    Liu, Ying
    Fu, Juan
    Zhang, Honghuan
    Huang, Jing
    Pei, Xiaoqing
    Zhou, Jianhua
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 162 (01) : 107 - 112
  • [13] New Ultrasound-Based Technologies for Predicting Ovarian Cancer in Adnexal Masses
    Luis Alcazar, Juan
    CURRENT WOMENS HEALTH REVIEWS, 2007, 3 (02) : 89 - 94
  • [14] Ultrasound image-based nomogram combining clinical, radiomics, and deep transfer learning features for automatic classification of ovarian masses according to O-RADS
    Liu, Lu
    Cai, Wenjun
    Tian, Hongyan
    Wu, Beibei
    Zhang, Jing
    Wang, Ting
    Hao, Yi
    Yue, Guanghui
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [15] Automatic Texture-Based Analysis in Ultrasound Imaging of Ovarian Masses
    Faschingbauer, F.
    Beckmann, M. W.
    Goecke, T. Weyert
    Renner, S.
    Haeberle, L.
    Benz, M.
    Wittenberg, T.
    Muenzenmayer, C.
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2013, 34 (02): : 145 - 150
  • [16] EFFECT OF A NOVEL SEGMENTATION ALGORITHM ON RADIOLOGISTS' DIAGNOSIS OF BREAST MASSES USING ULTRASOUND IMAGING
    Tian Jia-Wei
    Ning Chun-Ping
    Guo Yan-Hui
    Cheng Heng-Da
    Tang Xiang-Long
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 38 (01) : 119 - 127
  • [17] Impact of a multiparameter, ultrasound-based triage on surgical management of adnexal masses
    Berlanda, N
    Ferrari, MM
    Mezzopane, R
    Boero, V
    Grijuela, B
    Ferrazzi, E
    Pardi, G
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 20 (02) : 181 - 185
  • [18] Indeterminate adnexal masses at ultrasound: effect of MRI imaging findings on diagnostic thinking and therapeutic decisions
    Chilla, Bianka
    Hauser, Nik
    Singer, Gad
    Trippel, Mafalda
    Froehlich, Johannes M.
    Kubik-Huch, Rahel A.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (06) : 1301 - 1310
  • [19] Comparison of ultrasound-based ADNEX model with magnetic resonance imaging for discriminating adnexal masses: a multi-center study
    Hu, Yanli
    Chen, Bo
    Dong, Hongmei
    Sheng, Bo
    Xiao, Zhibo
    Li, Jia
    Tian, Wei
    Lv, Furong
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [20] An explainable machine learning model to solid adnexal masses diagnosis based on clinical data and qualitative ultrasound indicators
    Fanizzi, Annarita
    Arezzo, Francesca
    Cormio, Gennaro
    Comes, Maria Colomba
    Cazzato, Gerardo
    Boldrini, Luca
    Bove, Samantha
    Bollino, Michele
    Kardhashi, Anila
    Silvestris, Erica
    Quarto, Pietro
    Mongelli, Michele
    Naglieri, Emanuele
    Signorile, Rahel
    Loizzi, Vera
    Massafra, Raffaella
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (12):