Asthma diagnosis: a comparison of established diagnostic guidelines in adults with respiratory symptoms

被引:1
|
作者
Simpson, Andrew J. [1 ]
Drake, Sarah [2 ]
Healy, Laura [2 ]
Wang, Ran [2 ,3 ]
Bennett, Miriam [3 ]
Wardman, Hannah [3 ]
Durrington, Hannah [2 ,3 ]
Fowler, Stephen J. [2 ,3 ]
Murray, Clare S. [2 ,3 ]
Simpson, Angela [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hull, Sch Sport Exercise & Rehabil Sci, Kingston Upon Hull, England
[2] Manchester Univ NHS Fdn Trust, Manchester, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Biol Sc, Div Immunol Immun Infect & Resp Med, Manchester, England
关键词
Asthma; Diagnosis; Guidelines;
D O I
10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102813
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Considerable variability exists between asthma diagnostic guidelines. We tested the performance characteristics of the European Respiratory Society (ERS), the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines for the diagnosis of asthma in adults. Methods In this prospective observational study (ISRCTN-11676160, - 11676160, May 2019-June - June 2022), participants referred from primary care with clinician-suspected asthma underwent comprehensive investigation including: spirometry, bronchodilator reversibility, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, peak expiratory fl ow variability, bronchial challenge testing with methacholine and mannitol, and responsiveness to inhaled corticosteroid therapy. Results were reviewed by a panel of asthma specialists to determine asthma diagnosis (reference standard) and compared to each diagnostic test and the ERS, NICE and GINA diagnostic algorithms (index tests). The sensitivity, specificity, fi city, positive predictive and negative predictive values were calculated. Findings One hundred and forty adults were enrolled and 118 given a definitive fi nitive diagnostic outcome [75 female; mean (SD) age 36 (12) years; 70 (59%) with asthma] and included in the analysis. Sensitivity of individual tests was poor (15-62%), - 62%), but they provided good specificity fi city at the most stringent thresholds (range: 88-100%). - 100%). The sensitivity/ specificity fi city of ERS, NICE and GINA was 81/85%, 41/100% and 47/100%, respectively. Concordance between guidelines was only moderate (Cohen's ' s Kappa 0.45-0.51). - 0.51). Interpretation Current guidelines for the diagnosis of asthma in adults provide either excellent specificity fi city but low sensitivity (GINA and NICE) or only reasonable sensitivity and specificity fi city (ERS). All guidelines therefore have limitations with regards to their clinical application; new guidelines are needed but should be tested prospectively before roll out.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Managing asthma in the outpatient clinic: Is the diagnosis of asthma confirmed objectively according to guidelines?
    Stensen, Lise
    Porsbjerg, Celeste
    Sverrild, Asger
    Jensen, Birgitte Nybo
    Vibeke, Backer
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2012, 40
  • [32] The prevalence of asthma symptoms in middle aged Australian adults
    Abramson, Michael J.
    Valente, Michael
    Minh Thi Hong Le
    Khung, Su-Wei
    Benke, Geza
    Dharmage, Shyamali
    Thompson, Bruce
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2012, 40
  • [33] Prevalence of asthma and asthma symptoms in a nationally-representative sample of adults in England
    Kearney, Matt
    Mindell, Jenny
    Craig, Rachel
    Hall, Julia
    Clarke, Joanne
    Thompson, Bronwen
    Moger, Anne
    Holton, Kevin
    Winter, Robert
    Hill, Sue
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2012, 40
  • [34] Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma in Older Adults
    Al-Alawi, Mazen
    Hassan, Tidi
    Chotirmall, Sanjay H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 127 (05) : 370 - 378
  • [35] Diagnosis of asthma: diagnostic testing
    Brigham, Emily P.
    West, Natalie E.
    INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2015, 5 : S27 - S30
  • [36] The assessment of validity of different asthma diagnostic tools in adults
    Yurdakul, AS
    Dursun, B
    Canbakan, S
    Çakaloglu, A
    Çapan, N
    JOURNAL OF ASTHMA, 2005, 42 (10) : 843 - 846
  • [37] Comparison of guidelines and self-management plans in asthma
    Meijer, RJ
    Kerstjens, HAM
    Postma, DS
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 1997, 10 (05) : 1163 - 1172
  • [38] Prevalence of asthma symptoms, diagnosis and treatment use in Romania
    Bumbacea, Dragos
    Ionita, Diana
    Ciobanu, Magda
    Tudose, Cornelia
    Bogdan, Miron Alexandru
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2013, 42
  • [39] Prevalence of atopy, asthma symptoms and diagnosis, and the management of asthma: comparison of an affluent and a non-affluent country
    Faniran, AO
    Peat, JK
    Woolcock, AJ
    THORAX, 1999, 54 (07) : 606 - 610
  • [40] Prevalence of work-aggravated symptoms in clinically established asthma
    Saarinen, K
    Karjalainen, A
    Martikainen, R
    Uitti, J
    Tammilehto, L
    Klaukka, T
    Kurppa, K
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2003, 22 (02) : 305 - 309