Dosimetric Correlation of Acute Radiation Dermatitis in Patients With Breast Cancer Undergoing Hypofractionated Proton Beam Therapy Using Pencil Beam Scanning

被引:0
|
作者
Huang, Eng-Yen [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Ho, Meng Wei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Yu-Ming [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Kaohsiung Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, 129 Dapi Rd, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] Kaohsiung Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Proton & Radiat Therapy Ctr, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[4] Natl Sun Yat Sen Univ, Coll Med, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Sch Med,Dept Radiat Oncol, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[5] Chang Gung Univ, Sch Tradit Chinese Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
关键词
Breast Neoplasms; Proton Therapy; Radiation Dose Hypofractionation; Radiodermatitis; Radiotherapy Dosage; INITIAL REPORT; RADIOTHERAPY; IRRADIATION; TOXICITY; OUTCOMES; SKIN;
D O I
10.4048/jbc.2024.0012
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Pencil-beam scanning (PBS) is a modern delivery technique used in proton beam therapy (PBT) to reduce normal tissue reactions. No dosimetric correlation between dermatitis and PBS has been reported for breast cancer. The current study aimed to investigate the factors associated with grade 2 or higher dermatitis in patients with breast cancer undergoing PBT using PBS. Methods: The medical data of 42 patients with breast cancer who underwent adjuvant radiotherapy between December 2019 and September 2023 were reviewed. All patients received hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT), either 26 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE])/five fractions or 40.05 or 43.5 Gy (RBE)/15 fractions, for the whole breast/chest wall with or without nodal irradiation. The duration of acute radiation dermatitis was defined as within 90 days from the start of radiotherapy. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were used for univariate and multivariate analyses of the actuarial rates of grade 2-3 dermatitis. Results: Twenty-two (52.4%) and 20 (47.6%) patients were diagnosed with grade 1 and 2 dermatitis, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed a clinical target volume (CTV) >= of 320 cc (p = 0.035) and a skin dose of D10cc >= 38.3 Gy (RBE) (p = 0.009) as independent factors of grade 2 dermatitis. The 10-week cumulative grade 2 dermatitis rates were 88.2%, 39.4%, and 8.3% (p < 0.001) for patients with both high, either high, and neither high CTV and D10cc, respectively. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on dosimetric correlations for dermatitis in patients with breast cancer who underwent hypofractionated PBT using PBS. In the era of HFRT, skin dose modulation using PBS may reduce the incidence of dermatitis.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 200
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of dose engine algorithm in pencil beam scanning proton therapy for breast cancer
    Tommasino, Francesco
    Fellin, Francesco
    Lorentini, Stefano
    Farace, Paolo
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 50 : 7 - 12
  • [2] Techniques for Treating Bilateral Breast Cancer Patients Using Pencil Beam Scanning Technology
    Vyfhuis, Melissa A. L.
    Zhu, Mingyao
    Agyepong, Benjamin
    Nichols, Elizabeth M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PARTICLE THERAPY, 2019, 6 (02) : 1 - 11
  • [3] Dosimetric delivery validation of dynamically collimated pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Nelson, Nicholas P.
    Culberson, Wesley S.
    Hyer, Daniel E.
    Geoghegan, Theodore J.
    Patwardhan, Kaustubh A.
    Smith, Blake R.
    Flynn, Ryan T.
    Yu, Jen
    Gutierrez, Alonso N.
    Hill, Patrick M.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (05):
  • [4] The dosimetric enhancement of GRID profiles using an external collimator in pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Smith, Blake R.
    Nelson, Nicholas P.
    Geoghegan, Theodore J.
    Patwardhan, Kaustubh A.
    Hill, Patrick M.
    Yu, Jen
    Gutierrez, Alonso N.
    Allen, Bryan G.
    Hyer, Daniel E.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (04) : 2684 - 2698
  • [5] Determination of surface dose in pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Kern, A.
    Baeumer, C.
    Kroeninger, K.
    Mertens, L.
    Timmermann, B.
    Walbersloh, J.
    Wulff, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (05) : 2277 - 2288
  • [6] An approach for estimating dosimetric uncertainties in deformable dose accumulation in pencil beam scanning proton therapy for lung cancer
    Amstutz, Florian
    Nenoff, Lena
    Albertini, Francesca
    Ribeiro, Cassia O.
    Knopf, Antje C.
    Unkelbach, Jan
    Weber, Damien C.
    Lomax, Antony J.
    Zhang, Ye
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 66 (10):
  • [7] Extreme hypofractionated proton radiotherapy for prostate cancer using pencil beam scanning: Dosimetry, acute toxicity and preliminary results
    Kubes, Jiri
    Vondracek, Vladimir
    Andrlik, Michal
    Navratil, Matej
    Slavikova, Silvia
    Vitek, Pavel
    Rosina, Jozef
    Abrahamova, Jitka
    Prausova, Jana
    Grebenyuk, Alexander
    Dedeckova, Katerina
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 63 (06) : 829 - 835
  • [8] Robust Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Treatment Planning for Rectal Cancer Radiation Therapy
    Kiely, Janid Patricia Blanco
    White, Benjamin M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 95 (01): : 208 - 215
  • [9] Pencil beam scanning proton therapy vs rotational arc radiation therapy: A treatment planning comparison for postoperative oropharyngeal cancer
    Apinorasethkul, Ontida
    Kirk, Maura
    Teo, Kevin
    Swisher-McClure, Samuel
    Lukens, John N.
    Lin, Alexander
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2017, 42 (01) : 7 - 11
  • [10] Integration and dosimetric validation of a dynamic collimation system for pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Nelson, Nicholas P.
    Culberson, Wesley S.
    Hyer, Daniel E.
    Geoghegan, Theodore J.
    Patwardhan, Kaustubh A.
    Smith, Blake R.
    Flynn, Ryan T.
    Gutierrez, Alonso N.
    Boland, Thibault
    Hill, Patrick M.
    BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2023, 9 (06)