A Conceptualization of Mood Influences on Group Judgment and Decision Making: The Key Function of Dominant Cognitive Processing Strategies

被引:0
作者
Hinsz, Verlin B. [1 ]
Robinson, Michael D. [1 ]
机构
[1] North Dakota State Univ, Psychol, Fargo, ND USA
关键词
positive mood; negative mood; group decision; group judgment; cognitive processing; affect; cognitive strategy; information processing; HIDDEN PROFILES; GROUP POLARIZATION; SOCIAL DILEMMAS; BASE-RATE; INDIVIDUAL-PERFORMANCE; PERSUASIVE ARGUMENTS; INFORMATION; EMOTION; INTERGROUP; MODEL;
D O I
10.1177/10464964241274124
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This conceptualization describes how positive and negative mood states, information processing, cognitive processing strategies, and group interaction combine to influence group judgment and decision making. The crux of the conceptualization is a dominant cognitive processing strategy. Positive moods inform group members that the situation is benign and reinforce dominant cognitive processing strategies. Negative moods provide feedback that the situation is problematic, leading to inhibition or revision of dominant cognitive processing strategies. Moods achieve these impacts through their influences on the cognitive processes of attention, processing objectives, and cognitive representations. Group interaction also accentuates these cognitive processes and related strategies. This conceptualization is applied to understand mood influences on jury decision making, group social dilemmas, hidden profile tasks, group judgments of opinions, judgments with cognitive biases, and quantitative judgments. The discussion considers mood influences in other group judgment and decision making related phenomena of group brainstorming, intergroup negotiation, stress, and groupthink.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 113
页数:43
相关论文
共 159 条
[1]   The structure of current affect: Controversies and emerging consensus [J].
Barrett, LF ;
Russell, AA .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1999, 8 (01) :10-14
[2]   Group Affect: Its Influence on Individual and Group Outcomes [J].
Barsade, Sigal G. ;
Gibson, Donald E. .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 21 (02) :119-123
[3]   Attentional Selection Is Biased Toward Mood-Congruent Stimuli [J].
Becker, Mark W. ;
Leinenger, Mallorie .
EMOTION, 2011, 11 (05) :1248-1254
[4]   Sadness and susceptibility to judgmental bibs: The case of anchoring [J].
Bodenhausen, GV ;
Gabriel, S ;
Lineberger, M .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2000, 11 (04) :320-323
[5]   Centrality and accuracy in group quantity estimations [J].
Bonner, BL ;
Gonzalez, CM ;
Sommer, D .
GROUP DYNAMICS-THEORY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2004, 8 (03) :155-165
[6]   Jury Decision Making: Implications For and From Psychology [J].
Bornstein, Brian H. ;
Greene, Edie .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 20 (01) :63-67
[7]   COOPERATION IN INTERGROUP AND SINGLE-GROUP SOCIAL DILEMMAS [J].
BORNSTEIN, G ;
BENYOSSEF, M .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 30 (01) :52-67
[8]  
Bramesfeld KD, 2008, BRIT J SOC PSYCHOL, V47, P285, DOI 10.1348/000712607X218295
[9]  
Brauer M., 1996, EUROPEAN REV SOCIAL, V7, P173, DOI DOI 10.1080/14792779643000010
[10]  
Brodbeck FC, 2007, ACAD MANAGE REV, V32, P459, DOI 10.5465/AMR.2007.24351441