A Comparison of Self-esteem, Body Image, and Depression in Hysterectomized and Non-hysterectomized Iranian Women: A Comparative Cross-sectional Study

被引:0
作者
Ranjbar, Minoo [1 ]
Hasanpour, Shirin [2 ]
Mirghafourvand, Mojgan [3 ]
Rahmani, Vahideh [4 ]
Bani, Soheila [5 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Fac Nursing & Midwifery, Dept Midwifery, Tabriz, Iran
[2] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Imam Reza Hosp, Phys Med & Rehabil Res Ctr, Golgasht St, Tabriz, Iran
[3] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Social Determinants Hlth Res Ctr, Midwifery Dept, Tabriz, Iran
[4] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Womens Reprod Hlth Res Ctr, Tabriz, Iran
[5] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Phys Med & Rehabil Res Ctr, Tabriz, Iran
关键词
Self-esteem; body image; depression; hysterectomy; women; reproductive system; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; UNITED-STATES; HEALTH; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.2174/1573404820666230816141144
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Hysterectomy is one of the factors that may affect women's body image and self-esteem and lead to serious psychological complications. Objective The study aimed to compare self-esteem, body image, and depression in hysterectomized and non-hysterectomized Iranian women. Methods: In this cross-sectional comparative study, 140 women of the reproductive age, who have undergone hysterectomy with benign causes, were compared in terms of self-esteem, body image, and depression with 140 women receiving medical treatment due to abnormal bleeding in educational and medical centers in Tabriz, Iran. Sampling was conducted by convenience method. Self-esteem was assessed with the Rosenberg self-esteem questionnaire, body image was assessed with the multi-dimensional body-self relations questionnaire, and depression was assessed with the Beck II depression inventory. Data were analyzed by Pearson correlation test, independent t-test, chi-square test, and general linear model. Results: The mean (standard deviation) of the body image in hysterectomized and non-hysterectomized women was 235.3 (28.5) and 250.1 (23.4) out of an achievable score of 69-395, respectively. The mean (standard deviation) self-esteem score for hysterectomized women was 20.4 (4.8) and it was 24.2 (3.4) in non-hysterectomized women (out of an achievable score of 0-30). The mean (standard deviation) depression score was 18.1 (9.7) and 5.5 (4.6) out of 0-63 in hysterectomized and non-hysterectomized women, respectively. The differences in self-esteem, body image, and depression variables were statistically significant in hysterectomized and non-hysterectomized women, respectively (P<0.001). Conclusion: According to the results of the present study, the body image and self-esteem in hysterectomized women were low compared to non-hysterectomized women, while the level of depression was high, and this difference was statistically significant.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 72
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Ahmadvand A., 2002, Tehran: Avecinna Cultural Institute
[2]  
Alipour A., 2010, Int J Behavioral Sci, V4, P91
[3]  
Alizadeh T., 2005, J Reprod Infertil, V6, P194
[4]   Quality of life as an outcome measure in gynecologic malignancies [J].
Anderson, B ;
Lutgendorf, S .
CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 12 (01) :21-26
[5]  
Anisi J., 2007, J Res Behavioral Sci, V1, P163
[6]   Body image dissatisfaction and lower self-esteem as major predictors of poor sleep quality in gynecological cancer patients after surgery: cross-sectional study [J].
Aquil, Amina ;
EL Kherchi, Ouassil ;
EL Azmaoui, Naoual ;
Mouallif, Mustapha ;
Guerroumi, Maroua ;
Chokri, Aziz ;
Jayakumar, Arumugam R. ;
Benider, Abdellatif ;
Elgot, Abdeljalil .
BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2021, 21 (01)
[7]  
Badakhsh M., 2009, The effect of hysterectomy in securing sexual desire and satisfaction
[8]   Alternative medical and surgical options to hysterectomy [J].
Banu, NS ;
Manyonda, IT .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2005, 19 (03) :431-449
[9]  
Beck A. T., 1996, BDI-II. Beck Depression Inventory: Second Edition
[10]   Psychometric properties of the Beck Self-Esteem Scales [J].
Beck, AT ;
Brown, GK ;
Steer, RA ;
Kuyken, W ;
Grisham, J .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2001, 39 (01) :115-124