Lessons learned on the feasibility of coastal wetland restoration for blue carbon and co-benefits in Australia

被引:2
作者
Hagger, Valerie [1 ]
Stewart-Sinclair, Phoebe [2 ]
Rossini, Renee Anne [1 ]
Adame, Maria Fernanda [3 ]
Glamore, William [4 ]
Lavery, Paul [5 ,6 ]
Waltham, Nathan J. [7 ]
Lovelock, Catherine E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Environm, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Atmospher Res Ltd, Natl Inst Water, Dept Marine Ecol, Hamilton, New Zealand
[3] Griffith Univ, Australian Rivers Inst, Ctr Marine & Coastal Res, Southport, Qld, Australia
[4] Univ New South Wales Sydney, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Water Res Lab, Manly Vale, NSW, Australia
[5] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Sci, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia
[6] Edith Cowan Univ, Ctr Marine Ecosyst Res, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia
[7] James Cook Univ, Coll Sci & Engn, Ctr Trop Water & Aquat Ecosyst Res, Townsville, Qld, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
MANGROVE; MARSH; CONSERVATION; ECOSYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT; GAINS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122287
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Diverse types of saline coastal wetlands contribute significantly to global biodiversity, carbon stocks, and ecosystem functions. Opportunities to incentivise coastal wetland restoration from carbon markets is growing across the world. However, little is known of the economic feasibility of blue carbon restoration across different regions, or the quantities of ecological and social co-benefits that accompany restoration. We explored the opportunities for tidal restoration of coastal wetlands for blue carbon projects in three regions across Australia. We identified biophysically suitable potential restoration sites for mangroves, saltmarshes and supratidal forests, estimated their carbon abatement over 25 years, and undertook a cost-benefit analysis under the carbon market. Potential co-benefits of restoration sites for biodiversity, fisheries, water quality and coastal protection were measured to identify economically feasible sites that maximise the provision of co-benefits. Cultural benefits were identified as the potential for leadership and collaboration by Traditional Custodians at sites. We found that the extent of restoration opportunities varied among regions, with variation in tidal range, extent of agricultural land-use, and the type of hydrological modifications influencing carbon abatement forecasts. The presence of threatened species in hydrologically modified wetlands reduced the amount of land available for restoration, however the restoration of remaining areas could produce rich ecological and cultural benefits. A high carbon price was needed to make blue carbon restoration profitable on land used for beef production. We found sites where carbon credits can be bundled with co-benefits to possibly attain higher carbon prices. Traditional Custodians were interested in leading blue carbon projects, however the opportunity is dependent on Native Title rights. Through comparison of case studies, we developed a regional approach to identify coastal wetland restoration sites for blue carbon and co-benefits that can incorporate local knowledge and data availability, engage with Traditional Custodians, and adapt to the unique characteristics of regions.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [31] Promoting co-benefits of carbon farming in Oceania: Applying and adapting approaches and metrics from existing market-based schemes
    Baumber, Alex
    Metternicht, Graciela
    Cross, Rebecca
    Ruoso, Laure-Elise
    Cowie, Annette L.
    Waters, Cathleen
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2019, 39
  • [32] Variability and Vulnerability of Coastal ‘Blue Carbon’ Stocks: A Case Study from Southeast Australia
    Carolyn J. Ewers Lewis
    Paul E. Carnell
    Jonathan Sanderman
    Jeffrey A. Baldock
    Peter I. Macreadie
    Ecosystems, 2018, 21 : 263 - 279
  • [33] Social Factors Key to Landscape-Scale Coastal Restoration: Lessons Learned from Three US Case Studies
    DeAngelis, Bryan M.
    Sutton-Grier, Ariana E.
    Colden, Allison
    Arkema, Katie K.
    Baillie, Christopher J.
    Bennett, Richard O.
    Benoit, Jeff
    Blitch, Seth
    Chatwin, Anthony
    Dausman, Alyssa
    Gittman, Rachel K.
    Greening, Holly S.
    Henkel, Jessica R.
    Houge, Rachel
    Howard, Ron
    Hughes, A. Randall
    Lowe, Jeremy
    Scyphers, Steven B.
    Sherwood, Edward T.
    Westby, Stephanie
    Grabowski, Jonathan H.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (03)
  • [34] Valuing co-benefits to make low-carbon investments in cities bankable: the case of waste and transportation projects
    Rashidi, Kaveh
    Stadelmann, Martin
    Patt, Anthony
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2017, 34 : 69 - 78
  • [35] Tradeoffs in habitat value to maximize natural resource benefits from coastal restoration in a rapidly eroding wetland: is monitoring land area sufficient?
    Carruthers, Tim J. B.
    Kiskaddon, Erin P.
    Baustian, Melissa M.
    Darnell, Kelly M.
    Moss, Leland C.
    Perry, Carey L.
    Stagg, Camille
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2022, 30 (04)
  • [36] Rethinking Monitoring in Smallholder Carbon Payments for Ecosystem Service Schemes: Devolve Monitoring, Understand Accuracy and Identify Co-benefits
    Wells, Geoff
    Fisher, Janet A.
    Porras, Ina
    Staddon, Sam
    Ryan, Casey
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 139 : 115 - 127
  • [37] China's conservation and restoration of coastal wetlands offset much of the reclamation-induced blue carbon losses
    Fan, Bingxiong
    Li, Yangfan
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2024, 30 (01)
  • [38] Accumulation of glomalin-related soil protein benefits soil carbon sequestration: Tropical coastal forest restoration experiences
    Zhang, Jing
    Li, Jian
    Ma, Lingling
    He, Xinhua
    Liu, Zhanfeng
    Wang, Faming
    Chu, Guowei
    Tang, Xuli
    LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 33 (10) : 1541 - 1551
  • [39] Shifting fire regimes from late to early dry-season fires to abate greenhouse emissions does not completely equate with terrestrial vertebrate biodiversity co-benefits on Cape York Peninsula, Australia
    Perry, Justin J.
    Vanderduys, Eric P.
    Kutt, Alex S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2016, 25 (07) : 742 - 752
  • [40] Unlocking urban blue-green infrastructure: an interdisciplinary literature review analysing co-benefits and synergies between bio-physical and socio-cultural outcomes
    McNabb, Tyler
    Charters, Frances J.
    Challies, Edward
    Dionisio, Rita
    BLUE-GREEN SYSTEMS, 2024, 6 (02) : 217 - 231