Uptake of the 21-Gene Assay Among Women With Node-Positive, Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer

被引:13
作者
Roberts, Megan C. [1 ]
Kurian, Allison W. [2 ]
Petkov, Valentina I. [1 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK | 2019年 / 17卷 / 06期
关键词
RECURRENCE SCORE ASSAY; CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING; ONCOTYPE DX; TREATMENT RECOMMENDATIONS; IMPACT; CHEMOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.6004/jnccn.2018.7266
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: This study assessed uptake of the Oncotype DX 21-gene assay over time and characterized which sociodemographic and clinical factors are associated with test uptake among women with lymph node-positive (LN+), hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Methods: Invasive breast cancer cases diagnosed in 2010 through 2013 were included from a SEER database linked to 21-gene assay results performed at Genomic Health's Clinical Laboratory. Factors associated with 21-gene assay uptake were identified using a multivariable logistic regression model. Results: Uptake of the 21-gene assay increased over time and differed by race, socioeconomic status (SES), and age. In the multivariable model, when clinical and SES variables were controlled for, racial differences in test uptake were no longer observed. Private insurance status was associated with higher odds of 21-gene assay uptake (Medicaid vs private insurance: adjusted odds ratio, 0.86; P=.02), and high area-level SES was associated with an increased odds of uptake (quintile 5 vs 1: adjusted odds ratio, 1.6; P<.001). Demographic factors such as age and marital status influenced test uptake, and use varied greatly by geographic region. Uptake of the 21-gene assay increased over time and preceded the assay's inclusion in the NCCN Guidelines for LN+ breast cancer. Differences in uptake by race, SES, and age have persisted over time. However, when clinical and SES variables were controlled for, racial differences in assay uptake were no longer observed. Socioeconomic variables, such as health insurance type and area-level SES, were associated with assay uptake. Conclusions: Future research should continue to document practice patterns related to the 21-gene assay. Given variation in testing associated with area-level SES, insurance coverage, and geographic region, interventions to understand and reduce differential uptake are needed to ensure equitable access to this genomic test.
引用
收藏
页码:662 / 668
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Clinical Impact of 21-Gene Recurrence Score on Treatment Decisions for Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive Early Breast Cancer in Korea
    Lee, Moo Hyun
    Han, Wonshik
    Lee, Jeong Eon
    Kim, Ku Sang
    Park, Heeseung
    Kim, Jongjin
    Bae, Soo Youn
    Shin, Hyun Joo
    Lee, Jong Won
    Lee, Eun Sook
    CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2015, 47 (02): : 208 - 214
  • [22] 21-Gene recurrence score and locoregional recurrence in lymph node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer
    Turashvili, Gulisa
    Chou, Joanne F.
    Brogi, Edi
    Morrow, Monica
    Dickler, Maura
    Norton, Larry
    Hudis, Clifford
    Wen, Hannah Y.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 166 (01) : 69 - 76
  • [23] Prognostic Impact of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay Among Young Women With Node-Negative and Node-Positive ER-Positive/HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
    Poorvu, Philip D.
    Gelber, Shari, I
    Rosenberg, Shoshana M.
    Ruddy, Kathryn J.
    Tamimi, Rulla M.
    Collins, Laura C.
    Peppercorn, Jeffrey
    Schapira, Lidia
    Borges, Virginia F.
    Come, Steven E.
    Warner, Ellen
    Jakubowski, Debbie M.
    Russell, Christy
    Winer, Eric P.
    Partridge, Ann H.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (07) : 725 - +
  • [24] Prospective Clinical Utility Study of the Use of the 21-Gene Assay in Adjuvant Clinical Decision Making in Women With Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early Invasive Breast Cancer: Results From the SWITCH Study
    Gligorov, Joseph
    Pivot, Xavier B.
    Jacot, William
    Naman, Herve L.
    Spaeth, Dominique
    Misset, Jean-Louis
    Largillier, Remy
    Sautiere, Jean-Loup
    de Roquancourt, Anne
    Pomel, Christophe
    Rouanet, Philippe
    Rouzier, Roman
    Penault-Llorca, Frederique M.
    ONCOLOGIST, 2015, 20 (08) : 873 - 879
  • [25] The prognostic and predictive role of 21-gene recurrence scores in hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer
    Ahmed, Shahid
    Pati, Sukanya
    Le, Duc
    Haider, Kamal
    Iqbal, Nayyar
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 122 (02) : 144 - 154
  • [26] Clinical analysis of 21-gene recurrence score test in hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer
    Zhu, Lizhe
    Ma, Nan
    Wang, Bin
    Zhou, Can
    Yan, Yu
    Wang, Ke
    He, Jianjun
    Ren, Yu
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2019, 17 (06) : 5469 - 5480
  • [27] Practice patterns and outcomes for patients with node-negative hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and intermediate 21-gene Recurrence Scores
    Jonathan Chen
    Xian Wu
    Paul J. Christos
    Silvia Formenti
    Himanshu Nagar
    Breast Cancer Research, 20
  • [28] Cost-Effectiveness of the 21 Gene Assay in Patients with Node-Positive Breast Cancer
    Fischer, L.
    Arnold, M.
    Kirsch, F.
    Leidl, R.
    GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2016, 78 (11) : 772 - 780
  • [29] Clinical relevance of the 21-gene Recurrence Score® assay in treatment decisions for patients with node-positive breast cancer in the genomic era
    Mamounas, Eleftherios P.
    Russell, Christy A.
    Lau, Anna
    Turner, Michelle P.
    Albain, Kathy S.
    NPJ BREAST CANCER, 2018, 4
  • [30] Individualizing Adjuvant Therapy in Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Node-Positive Breast Cancer
    Gogineni, Keerthi
    Kalinsky, Kevin
    JCO ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2022, 18 (04) : 247 - +