Protein-Based Predictive Biomarkers to Personalize Neoadjuvant Therapy for Bladder Cancer-A Systematic Review of the Current Status

被引:0
作者
Bedore, Stacy [1 ]
van der Eerden, Joshua [1 ]
Boghani, Faizan [1 ,2 ]
Patel, Saloni J. [1 ]
Yassin, Samer [1 ,3 ]
Aguilar, Karina [1 ]
Lokeshwar, Vinata B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Augusta Univ, Med Coll Georgia, Dept Biochem & Mol Biol, 1410 Laney Walker Blvd, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
bladder cancer; neoadjuvant therapy; lineage plasticity; protein-based biomarkers; systematic review; prognostic markers; tumor heterogeneity; ALDEHYDE DEHYDROGENASE 1; STEM-CELL MARKERS; UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA; MOLECULAR SUBTYPES; LUMINAL SUBTYPES; BCL-2; EXPRESSION; PROSTATE-CANCER; POOR-PROGNOSIS; HER2; STATUS; PHASE-II;
D O I
10.3390/ijms25189899
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The clinical outcome of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is poor despite the approval of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or immunotherapy to improve overall survival after cystectomy. MIBC subtypes, immune, transcriptome, metabolomic signatures, and mutation burden have the potential to predict treatment response but none have been incorporated into clinical practice, as tumor heterogeneity and lineage plasticity influence their efficacy. Using the PRISMA statement, we conducted a systematic review of the literature, involving 135 studies published within the last five years, to identify studies reporting on the prognostic value of protein-based biomarkers for response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with MIBC. The studies were grouped based on biomarkers related to molecular subtypes, cancer stem cell, actin-cytoskeleton, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, apoptosis, and tumor-infiltrating immune cells. These studies show the potential of protein-based biomarkers, especially in the spatial context, to reduce the influence of tumor heterogeneity on a biomarker's prognostic capability. Nevertheless, currently, there is little consensus on the methodology, reagents, and the scoring systems to allow reliable assessment of the biomarkers of interest. Furthermore, the small sample size of several studies necessitates the validation of potential prognostic biomarkers in larger multicenter cohorts before their use for individualizing neoadjuvant therapy regimens for patients with MIBC.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Catalog of prognostic tissue-based biomarkers in patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: a systematic review
    Laukhtina, Ekaterina
    Pradere, Benjamin
    Mori, Keiichiro
    Schuettfort, Victor M.
    Quhal, Fahad
    Mostafaei, Hadi
    Motlangh, Reza Sari
    Katayama, Satoshi
    Grossmann, Nico C.
    Moschini, Marco
    Enikeev, Dmitry
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 39 (03) : 180 - 190
  • [2] Photodynamic therapy for prostate cancer-a review of current status and future promise
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Pendse, Doug
    Emberton, Mark
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE UROLOGY, 2009, 6 (01): : 18 - 30
  • [3] Photodynamic Therapy for the Treatment and Diagnosis of Cancer-A Review of the Current Clinical Status
    Gunaydin, Gurcan
    Gedik, M. Emre
    Ayan, Seylan
    FRONTIERS IN CHEMISTRY, 2021, 9
  • [4] Exploring novel protein-based biomarkers for advancing breast cancer diagnosis: A review
    Vellan, Christina Jane
    Islam, Tania
    De Silva, Sumadee
    Taib, Nur Aishah Mohd
    Prasanna, Galhena
    Jayapalan, Jaime Jacqueline
    CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2024, 129
  • [5] IMMUNOREACT 0: Biopsy-based immune biomarkers as predictors of response to neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer-A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Stepanyan, Astghik
    Fassan, Matteo
    Spolverato, Gaya
    Castagliuolo, Ignazio
    Scarpa, Melania
    Scarpa, Marco
    IMMUNOREACT Study Grp
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (17): : 17878 - 17890
  • [6] Current status of genetic urinary biomarkers for surveillance of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review
    Lozano, F.
    Raventos, C. X.
    Carrion, A.
    Trilla, E.
    Morote, J.
    BMC UROLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [7] Current status of the prognostic molecular biomarkers in breast cancer: A systematic review
    Kutomi, Goro
    Mizuguchi, Toru
    Satomi, Fukino
    Maeda, Hideki
    Shima, Hiroaki
    Kimura, Yasutoshi
    Hirata, Koichi
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2017, 13 (03) : 1491 - 1498
  • [8] Prognostic blood-based biomarkers in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: A systematic review
    Laukhtina, Ekaterina
    Pradere, Benjamin
    Mori, Keiichiro
    Schuettfort, Victor M.
    Quhal, Fahad
    Mostafaei, Hadi
    Motlagh, Reza Sari
    Aydh, Abdulmajeed
    Moschini, Marco
    Enikeev, Dmitry
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Abufaraj, Mohammad
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 39 (08) : 471 - 479
  • [9] Blood-based circulating microRNAs as potential biomarkers for predicting the prognosis of head and neck cancer-a systematic review
    Patil, Shankargouda
    Warnakulasuriya, Saman
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 24 (11) : 3833 - 3841
  • [10] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cisplatin Based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
    Benkhadra, Raed
    Nayfeh, Tarek
    Patibandla, Sai Krishna
    Peterson, Chelsea
    Prokop, Larry
    Alhalabie, Omar
    Murad, M. Hassan
    Mao, Shifeng S.
    BLADDER CANCER, 2022, 8 (01) : 5 - 17