SCIENCE IN THE JURISPRUDENCE OF THE US S UPREME COURT : A RELATIONSHIP IN THE DARK

被引：0

作者：

Baraggia, Antonia ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Milan, Diritto Pubbl Comparato, Milan, Italy

来源：

BIOLAW JOURNAL-RIVISTA DI BIODIRITTO | 2024年 / 02期

关键词：

US Supreme Court; science; abortion; courts; amicus curiae;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

This contribution aims to highlight the multiple tensions in the relationship between science and the Supreme Court through an analysis of the jurisprudential strand on the regulation of abortion, in the belief that some of the trends of this paradigmatic jurisprudence can also be extended to other areas of intersection between science and law.

引用

页码：27 / 40

页数：14

共 36 条

[1] Medical Evidence and Expertise in Abortion Jurisprudence [J].

Ahmed, Aziza .

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LAW & MEDICINE, 2015, 41 (01) :85-118

[2]

[Anonymous], 1993, DAUBERT MERRELL DOW

[3]

[Anonymous], 2014, PLANNED PARENTHOOD G

[4]

[Anonymous], 1992, Planned Parenthood of S.E Pennsylvania v. Casey

[5]

[Anonymous], 2024, Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration

[6]

[Anonymous], 2013, Assoc. for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., P596

[7]

[Anonymous], 2017, Moore v. Texas

[8]

[Anonymous], 1997, Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702

[9]

[Anonymous], 2022, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, 597 U.S.

[10]

[Anonymous], 2012, Missouri v. Galin E. Frye

← 1 2 3 4 →