Development of a multiplex droplet digital PCR assay for simultaneous detection and quantification of Escherichia coli, E. marmotae, and E. ruysiae in water samples

被引:3
|
作者
Moinet, Marie [1 ]
Collis, Rose M. [1 ]
Rogers, Lynn [1 ,2 ]
Devane, Megan L. [3 ]
Biggs, Patrick J. [2 ,4 ]
Stott, Rebecca [5 ]
Marshall, Jonathan [6 ]
Muirhead, Richard [7 ]
Cookson, Adrian L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] AgResearch Ltd, Hopkirk Res Inst, Food Syst Integr Team, Tennent Dr, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
[2] Massey Univ, Hopkirk Res Inst, Sch Vet Sci, MEpiLab, Tennent Dr, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
[3] Inst Environm Sci & Res Ltd ESR, 27 Creyke Rd, Christchurch 8041, New Zealand
[4] Massey Univ, Sch Nat Sci, Tennent Dr, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
[5] Natl Inst Water & Atmospher Res NIWA, Gate 10 Silverdale Rd, Hamilton 3216, New Zealand
[6] Massey Univ, Sch Math & Computat Sci, Tennent Dr, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
[7] AgResearch Ltd, Ethical Agr, 176 Puddle Alley, Mosgiel 9092, New Zealand
关键词
Absolute quantification; Digital PCR; Fecal indicator organisms; Naturalized Escherichia; Quantitation methods; Water microbial quality; GENETIC-STRUCTURE; QUANTITATIVE PCR; BACTERIA; STRAINS;
D O I
10.1016/j.mimet.2024.106909
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Escherichia coli are widely used by water quality managers as Fecal Indicator Bacteria, but current quantification methods do not differentiate them from benign, environmental Escherichia species such as E. marmotae (formerly named cryptic clade V) or E. ruysiae (cryptic clades III and IV). Reliable and specific techniques for their identification are required to avoid confounding microbial water quality assessments. To address this, a multiplex droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay targeting lipB (E. coli and E. ruysiae) and bglC (E. marmotae) was designed. The ddPCR performance was assessed using in silico analysis; genomic DNA from 40 local, international, and reference strains of target and non-target coliforms; and spiked water samples in a range relevant to water quality managers (1 to 1000 cells/100 mL). Results were compared to an analogous quantitative PCR (qPCR) and the Colilert method. Both PCR assays showed excellent sensitivity with a limit of detection of 0.05 pg/mu L and 0.005 pg/mu l for ddPCR and qPCR respectively, and of quantification of 0.5 pg/mu L of genomic DNA. The ddPCR allowed differentiation and quantification of three Escherichia species per run by amplitude multiplexing and showed a high concordance with concentrations measured by Colilert once proportional bias was accounted for. In silico specificity testing underlined the possibility to further detect and distinguish Escherichia cryptic clade VI. Finally, the applicability of the ddPCR was successfully tested on environmental water samples where E. marmotae and E. ruysiae potentially confound E. coli counts based on the Most Probable Number method, highlighting the utility of this novel ddPCR as an efficient and rapid discriminatory test to improve water quality assessments.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative Use of Quantitative PCR (qPCR), Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR), and Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (RPA) in the Detection of Shiga Toxin-Producing E. coli (STEC) in Environmental Samples
    Ibekwe, Mark A.
    Murinda, Shelton E.
    Park, Stanley
    Obayiuwana, Amarachukwu
    Murry, Marcia A.
    Schwartz, Gregory
    Lundquist, Trygve
    WATER, 2020, 12 (12) : 1 - 15
  • [42] Detection of Exiguobacterium spp. and E. acetylicum on fresh-cut leafy vegetables by a multiplex PCR assay
    Hu, Antuo
    Gao, Cancan
    Lu, Zhaoxin
    Lu, Fengxia
    Kong, Liangyu
    Bie, Xiaomei
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2021, 180
  • [43] Digital Holographic Interferometric In-Vitro Imaging of Escherichia coli (E. coli) bacteria
    Rastogi, Vivek
    Gadkari, Rahul
    Agarwal, Shilpi
    Dubey, Satish Kumar
    Shakher, Chandra
    HOLOGRAPHY: ADVANCES AND MODERN TRENDS VI, 2019, 11030
  • [44] An automated, robotic biosensor for the electrochemical detection of E. coli in water
    Kellner, Karlheinz
    Ettenauer, Joerg
    Zuser, Karen
    Posnicek, Thomas
    Brandl, Martin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 30TH ANNIVERSARY EUROSENSORS CONFERENCE - EUROSENSORS 2016, 2016, 168 : 594 - 597
  • [45] A Novel Method for E. Coli Contamination Detection in Underground Water
    Kamand, Sahar
    Hage-Diab, Ali
    Al Khatib, Ali
    31ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MICROELECTRONICS (IEEE ICM 2019), 2019, : 62 - 65
  • [46] Biochip with E. coli bacteria for detection of arsenic in drinking water
    Theytazi, J.
    Braschler, T.
    van Lintel, H.
    Renaud, P.
    Diesel, E.
    Merulla, D.
    van der Meer, J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE EUROSENSORS XXIII CONFERENCE, 2009, 1 (01): : 1003 - +
  • [47] Use of Personal Glucose Meters for the detection of E. coli in water
    Chavali, R.
    Gunda, N. S. K.
    Naicker, S.
    Mitra, S. K.
    CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL SENSORS 11 -AND- MEMS-NEMS 11, 2014, 64 (01): : 167 - 171
  • [48] Standardisation of an In-house Multiplex PCR Assay for Identifying Diffusely Adherent E. coli and ESBL Producing Resistant Isolates
    Madalgi, Radhika Kishor
    Kulkarni, Sughosh
    Ajantha, Ganavalli Subramanya
    Ramlal, Shylaja
    Aradhya, Shruthi
    Kulkarni, R. D.
    JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2024, 18 (01): : 211 - 218
  • [49] A biosensor platform for rapid detection of E. coli in drinking water
    Hesari, Nikou
    Alum, Absar
    Elzein, Mohamad
    Abbaszadegan, Morteza
    ENZYME AND MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 83 : 22 - 28
  • [50] Detection of E. coli O157:H7 experimentally inoculated in raw milk samples by conventional method and multiplex PCR
    Garcia, P. M.
    Arcuri, E. F.
    Brito, M. A. V. P.
    Lange, C. C.
    Brito, J. R. F.
    Cerqueira, M. M. O. P.
    ARQUIVO BRASILEIRO DE MEDICINA VETERINARIA E ZOOTECNIA, 2008, 60 (05) : 1241 - 1249