Breaking barriers: enhancing construction and demolition waste management in Egyptian residential projects

被引:5
作者
Kineber, Ahmed Farouk [1 ]
Mostafa, Sherif [2 ]
Ali, Ali Hassan [3 ,4 ]
Mohamed, Sherif [5 ]
Daoud, Ahmed Osama [4 ]
机构
[1] Cent Queensland Univ, Coll Project Management Built Environm Asset & Mai, Sch Engn & Technol, 120 Spencer Steet, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
[2] Griffith Univ, Sch Engn & Built Environm, Gold Coast Campus, Gold Coast, Qld 4222, Australia
[3] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Bldg & Real Estate, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] British Univ Egypt BUE, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, El Sherouk City 11837, Egypt
[5] Univ Southern Queensland, Sch Surveying & Built Environm, Springfield Campus, Springfield, Qld 4300, Australia
关键词
Sustainability; Construction and demolition waste management; Barriers; Egypt; Developing nations; PERCEPTIONS; VARIANCE; DRIVERS; SECTOR; IMPACT; CITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10098-024-02999-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Integrating sustainability principles in all stages of construction decision-making is crucial for achieving optimal benefits while maintaining the functionality of residential projects. However, limited research has focused on identifying and analyzing primary barriers to effective construction and demolition waste management (C&DWM) in Egypt's residential construction projects and their impact on sustainable waste management practices. This study aimed to address the question: "What barriers impede the implementation of C&DWM in Egyptian residential projects?" Previous research highlighted general barriers to C&DWM, which were contextualized using a questionnaire survey in the Egyptian building sector. The survey targeted industry practitioners in Egypt, specifically those working in various construction companies with expertise in construction management or civil engineering. The survey received responses from 90 out of 120 participants, resulting in a high response rate of 75%. The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) reveals that barriers to C&DWM can be classified into four distinct constructs: culture, resources, efficiency, and procurement. These constructs were integrated into a model using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). The findings underscore that cultural barriers emerge as the primary hindrance to effective C&DWM implementation, whereas procurement barriers were found to have the least impact. This study makes a substantial academic contribution by providing empirical evidence on the classification and impact of various barriers to C&DWM in a developing country context, specifically Egypt. It introduces a novel application of PLS-SEM to model the relationships between cultural, resource, efficiency, and procurement barriers and their effect on C&DWM implementation. Furthermore, the study offers practical insights and actionable recommendations for policymakers and industry practitioners in developing nations, emphasizing the need for targeted strategies to address these identified barriers. The methodological approach and findings of this study fill a significant gap in the existing literature and can serve as a reference for future research in similar contexts, contributing to the broader discourse on sustainable construction management.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF POLAND, UKRAINE, AND NIGERIA CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTE MANAGEMENT [J].
Emmanuel, Oluwasegun ;
Ghani, Muhammad Usman ;
Nikolaiev, Vsevolod .
CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING REPORTS, 2025, 35 (01)
[22]   Construction and Demolition Waste Management: A Case Study on Romania [J].
Dragan, Gabriela ;
Marinoiu, Ana Maria ;
Voicu-Dorobantu, Roxana .
ENERGY PROBLEMS AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2009, :482-+
[23]   AN INVESTIGATION OF THE GENERATION AND MANAGEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTE IN VIETNAM [J].
Ha Tan Nghiem ;
Quang Minh Phan ;
Kawamoto, Ken ;
Kim Tuan Ngo ;
Hoang Giang Nguyen ;
Tien Dung Nguyen ;
Isobe, Yugo ;
Kawasaki, Mikio .
DETRITUS, 2020, 12 :135-149
[24]   Life cycle assessment of construction and demolition waste management [J].
Butera, Stefania ;
Christensen, Thomas H. ;
Astrup, Thomas F. .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 44 :196-205
[25]   CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTE MANAGEMENT IN THE UAE: APPLICATION AND OBSTACLES [J].
Mawed, Mahmoud ;
Al Nuaimi, Mohamed Samir ;
Kashawni, Ghanim .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMATE, 2020, 18 (70) :235-245
[26]   Construction and demolition waste best management practice in Europe [J].
Galvez-Martos, Jose-Luis ;
Styles, David ;
Schoenberger, Harald ;
Zeschmar-Lahl, Barbara .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 136 :166-178
[27]   Major barriers to information sharing in reverse logistics of construction and demolition waste [J].
Wu, Zezhou ;
Yang, Kaijie ;
Xue, Hong ;
Zuo, Jian ;
Li, Shenghan .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 350
[28]   Enhancing a circular economy for construction and demolition waste management in China: A stakeholder engagement and key strategy approach [J].
Ma, Wenting ;
Li Hao, Jian .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 450
[29]   A Systematic Review of Construction and Demolition Waste Management in Australia: Current Practices and Challenges [J].
Kabirifar, Kamyar ;
Mojtahedi, Mohammad ;
Wang, Cynthia Changxin .
RECYCLING, 2021, 6 (02)
[30]   A bibliometric visual analysis of the system dynamics approach for construction and demolition waste management [J].
Ma, Wenting ;
Yuan, Hongping ;
Hao, Jian Li .
CLEANER WASTE SYSTEMS, 2022, 1