Long-Term Use of Muscle Relaxant Medications for Chronic Pain

被引:1
作者
Oldfield, Benjamin J. [1 ,2 ]
Gleeson, Brynna [3 ]
Morford, Kenneth L. [1 ]
Adams, Zoe [4 ]
Funaro, Melissa C. [5 ]
Becker, William C. [1 ,6 ]
Merlin, Jessica S. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Yale Sch Med, Dept Med, Program Addict Med, New Haven, CT 06513 USA
[2] Fair Haven Community Hlth Care, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Virginia Tech Carilion Sch Med, Roanoke, VA USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Med, Boston, MA USA
[5] Yale Univ, Harvey Cushing John Hay Whitney Med Lib, New Haven, CT USA
[6] VA Connecticut Healthcare Syst, Pain Res Informat Multimorbid & Educ PRIME Ctr, West Haven, CT USA
[7] Univ Pittsburgh, Challenges Managing & Preventing Pain Clin Res Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[8] Univ Pittsburgh, Ctr Res Hlth Care, Div Gen Internal Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
LOW-BACK-PAIN; TENSION-TYPE HEADACHE; DOUBLE-BLIND; UNITED-STATES; EDUCATIONAL OUTREACH; CARISOPRODOL SOMA; LEG CRAMPS; PLACEBO; TIZANIDINE; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.34835
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Importance Stricter opioid prescribing guidelines have increased prescriptions of skeletal muscle relaxants (SMRs) for chronic pain, but the efficacy of long-term use of SMRs for chronic pain is unknown. Objective To systematically review the effectiveness or efficacy of long-term use of SMRs for chronic pain. Evidence Review Two reviewers systematically searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase (Ovid), Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane through December 4, 2023. They included articles published in English, Spanish, or Italian. Only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and cohort studies with comparator groups evaluating at least 1-month duration of SMRs for chronic pain were included. The reviewers dually reviewed data abstraction, risk-of-bias, and quality. They characterized studies by chronic pain syndrome: low back pain, fibromyalgia, headaches, painful cramps or spasticity, and other syndromes. Findings A total of 30 RCTs with 1314 participants and 14 cohort studies with 1168 participants assessed SMRs for chronic pain. Studies were primarily short-term (4-6 weeks). Nine unique SMRs were represented by the studies identified. Eleven studies (25%) examined baclofen, 8 (18%) examined tizanidine, and 7 (16%) examined cyclobenzaprine. Evidence for effectiveness was strongest for SMRs used for trigeminal neuralgia, neck pain, and painful cramps; evidence suggested SMRs for fibromyalgia, low back pain, and other syndromes were not more beneficial than placebo. The most common adverse effects were sedation and dry mouth. RCTs had a low to moderate risk of bias, and the quality of cohort studies was fair to good. Conclusions and Relevance In this systematic review of long-term use of SMRs for chronic pain, findings suggest that their long-term use may benefit patients with painful spasms or cramps and neck pain; their long-term use for low back pain, fibromyalgia, and headaches did not appear to be beneficial. Clinicians should be vigilant for adverse effects and consider deprescribing if pain-related goals are not met.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [1] Orphenadrine in treatment of muscle cramps in cirrhotic patients: a randomized study
    Abd-Elsalam, Sherief
    Ebrahim, Shaimaa
    Soliman, Shaimaa
    Alkhalawany, Walaa
    Elfert, Asem
    Hawash, Nehad
    Elkadeem, Mahmoud
    Badawi, Rehab
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 32 (08) : 1042 - 1045
  • [2] Randomized-controlled trial of methocarbamol as a novel treatment for muscle cramps in cirrhotic patients
    Abd-Elsalam, Sherief
    Arafa, Mona
    Elkadeem, Mahmoud
    Elfert, Asem
    Soliman, Shaimaa
    Elkhalawany, Walaa
    Badawi, Rehab
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2019, 31 (04) : 499 - 502
  • [3] [Anonymous], Covidence Systematic Review Software
  • [4] [Anonymous], National Pain Strategy: A comprehensive population health strategy for pain
  • [5] [Anonymous], PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews [Internet]
  • [6] Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation versus baclofen in spasticity: Clinical and electrophysiologic comparison
    Aydin, G
    Tomruk, S
    Keles, I
    Demir, SO
    Orkun, S
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2005, 84 (08) : 584 - 592
  • [7] BAKRIS GL, 1982, ILLINOIS MED J, V161, P106
  • [8] A COMPARISON OF CYCLOBENZAPRINE AND PLACEBO IN THE MANAGEMENT OF FIBROSITIS - A DOUBLE-BLIND CONTROLLED-STUDY
    BENNETT, RM
    GATTER, RA
    CAMPBELL, SM
    ANDREWS, RP
    CLARK, SR
    SCAROLA, JA
    [J]. ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1988, 31 (12): : 1535 - 1542
  • [9] A DOUBLE-BLIND-STUDY OF BENORYLATE AND CHLORMEZANONE IN MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE
    BERRY, H
    LIYANAGE, SP
    DURANCE, RA
    GOODE, JD
    SWANNELL, AJ
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY AND REHABILITATION, 1981, 20 (01): : 46 - 49
  • [10] The efficacy and safety of eperisone in patients with cervical spondylosis: Results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Bose, K
    [J]. METHODS AND FINDINGS IN EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 21 (03): : 209 - 213