Trends in surgical outcomes for Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis construction using a large nationwide database

被引:0
|
作者
Habermann, Alyssa [1 ]
Gassie, Hannah [1 ]
Rustom, Salem [1 ]
Wieghard, Nicole E. [1 ]
Wexner, Steven D. [2 ]
Sharp, Stephen P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Med Ctr, Div Colon & Rectal Surg, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Florida, Ellen Leifer Shulman & Steven Shulman Digest Dis C, Dept Colorectal Surg, Weston, FL USA
关键词
ileal pouch-anal anastomosis; J pouch; minimally invasive surgery; ulcerative colitis; INFLAMMATORY-BOWEL-DISEASE; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; ULCERATIVE-COLITIS; RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY; ILEOANAL POUCH; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; COLECTOMY;
D O I
10.1111/codi.17188
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim: Ulcerative colitis (UC) affects over 3 million (1.3%) US adults, approximately 20% of whom will require surgery. Since it was first described in 1978, restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become the gold standard for patients requiring surgery, as well as for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). In 1991 the laparoscopic approach to IPAA was introduced. The aim of this study was to evaluate the advances made in IPAA as minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has become more prevalent. Method: The American College of Surgeons NSQIP database from 2005 to 2019 was used. Laparoscopic (MIS) and open cases of IPAA construction for UC or FAP were used. These patients were subdivided into three time point cohorts: early (2005-2009), middle (2010-2014) and recent (2015-2019). Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate morbidity, mortality and hospital length of stay. Results: A total of 6184 patients were analysed, and 2555 underwent MIS while 3629 underwent open surgery. After multivariable analysis, the MIS approach was associated with a lower risk of morbidity compared with open procedures [relative risk (RR) = 0.86, p < 0.0001, 95% CI 0.78-0.94], both in the early and recent periods [early period = RR = 0.66 (p < 0.0001), recent period RR = 0.78 (p = 0.0029)]. Superficial surgical site infection (SSI) was consistently lower in the MIS cohort across all three time periods. After multivariable analysis, the overall RR of superficial SSI in the MIS cohort was 0.41 (p < 0.0001) [early period RR = 0.35 (p < 0.0001), middle period RR = 0.55 (p = 0.0007), recent period RR = 0.31 (p < 0.0001)]. The RR of deep space SSI was decreased overall (RR = 0.58, p = 0.013, 95% CI 0.62-0.93), with the most significant effect occurring during the early period (RR = 0.30, p = 0.0260, 95% CI 0.105-0.868). Sepsis related to any infective aetiology was also decreased in the MIS cohort (RR = 0.76, p = 0.0093, 95% CI 0.62-0.93), especially in the recent time period (RR = 0.63, p = 0.0344, 95% CI 0.41-0.97). Furthermore, hospital length of stay was decreased in the MIS cohort (-0.287 days, p = 0.0170), with a greater difference occurring in the more recent cohort (-0.375 days, p = 0.0418). Conclusion: With increasing utilization of minimally invasive techniques in IPAA creation there have been significant decreases in the rates of morbidity including decreasing rates of superficial and deep space SSI, as well as decreased hospital length of stay.
引用
收藏
页码:1950 / 1958
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Outcomes after transanal proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in adolescents
    Kjaer, Soeren
    Bulut, Orhan
    PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 39 (01)
  • [32] Association of Malnutrition with Postoperative Outcomes after Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis
    Juliet June Ray
    Eren Esen
    Sarah McIntyre
    Hasan T. Kirat
    Michael Grieco
    Feza Remzi
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2021, 25 : 1562 - 1564
  • [33] Ethnic Variation Trends in the Use of Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis
    Hashash, Jana G.
    Mourad, Fadi H.
    Odah, Tarek
    Farraye, Francis A.
    Kroner, Paul
    Stocchi, Luca
    CROHNS & COLITIS 360, 2023, 5 (04)
  • [34] Early and late surgical outcomes of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis within a defined population in Sweden
    Dafnis, George
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 28 (07) : 842 - 849
  • [35] Nuances of Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis
    Church, James
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2022, 65 : S41 - S44
  • [36] SOCIAL AND SEXUAL FUNCTION FOLLOWING ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSIS
    DAMGAARD, B
    WETTERGREN, A
    KIRKEGAARD, P
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1995, 38 (03) : 286 - 289
  • [37] Hospital Readmission Rates after Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis
    Datta, Indraneel
    Buie, W. Donald
    MacLean, Anthony R.
    Heine, John A.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2009, 52 (01) : 55 - 58
  • [38] Impact of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis on the surgical outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis
    Obusez, Emmanuel C.
    Lian, Lei
    Shao, Zhuo
    Navaneethan, Udayakumar
    O'Shea, Robert
    Kiran, Ravi P.
    Shen, Bo
    JOURNAL OF CROHNS & COLITIS, 2013, 7 (03) : 230 - 238
  • [39] Outcomes and Management of the Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in the Elderly
    James Q. Zhou
    Sean Michael Duenas
    Tarik Kirat
    Feza Remzi
    Shannon Chang
    Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology, 2018, 16 (3) : 275 - 288
  • [40] The Incidence of Pouch Neoplasia Following Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
    Urquhart, Siri A.
    Comstock, Bryce P.
    Jin, Mauricio F.
    Day, Courtney N.
    Eaton, John E.
    Harmsen, William S.
    Raffals, Laura E.
    Loftus, Edward, V
    Coelho-Prabhu, Nayantara
    INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES, 2024, 30 (02) : 183 - 189