Machine Learning Assisted Tensile Strength Prediction and Optimization of Ti Alloy

被引:1
作者
Fatriansyah, Jaka Fajar [1 ,2 ]
Aqila, Muhamad Rafi [1 ]
Suhariadi, Iping [3 ]
Federico, Andreas [1 ]
Ajiputro, Dzaky Iman [1 ]
Pradana, Agrin Febrian [1 ]
Andreano, Yossi [1 ]
Rizky, Muhammad Ali Yafi [1 ]
Dhaneswara, Donanta [1 ,2 ]
Lockman, Zainovia [4 ]
Hur, Su-Mi [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Indonesia, Dept Met & Mat Engn, Fac Engn, Depok 16424, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
[2] Univ Indonesia, Fac Engn, AMRC, Depok 16424, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
[3] Bina Nusantara Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Ind Engn, Jakarta 11480, Indonesia
[4] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Mat & Mineral Resources Engn, Engn Campus, Perai 14300, Penang, Malaysia
[5] Chonnam Natl Univ, Sch Polymer Sci & Engn, Gwangju 61186, South Korea
来源
IEEE ACCESS | 2024年 / 12卷
关键词
Metals; Titanium alloys; Mathematical models; Predictive models; Data models; Machine learning; Nearest neighbor methods; Tensile stress; Ti alloy; mechanical property; tensile strength; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; REGRESSION; TITANIUM; DEFORMATION;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3450511
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Understanding the link between material composition and mechanical properties is crucial for material design and optimization. This study utilized four machine learning models-K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN)-to predict tensile strength and examine how alloying composition affects the tensile strength of titanium (Ti) alloys. The first three models are considered simpler machine learning approaches, while the ANN is a deep learning method. The models were trained on publicly available experimental data, using fifteen alloying elements as inputs: Al, C, Cr, Cu, H, Fe, Mo, Ni, Nb, N, O, Si, Sn, V, and Zr. A new framework was proposed for evaluating the best model, which involves running several ML models, assessing metrics such as R2 value, absolute percentage error distribution, and stability of R2 through multiple trials, and finally comparing model accuracy using the Diebold-Mariano test. The evaluation showed that all four models achieved good accuracy, with R2 values above 80%. However, the framework identified KNN as the best model due to its low error rate, the narrowest range in absolute percentage error, and more stable R2 value. Additionally, the feature importance analysis highlighted how alloying elements impact tensile strength, revealing both linear and non-linear correlations. It was found that increasing Ti content and using alloying elements with an atomic radius smaller than Ti affect the tensile strength. This study illustrates the potential of machine learning in material screening and design for Ti alloys.
引用
收藏
页码:119660 / 119670
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] An empirical comparison of conventional techniques, neural networks and the three stage hybrid Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) model for credit scoring analysis: The case of Turkish credit card data
    Akkoc, Soner
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 222 (01) : 168 - 178
  • [2] Is your dataset big enough? Sample size requirements when using artificial neural networks for discrete choice analysis
    Alwosheel, Ahmad
    van Cranenburgh, Sander
    Chorus, Caspar G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2018, 28 : 167 - 182
  • [3] Effect of Vanadium Contents on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Ti-6Al-xV Components Produced by Wire plus Arc Additive Manufacturing
    An, Feipeng
    Zhang, Binbin
    Yan, Yangyang
    Wang, Lin
    [J]. MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS, 2021, 62 (08) : 1071 - 1078
  • [4] Banerjee M., 2023, Advances in Additive Manufacturing and Metal Joining: Proceedings of AIMTDR 2021. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, P211, DOI 10.1007/978-981-19-7612-4_18
  • [5] Bottou L., 1991, Proc. Neuro-Nimes, V91, P12
  • [6] ANN-Based Adaptive Control of Robotic Manipulators With Friction and Joint Elasticity
    Chaoui, Hicham
    Sicard, Pierre
    Gueaieb, Wail
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2009, 56 (08) : 3174 - 3187
  • [7] Chen G, 2016, NAT MATER, V15, P876, DOI [10.1038/nmat4677, 10.1038/NMAT4677]
  • [8] Support vector regression with genetic algorithms in forecasting tourism demand
    Chen, Kuan-Yu
    Wang, Cheng-Hua
    [J]. TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2007, 28 (01) : 215 - 226
  • [9] XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
    Chen, Tianqi
    Guestrin, Carlos
    [J]. KDD'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2016, : 785 - 794
  • [10] The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation
    Chicco, Davide
    Warrens, Matthijs J.
    Jurman, Giuseppe
    [J]. PEERJ COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2021,