Cognitive Task Analysis: Eliciting Expert Cognition in Context

被引:3
作者
Brown, Olivia [1 ]
Power, Nicola [2 ]
Gore, Julie [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bath, Sch Management, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Dept Psychol, Liverpool, England
[3] Birkbeck Univ London, Sch Business Econ & Informat, London, England
关键词
qualitative approaches; interviewing; field research; context; CRITICAL DECISION METHOD; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; ENTREPRENEURIAL COGNITION; PSYCHOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS; MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE; LEADERSHIP; FUTURE; PRACTITIONERS;
D O I
10.1177/10944281241271216
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Cognitive Task Analysis (CTA) is a powerful methodological approach that can enhance the rigorous elicitation and documentation of complex cognitive processes within interview-based qualitative research. We provide insights into this set of semi-structured interviewing techniques that we contend have much to offer management researchers who wish to understand the complexities of expert cognition within specific work-related tasks. Distinct from traditional semi-structured interview methods, CTA is designed to identify the knowledge requirements underpinning expertise in complex work domains. First, we present CTA as a robust approach to eliciting complex cognition and note why, when, and where management scholars might best use its techniques. Second, we provide two examples of how CTA methods have been used to research management; specifically, using the Critical Decision Method to explore management in high-stakes environments, and Applied Cognitive Task Analysis to explore global leadership. In ending, we propose greater use of this pragmatic approach in management research and highlight potential avenues for future research that will advance understanding of complex cognition at work.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 404
页数:30
相关论文
共 184 条
[1]   Cognitive biases and decision-making strategies in times of change: a systematic literature review [J].
Acciarini, Chiara ;
Brunetta, Federica ;
Boccardelli, Paolo .
MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2021, 59 (03) :638-652
[2]   Innovation management measurement: A review [J].
Adams, R ;
Bessant, J ;
Phelps, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2006, 8 (01) :21-47
[3]   'If something doesn't look right, go find out why': how intuitive decision making is accomplished in police first-response [J].
Akinci, Cinla ;
Sadler-Smith, Eugene .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 29 (01) :78-92
[4]   Collective Intuition: Implications for Improved Decision Making and Organizational Learning [J].
Akinci, Cinla ;
Sadler-Smith, Eugene .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2019, 30 (03) :558-577
[5]   Intuition in Management Research: A Historical Review [J].
Akinci, Cinla ;
Sadler-Smith, Eugene .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2012, 14 (01) :104-122
[6]  
Alvesson M, 2007, ACAD MANAGE REV, V32, P1265, DOI 10.5465/AMR.2007.26586822
[7]  
Anand S., 2022, IDIOSYNCRATIC DEALS, P309, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-88516-813
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1988, The nature of expertise
[9]   Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms [J].
Argote, L ;
Ingram, P .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2000, 82 (01) :150-169
[10]   INTEGRATING EMOTIONS AND AFFECT IN THEORIES OF MANAGEMENT [J].
Ashkanasy, Neal M. ;
Humphrey, Ronald H. ;
Quy Nguyen Huy .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2017, 42 (02) :175-189