Development of a multiplex droplet digital PCR assay for simultaneous detection and quantification of Escherichia coli, E. marmotae, and E. ruysiae in water samples

被引:3
|
作者
Moinet, Marie [1 ]
Collis, Rose M. [1 ]
Rogers, Lynn [1 ,2 ]
Devane, Megan L. [3 ]
Biggs, Patrick J. [2 ,4 ]
Stott, Rebecca [5 ]
Marshall, Jonathan [6 ]
Muirhead, Richard [7 ]
Cookson, Adrian L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] AgResearch Ltd, Hopkirk Res Inst, Food Syst Integr Team, Tennent Dr, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
[2] Massey Univ, Hopkirk Res Inst, Sch Vet Sci, MEpiLab, Tennent Dr, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
[3] Inst Environm Sci & Res Ltd ESR, 27 Creyke Rd, Christchurch 8041, New Zealand
[4] Massey Univ, Sch Nat Sci, Tennent Dr, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
[5] Natl Inst Water & Atmospher Res NIWA, Gate 10 Silverdale Rd, Hamilton 3216, New Zealand
[6] Massey Univ, Sch Math & Computat Sci, Tennent Dr, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
[7] AgResearch Ltd, Ethical Agr, 176 Puddle Alley, Mosgiel 9092, New Zealand
关键词
Absolute quantification; Digital PCR; Fecal indicator organisms; Naturalized Escherichia; Quantitation methods; Water microbial quality; GENETIC-STRUCTURE; QUANTITATIVE PCR; BACTERIA; STRAINS;
D O I
10.1016/j.mimet.2024.106909
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Escherichia coli are widely used by water quality managers as Fecal Indicator Bacteria, but current quantification methods do not differentiate them from benign, environmental Escherichia species such as E. marmotae (formerly named cryptic clade V) or E. ruysiae (cryptic clades III and IV). Reliable and specific techniques for their identification are required to avoid confounding microbial water quality assessments. To address this, a multiplex droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay targeting lipB (E. coli and E. ruysiae) and bglC (E. marmotae) was designed. The ddPCR performance was assessed using in silico analysis; genomic DNA from 40 local, international, and reference strains of target and non-target coliforms; and spiked water samples in a range relevant to water quality managers (1 to 1000 cells/100 mL). Results were compared to an analogous quantitative PCR (qPCR) and the Colilert method. Both PCR assays showed excellent sensitivity with a limit of detection of 0.05 pg/mu L and 0.005 pg/mu l for ddPCR and qPCR respectively, and of quantification of 0.5 pg/mu L of genomic DNA. The ddPCR allowed differentiation and quantification of three Escherichia species per run by amplitude multiplexing and showed a high concordance with concentrations measured by Colilert once proportional bias was accounted for. In silico specificity testing underlined the possibility to further detect and distinguish Escherichia cryptic clade VI. Finally, the applicability of the ddPCR was successfully tested on environmental water samples where E. marmotae and E. ruysiae potentially confound E. coli counts based on the Most Probable Number method, highlighting the utility of this novel ddPCR as an efficient and rapid discriminatory test to improve water quality assessments.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] GENOTYPING OF VIRULENCE FACTORS IN AVIAN PATHOGENIC E. COLI BY MULTIPLEX PCR
    Shtylla, Tana
    Circella, Elena
    Kumbe, Ilirian
    Cabeli, Pranvera
    Shoshi, Natalia
    Camarda, Antonio
    COMPTES RENDUS DE L ACADEMIE BULGARE DES SCIENCES, 2012, 65 (12): : 1759 - 1766
  • [22] A one-step multiplex PCR-based assay for simultaneous detection and classification of virulence factors to identify five diarrheagenic E. coli pathotypes
    Ohmura-Hoshino, Mari
    Miyaki, Yuki
    Yashima, Shigeko
    HELIYON, 2022, 8 (08)
  • [23] Multiplex PCR assay for the simultaneous detection of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella spp. from fresh produce
    Hur, J.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2011, 101 (06) : S77 - S77
  • [24] Molecular testing devices for on-site detection of E. coli in water samples
    Carlos Manzanas
    Elise Morrison
    Young S. Kim
    Morteza Alipanah
    George Adedokun
    Shouguang Jin
    Todd Z. Osborne
    Z. Hugh Fan
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [25] Molecular testing devices for on-site detection of E. coli in water samples
    Manzanas, Carlos
    Morrison, Elise
    Kim, Young S.
    Alipanah, Morteza
    Adedokun, George
    Jin, Shouguang
    Osborne, Todd Z.
    Fan, Z. Hugh
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [26] DETECTION AND QUANTIFICATION OF E. COLI AND COLIFORM BACTERIA IN WATER SAMPLES WITH A NEW METHOD BASED ON FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDISATION
    Huegler, Michael
    Boeckle, Karin
    Eberhagen, Ingrid
    Thelen, Karin
    Beimfohr, Claudia
    Hambsch, Beate
    SIGNIFICANCE OF FAECAL INDICATORS IN WATER: A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE, 2012, : 123 - 130
  • [27] Simultaneous detection and differentiation of Entamoeba histolytica, E. dispar, E. moshkovskii, Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium spp. in human fecal samples using multiplex PCR and qPCR-MCA
    Zebardast, Nozhat
    Yeganeh, Farshid
    Gharavi, Mohammad Javad
    Abadi, Alireza
    Tabaei, Seyyed Javad Seyyed
    Haghighi, Ali
    ACTA TROPICA, 2016, 162 : 233 - 238
  • [28] Fishing, trapping and killing of Escherichia coli (E. coli) in potable water
    Dasgupta, Saumyadeb
    Gunda, Naga Siva Kumar
    Mitra, Sushanta K.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-WATER RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 2 (06) : 931 - 941
  • [29] The Clinical Significance of Enteropathogenic E. coli detected in Stool Multiplex PCR Assays
    Mowers, Jonathan
    Lamps, Laura W.
    Greenson, Joel
    Bachman, Michael
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2018, 98 : 290 - 290
  • [30] Identification by multiplex PCR of phylogeny and papG alleles in uropathogenic E. coli strains
    Giray, Betul
    Ucar, Fusun
    CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2011, 22 : S103 - S103