Dosimetric Correlation of Acute Radiation Dermatitis in Patients With Breast Cancer Undergoing Hypofractionated Proton Beam Therapy Using Pencil Beam Scanning

被引:0
|
作者
Huang, Eng-Yen [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Ho, Meng Wei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Yu-Ming [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Kaohsiung Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, 129 Dapi Rd, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] Kaohsiung Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Proton & Radiat Therapy Ctr, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[4] Natl Sun Yat Sen Univ, Coll Med, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Sch Med,Dept Radiat Oncol, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[5] Chang Gung Univ, Sch Tradit Chinese Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
关键词
Breast Neoplasms; Proton Therapy; Radiation Dose Hypofractionation; Radiodermatitis; Radiotherapy Dosage; INITIAL REPORT; RADIOTHERAPY; IRRADIATION; TOXICITY; OUTCOMES; SKIN;
D O I
10.4048/jbc.2024.0012
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Pencil-beam scanning (PBS) is a modern delivery technique used in proton beam therapy (PBT) to reduce normal tissue reactions. No dosimetric correlation between dermatitis and PBS has been reported for breast cancer. The current study aimed to investigate the factors associated with grade 2 or higher dermatitis in patients with breast cancer undergoing PBT using PBS. Methods: The medical data of 42 patients with breast cancer who underwent adjuvant radiotherapy between December 2019 and September 2023 were reviewed. All patients received hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT), either 26 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE])/five fractions or 40.05 or 43.5 Gy (RBE)/15 fractions, for the whole breast/chest wall with or without nodal irradiation. The duration of acute radiation dermatitis was defined as within 90 days from the start of radiotherapy. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were used for univariate and multivariate analyses of the actuarial rates of grade 2-3 dermatitis. Results: Twenty-two (52.4%) and 20 (47.6%) patients were diagnosed with grade 1 and 2 dermatitis, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed a clinical target volume (CTV) >= of 320 cc (p = 0.035) and a skin dose of D10cc >= 38.3 Gy (RBE) (p = 0.009) as independent factors of grade 2 dermatitis. The 10-week cumulative grade 2 dermatitis rates were 88.2%, 39.4%, and 8.3% (p < 0.001) for patients with both high, either high, and neither high CTV and D10cc, respectively. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on dosimetric correlations for dermatitis in patients with breast cancer who underwent hypofractionated PBT using PBS. In the era of HFRT, skin dose modulation using PBS may reduce the incidence of dermatitis.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 200
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Robustness and dosimetric verification of hippocampal-sparing craniospinal pencil beam scanning proton plans for pediatric medulloblastoma
    Edvardssona, Anneli
    Gorgisyan, Jenny
    Anderssonc, Karin M.
    Dahlgren, Christina Vallhagen
    Dasu, Alexandru
    Gram, Daniel
    Bjork-Eriksson, Thomas
    Rosenschold, Per Munck af
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 29
  • [32] Radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy breast cancer plans
    Rana, Suresh
    Greco, Kevin
    Samuel, E. James Jebaseelan
    Bennouna, Jaafar
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 20 (08): : 36 - 46
  • [33] Pencil beam scanning proton therapy for pediatric intracranial ependymoma
    Ares, Carmen
    Albertini, Francesca
    Frei-Welte, Martina
    Bolsi, Alessandra
    Grotzer, Michael A.
    Goitein, Gudrun
    Weber, Damien C.
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2016, 128 (01) : 137 - 145
  • [34] Pencil beam scanning proton therapy for pediatric intracranial ependymoma
    Carmen Ares
    Francesca Albertini
    Martina Frei-Welte
    Alessandra Bolsi
    Michael A. Grotzer
    Gudrun Goitein
    Damien C. Weber
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2016, 128 : 137 - 145
  • [35] Proton pencil-beam scanning radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer: dosimetric parameters and 2-year results
    Kubeš Jiří
    Vondráček Vladimír
    Andrlik Michal
    Navrátil Matěj
    Sláviková Silvia
    Vítek Pavel
    Dědečková Kateřina
    Prausová Jana
    Ondrová Barbora
    Rotnáglová Eliška
    Lukeš Petr
    Patzelt Matěj
    Grebenyuk Alexander
    Rosina Jozef
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2021, 278 : 763 - 769
  • [36] Gantry-based pencil beam scanning proton therapy for uveal melanoma: IMPT versus proton arc therapy
    Qi, Hang
    Hu, Lei
    Huang, Sheng
    Lee, Yen-Po
    Yu, Francis
    Chen, Qing
    Yang, Yunjie
    Kang, Minglei
    Zhai, Huifang
    Vermeulen, Milo
    Shim, Andy
    Park, Peter
    Ding, Xuanfeng
    Zhou, Jun
    Abramson, David H.
    Francis, Jasmine H.
    Simone, Charles B.
    Barker, Christopher A.
    Lin, Haibo
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2025, 20 (01)
  • [37] Investigating beam matching for multi-room pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Rana, Suresh
    Bennouna, Jaafar
    PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2020, 43 (04) : 1241 - 1251
  • [38] Investigating beam matching for multi-room pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Suresh Rana
    Jaafar Bennouna
    Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2020, 43 : 1241 - 1251
  • [39] Proton beam therapy delivered using pencil beam scanning vs. passive scattering/uniform scanning for localized prostate cancer: Comparative toxicity analysis of PCG 001-09
    Mishra, Mark, V
    Khairnar, Rahul
    Bentzen, Soren M.
    Larson, Gary
    Tsai, Henry
    Sinesi, Christopher
    Vargas, Carlos
    Laramore, George
    Rossi, Carl
    Rosen, Lane
    Zhu, Mingyao
    Hartsell, William
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 19 : 80 - 86
  • [40] 4DMRI-based investigation on the interplay effect for pencil beam scanning proton therapy of pancreatic cancer patients
    Dolde, Kai
    Zhang, Ye
    Chaudhri, Naved
    David, Christian
    Kachelriess, Marc
    Lomax, Antony John
    Naumann, Patrick
    Saito, Nami
    Weber, Damien Charles
    Pfaffenberger, Asja
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 14 (1)