Post-fire management decisions have consequences: Drill-seeding disturbance and effects of co-seeding introduced with native bunchgrasses

被引:2
作者
Davies, Kirk W. [1 ]
Boyd, Chad S. [1 ]
Svejcar, Lauren N. [1 ]
Martyn, Trace E. [2 ]
Bates, Jon D. [1 ]
机构
[1] ARS, USDA, 67826-A Hwy 205, Burns, OR 97720 USA
[2] Oregon State Univ, Eastern Oregon Agr Res Ctr, Union, OR 97883 USA
来源
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION | 2024年 / 53卷
关键词
Cheatgrass; Crested wheatgrass; Exotic annual grasses; Native bunchgrasses; Native forbs; Resistance; CHEATGRASS BROMUS-TECTORUM; SAGEBRUSH-STEPPE; ARTEMISIA-TRIDENTATA; COMPETITIVE ABILITY; SOIL DISTURBANCE; ARID RANGELAND; SAGE-GROUSE; GRASS; FIRE; VEGETATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03021
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Wildfires and the demand for post-fire seeding are increasing in the sagebrush ecosystem threatened by invasive annual grasses. Drill-seeding bunchgrasses after wildfire is a common strategy for limiting annual grasses. However, there are concerns that the soil disturbance associated with drill-seeding may negatively impact the plant community, particularly if seeded species fail to establish. Similarly, there are worries that co-seeding introduced bunchgrasses with natives, to hedge against low native bunchgrass establishment, may limit native bunchgrass success. We investigated the effects of the disturbance of drill-seeding and the impacts of coseeding introduced bunchgrasses after wildfire in sagebrush communities at four sites up to six years post-seeding. The disturbance of drill-seeding increased invasive annual grasses from -10 % to >15 % cover and increased its density by >200 plants center dot m(- 2) by the end of the study. Bunchgrasses appeared to not be influenced by the disturbance of drill-seeding; however, drillseeding slightly reduced perennial forb density. These results suggest that restoration practitioners need to consider potential negative consequences of drill-seeding, especially when and where selected plant materials may fail to establish in high abundance. Co-seeding introduced bunchgrasses with native bunchgrasses limited native bunchgrasses and also slightly decreased native perennial forbs. However, co-seeding introduced bunchgrasses reduced invasive annual grasses by -50 %, while seeding only native bunchgrasses did not reduce annual grasses. These findings suggest that co-seeding introduced and native bunchgrasses may not be advisable. We suggest: 1) If native bunchgrasses are unlikely to establish in high abundance, then introduced bunchgrasses should be used, and 2) If seeded native bunchgrasses are likely to meet management objectives, then introduced bunchgrasses should not be co-seeded. Additional investigations are needed in other areas to determine the applicability of the results of this study to the larger sagebrush ecosystem. Clearly, the potential consequences of post-fire management will need to be considered as restoration plans are developed, but additional research is needed to better inform management decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] Impact of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire across western US forests
    Abatzoglou, John T.
    Williams, A. Park
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2016, 113 (42) : 11770 - 11775
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, Sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) conservation objectives: final report
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, Web soil survey
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2020, PRISM Climate Group Database
  • [5] Introduced annual grass increases regional fire activity across the arid western USA (1980-2009)
    Balch, Jennifer K.
    Bradley, Bethany A.
    D'Antonio, Carla M.
    Gomez-Dans, Jose
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2013, 19 (01) : 173 - 183
  • [6] Diet composition, forage selection, and potential for forage competition among elk, deer, and livestock on aspen-sagebrush summer range
    Beck, JL
    Peek, JM
    [J]. RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2005, 58 (02) : 135 - 147
  • [7] Establishing Cool-Season Grasses on a Degraded Arid Rangeland of the Colorado Plateau
    Bernstein, Eli J.
    Albano, Christine M.
    Sisk, Thomas D.
    Crews, Timothy E.
    Rosenstock, Steve
    [J]. RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2014, 22 (01) : 57 - 64
  • [8] Postfire seeding for erosion control: Effectiveness and impacts on native plant communities
    Beyers, JL
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2004, 18 (04) : 947 - 956
  • [9] Challenges of Establishing Big Sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) in Rangeland Restoration: Effects of Herbicide, Mowing, Whole-Community Seeding, and Sagebrush Seed Sources
    Brabec, Martha M.
    Germino, Matthew J.
    Shinneman, Douglas J.
    Pilliod, David S.
    McIlroy, Susan K.
    Arkle, Robert S.
    [J]. RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2015, 68 (05) : 432 - 435
  • [10] What makes Great Basin sagebrush ecosystems invasible by Bromus tectorum?
    Chambers, Jeanne C.
    Roundy, Bruce A.
    Blank, Robert R.
    Meyer, Susan E.
    Whittaker, A.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 2007, 77 (01) : 117 - 145