A quantitative analysis of vertebrate environmental DNA degradation in soil in response to time, UV light, and temperature

被引:4
作者
Guthrie, Austin M. [1 ]
Cooper, Christine E. [2 ]
Bateman, Philip W. [3 ]
van Der Heyde, Mieke [1 ]
Allentoft, Morten E. [4 ,5 ]
Nevill, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Sch Mol & Life Sci, Trace & Environm DNA TrEnD Lab, MBioMe Mine Site Biomonitoring Using eDNA Res Grp, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
[2] Curtin Univ, Sch Mol & Life Sci, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] Curtin Univ, Sch Mol & Life Sci, Behav Ecol Lab, Perth, WA, Australia
[4] Curtin Univ, Sch Mol & Life Sci, Trace & Environm DNA TrEnD Lab, Perth, WA, Australia
[5] Univ Copenhagen, Lundbeck Fdn GeoGenet Ctr, Globe Inst, Copenhagen, Denmark
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL DNA | 2024年 / 6卷 / 04期
关键词
degradation; environmental DNA; soil; terrestrial; vertebrate; ULTRAVIOLET-RADIATION; ACCUMULATION; PENETRATION; PERSISTENCE; ADEQUATE;
D O I
10.1002/edn3.581
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Environmental DNA (eDNA) degradation influences the effectiveness of eDNA-based biodiversity monitoring, but the factors that determine the rate of decay of eDNA in terrestrial environments are poorly understood. We assessed the persistence of vertebrate eDNA from a mock vertebrate community created with soil from zoo enclosures holding 10 target species from different taxonomic classes (reptiles, birds, and mammals) and of different biomass (little penguin and giraffe). We examined species detection rates resulting from eDNA metabarcoding, as well as relative eDNA concentrations via qPCR, from soil samples over eight time points (0-12 weeks), during exposure to three ambient temperatures (10, 25, and 40 degrees C) and three levels of ultraviolet B (UV-B) radiation (0%, 50%, and 100% intensity). We recorded considerable variation in detectability between species, independent of temperature, and UV-B effects. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) indicated degradation of eDNA over time for all temperature and UV treatments, although it was still possible to detect eDNA from some species after 12 weeks. Degradation rates were lowest for high UV-B treatments, presumably due to UV-B reducing bacterial metabolism. The temperatures investigated did not influence eDNA decay. Our results indicate that eDNA in soil can persist under a range of temperatures and high UV radiation for longer than expected. Sheltered sites with minimal UV-B radiation, which have previously been considered ideal sites for terrestrial eDNA collection, may not be optimal for eDNA persistence in some cases due to microbial decay. A better understanding of eDNA degradation in terrestrial environments is needed to enhance the accuracy of eDNA metabarcoding for surveying terrestrial vertebrate communities. We assessed the persistence of vertebrate eDNA from a mock vertebrate community created with soil from zoo enclosures holding 10 target species from different taxonomic classes (reptiles, birds, and mammals) and of different biomass (little penguin and giraffe). Quantitative polymerase chain reaction indicated degradation of eDNA over time for all temperature and UV treatments, with degradation rates lowest for high UV-B treatments, presumably due to UV-B-reducing bacterial metabolism. Sheltered sites with minimal UV-B radiation, which have previously been considered ideal sites for terrestrial eDNA collection, may not be optimal for eDNA persistence in some cases due to microbial decay, and a better understanding of terrestrial eDNA degradation is needed to improve the accuracy of soil eDNA metabarcoding for surveying of terrestrial vertebrate communities.image
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] A Brief Review of Non-Avian Reptile Environmental DNA (eDNA), with a Case Study of Painted Turtle (Chrysemys picta) eDNA Under Field Conditions
    Adams, Clare I. M.
    Hoekstra, Luke A.
    Muell, Morgan R.
    Janzen, Fredric J.
    [J]. DIVERSITY-BASEL, 2019, 11 (04):
  • [2] Meta-barcoding of 'dirt' DNA from soil reflects vertebrate biodiversity
    Andersen, Kenneth
    Bird, Karen Lise
    Rasmussen, Morten
    Haile, James
    Breuning-Madsen, Henrik
    Kjaer, Kurt H.
    Orlando, Ludovic
    Gilbert, M. Thomas P.
    Willerslev, Eske
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2012, 21 (08) : 1966 - 1979
  • [3] Andrews S., 2010, FASTQC AQUALITY CONT
  • [4] Plant biodiversity assessment through soil eDNA reflects temporal and local diversity
    Ariza, Maria
    Fouks, Bertrand
    Mauvisseau, Quentin
    Halvorsen, Rune
    Alsos, Inger Greve
    de Boer, Hugo J.
    [J]. METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2023, 14 (02): : 415 - 430
  • [5] The ecology of environmental DNA and implications for conservation genetics
    Barnes, Matthew A.
    Turner, Cameron R.
    [J]. CONSERVATION GENETICS, 2016, 17 (01) : 1 - 17
  • [6] Environmental Conditions Influence eDNA Persistence in Aquatic Systems
    Barnes, Matthew A.
    Turner, Cameron R.
    Jerde, Christopher L.
    Renshaw, Mark A.
    Chadderton, W. Lindsay
    Lodge, David M.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (03) : 1819 - 1827
  • [7] Environmental DNA for wildlife biology and biodiversity monitoring
    Bohmann, Kristine
    Evans, Alice
    Gilbert, M. Thomas P.
    Carvalho, Gary R.
    Creer, Simon
    Knapp, Michael
    Yu, Douglas W.
    de Bruyn, Mark
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2014, 29 (06) : 358 - 367
  • [8] Soil moisture as a factor affecting the microbiological and biochemical activity of soil
    Borowik, A.
    Wyszkowska, J.
    [J]. PLANT SOIL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 62 (06) : 250 - 255
  • [9] OBITOOLS: a UNIX-inspired software package for DNA metabarcoding
    Boyer, Frederic
    Mercier, Celine
    Bonin, Aurelie
    Le Bras, Yvan
    Taberlet, Pierre
    Coissac, Eric
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2016, 16 (01) : 176 - 182
  • [10] Optimising sampling and analysis protocols in environmental DNA studies
    Buxton, Andrew
    Matechou, Eleni
    Griffin, Jim
    Diana, Alex
    Griffiths, Richard A.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01):