Trends in surgical outcomes for Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis construction using a large nationwide database

被引:0
|
作者
Habermann, Alyssa [1 ]
Gassie, Hannah [1 ]
Rustom, Salem [1 ]
Wieghard, Nicole E. [1 ]
Wexner, Steven D. [2 ]
Sharp, Stephen P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Med Ctr, Div Colon & Rectal Surg, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Florida, Ellen Leifer Shulman & Steven Shulman Digest Dis C, Dept Colorectal Surg, Weston, FL USA
关键词
ileal pouch-anal anastomosis; J pouch; minimally invasive surgery; ulcerative colitis; INFLAMMATORY-BOWEL-DISEASE; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; ULCERATIVE-COLITIS; RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY; ILEOANAL POUCH; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; COLECTOMY;
D O I
10.1111/codi.17188
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim: Ulcerative colitis (UC) affects over 3 million (1.3%) US adults, approximately 20% of whom will require surgery. Since it was first described in 1978, restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become the gold standard for patients requiring surgery, as well as for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). In 1991 the laparoscopic approach to IPAA was introduced. The aim of this study was to evaluate the advances made in IPAA as minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has become more prevalent. Method: The American College of Surgeons NSQIP database from 2005 to 2019 was used. Laparoscopic (MIS) and open cases of IPAA construction for UC or FAP were used. These patients were subdivided into three time point cohorts: early (2005-2009), middle (2010-2014) and recent (2015-2019). Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate morbidity, mortality and hospital length of stay. Results: A total of 6184 patients were analysed, and 2555 underwent MIS while 3629 underwent open surgery. After multivariable analysis, the MIS approach was associated with a lower risk of morbidity compared with open procedures [relative risk (RR) = 0.86, p < 0.0001, 95% CI 0.78-0.94], both in the early and recent periods [early period = RR = 0.66 (p < 0.0001), recent period RR = 0.78 (p = 0.0029)]. Superficial surgical site infection (SSI) was consistently lower in the MIS cohort across all three time periods. After multivariable analysis, the overall RR of superficial SSI in the MIS cohort was 0.41 (p < 0.0001) [early period RR = 0.35 (p < 0.0001), middle period RR = 0.55 (p = 0.0007), recent period RR = 0.31 (p < 0.0001)]. The RR of deep space SSI was decreased overall (RR = 0.58, p = 0.013, 95% CI 0.62-0.93), with the most significant effect occurring during the early period (RR = 0.30, p = 0.0260, 95% CI 0.105-0.868). Sepsis related to any infective aetiology was also decreased in the MIS cohort (RR = 0.76, p = 0.0093, 95% CI 0.62-0.93), especially in the recent time period (RR = 0.63, p = 0.0344, 95% CI 0.41-0.97). Furthermore, hospital length of stay was decreased in the MIS cohort (-0.287 days, p = 0.0170), with a greater difference occurring in the more recent cohort (-0.375 days, p = 0.0418). Conclusion: With increasing utilization of minimally invasive techniques in IPAA creation there have been significant decreases in the rates of morbidity including decreasing rates of superficial and deep space SSI, as well as decreased hospital length of stay.
引用
收藏
页码:1950 / 1958
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ileal pouch salvage following failed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis
    Saltzberg, SS
    DiEdwardo, C
    Scott, TE
    LaMorte, WW
    Stucchi, AF
    Becker, JM
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 1999, 3 (06) : 633 - 640
  • [22] Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: long-term outcomes and trends over time in a low-volume institution
    Horan, Jack
    Brannigan, Ann
    Mulsow, Jurgen
    Shields, Conor
    Cahill, Ronan
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 190 (01) : 143 - 149
  • [23] Functional outcome of stapled ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis versus handsewn pouch-anal anastomosis
    Naoto Saigusa
    Takayuki Kurahashi
    Toshio Nakamura
    Haruhiko Sugimura
    Shozo Baba
    Hiroyuki Konno
    Satoshi Nakamura
    Surgery Today, 2000, 30 : 575 - 581
  • [24] Restorative Proctocolectomy and Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis
    Parc, Yann
    Reboul-Marty, Jeanne
    Lefevre, Jeremie H.
    Shields, Conor
    Chafai, Najim
    Tiret, Emmanuel
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 262 (05) : 849 - 854
  • [25] Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: the Australasian experience
    Rickard, M. J. F. X.
    Young, C. J.
    Bissett, I. P.
    Stitz, R.
    Solomon, M. J.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2007, 9 (02) : 139 - 145
  • [26] Staging Considerations for the Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis
    Olortegui, Kinga Skowron
    Graham, Ada
    Hyman, Neil
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2022, 26 (07) : 1531 - 1536
  • [27] DIRECT ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSIS
    BRAUN, J
    SCHUMPELICK, V
    CHIRURG, 1993, 64 (08): : 614 - 621
  • [28] Laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis
    Jani, Kalpesh
    Shah, Amit
    JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2015, 11 (03) : 177 - 183
  • [29] Adjunctive Pharmacotherapy Use in Patients With Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis (IPAA)
    Nyabanga, Custon T.
    Axelrad, Jordan E.
    Zhang, Xian
    Barnes, Edward L.
    Chang, Shannon
    CROHNS & COLITIS 360, 2020, 2 (04) : 1 - 7
  • [30] Association of Malnutrition with Postoperative Outcomes after Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis
    Ray, Juliet June
    Esen, Eren
    McIntyre, Sarah
    Kirat, Hasan T.
    Grieco, Michael
    Remzi, Feza
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2021, 25 (06) : 1562 - 1564