Lessons learned on the feasibility of coastal wetland restoration for blue carbon and co-benefits in Australia

被引:2
作者
Hagger, Valerie [1 ]
Stewart-Sinclair, Phoebe [2 ]
Rossini, Renee Anne [1 ]
Adame, Maria Fernanda [3 ]
Glamore, William [4 ]
Lavery, Paul [5 ,6 ]
Waltham, Nathan J. [7 ]
Lovelock, Catherine E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Environm, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Atmospher Res Ltd, Natl Inst Water, Dept Marine Ecol, Hamilton, New Zealand
[3] Griffith Univ, Australian Rivers Inst, Ctr Marine & Coastal Res, Southport, Qld, Australia
[4] Univ New South Wales Sydney, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Water Res Lab, Manly Vale, NSW, Australia
[5] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Sci, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia
[6] Edith Cowan Univ, Ctr Marine Ecosyst Res, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia
[7] James Cook Univ, Coll Sci & Engn, Ctr Trop Water & Aquat Ecosyst Res, Townsville, Qld, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
MANGROVE; MARSH; CONSERVATION; ECOSYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT; GAINS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122287
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Diverse types of saline coastal wetlands contribute significantly to global biodiversity, carbon stocks, and ecosystem functions. Opportunities to incentivise coastal wetland restoration from carbon markets is growing across the world. However, little is known of the economic feasibility of blue carbon restoration across different regions, or the quantities of ecological and social co-benefits that accompany restoration. We explored the opportunities for tidal restoration of coastal wetlands for blue carbon projects in three regions across Australia. We identified biophysically suitable potential restoration sites for mangroves, saltmarshes and supratidal forests, estimated their carbon abatement over 25 years, and undertook a cost-benefit analysis under the carbon market. Potential co-benefits of restoration sites for biodiversity, fisheries, water quality and coastal protection were measured to identify economically feasible sites that maximise the provision of co-benefits. Cultural benefits were identified as the potential for leadership and collaboration by Traditional Custodians at sites. We found that the extent of restoration opportunities varied among regions, with variation in tidal range, extent of agricultural land-use, and the type of hydrological modifications influencing carbon abatement forecasts. The presence of threatened species in hydrologically modified wetlands reduced the amount of land available for restoration, however the restoration of remaining areas could produce rich ecological and cultural benefits. A high carbon price was needed to make blue carbon restoration profitable on land used for beef production. We found sites where carbon credits can be bundled with co-benefits to possibly attain higher carbon prices. Traditional Custodians were interested in leading blue carbon projects, however the opportunity is dependent on Native Title rights. Through comparison of case studies, we developed a regional approach to identify coastal wetland restoration sites for blue carbon and co-benefits that can incorporate local knowledge and data availability, engage with Traditional Custodians, and adapt to the unique characteristics of regions.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Coastal wetland rehabilitation first-pass prioritisation for blue carbon and associated co-benefits
    Rogers, Kerrylee
    Lal, Kirti K.
    Asbridge, Emma F.
    Dwyer, Patrick G.
    MARINE AND FRESHWATER RESEARCH, 2023, 74 (03) : 177 - 199
  • [2] A community-informed transdisciplinary approach to coastal restoration planning: Maximizing the social and ecological co-benefits of wetland creation in Port Fourchon, Louisiana, USA
    Hemmerling, Scott A.
    DeMyers, Christine
    Parfait, Jessica
    Pinero, Edwin
    Baustian, Melissa M.
    Bregman, Martijn
    Di Leonardo, Diana
    Esposito, Christopher
    Georgiou, Ioannis Y.
    Grismore, Audrey
    Jung, Hoonshin
    McMann, Brett
    Miner, Michael D.
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2023, 11
  • [3] Bioeconomic Modelling of Coastal Cod and Kelp Forest Interactions: Co-benefits of Habitat Services, Fisheries and Carbon Sinks
    Vondolia, Godwin K.
    Chen, Wenting
    Armstrong, Claire W.
    Norling, Magnus D.
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2020, 75 (01) : 25 - 48
  • [4] A blue carbon pilot project: Lessons learned
    Mack, Sarah K.
    Lane, Robert R.
    Holland, Kyle
    Bauer, Julian
    Cole, Jeff
    Cowan, Rori
    CARBON MANAGEMENT, 2022, 13 (01) : 420 - 434
  • [5] An opinion on BlueCAM an Australian blue carbon method to estimate climate change mitigation benefits of coastal wetland restoration by Lovelock et al. (2022)
    Gallagher, John Barry
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2023, 31 (08)
  • [6] Opportunities for blue carbon restoration projects in degraded agricultural land of the coastal zone in Queensland, Australia
    Rowland, Phebe I.
    Hagger, Valerie
    Lovelock, Catherine E.
    REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [7] Carbon sequestration and biodiversity co-benefits of preserving forests in the western United States
    Buotte, Polly C.
    Law, Beverly E.
    Ripple, William J.
    Berner, Logan T.
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2020, 30 (02)
  • [8] Co-benefits of protecting mangroves for biodiversity conservation and carbon storage
    Rahman, Md Mizanur
    Zimmer, Martin
    Ahmed, Imran
    Donato, Daniel
    Kanzaki, Mamoru
    Xu, Ming
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 12 (01)
  • [9] Co-benefits and conflicts in alternative stormwater planning: Blue versus green infrastructure?
    Kvamsas, Hanna
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2023, 33 (03) : 232 - 244
  • [10] Natural disturbance impacts on trade-offs and co-benefits of forest biodiversity and carbon
    Mikolas, Martin
    Svitok, Marek
    Bace, Radek
    Meigs, Garrett W.
    Keeton, William S.
    Keith, Heather
    Buechling, Arne
    Trotsiuk, Volodymyr
    Kozak, Daniel
    Bollmann, Kurt
    Begovic, Kresimir
    Cada, Vojtech
    Chaskovskyy, Oleh
    Ralhan, Dheeraj
    Dusatko, Martin
    Ferencik, Matej
    Frankovic, Michal
    Gloor, Rhiannon
    Hofmeister, Jenyk
    Janda, Pavel
    Kameniar, Ondrej
    Labusova, Jana
    Majdanova, Linda
    Nagel, Thomas A.
    Pavlin, Jakob
    Pettit, Joseph L.
    Rodrigo, Ruffy
    Roibu, Catalin-Constantin
    Rydval, Milos
    Sabatini, Francesco M.
    Schurman, Jonathan
    Synek, Michal
    Vostarek, Ondrej
    Zemlerova, Veronika
    Svoboda, Miroslav
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 288 (1961)