Legal Framework on Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain Technology Application

被引:0
|
作者
Sofinska, Iryna [1 ]
机构
[1] Lviv Polytech Natl Univ, UA-79005 Lvov, Ukraine
来源
DEPENDABLE COMPUTING-EDCC 2024 WORKSHOPS, SAFEAUTONOMY, TRUST IN BLOCKCHAIN | 2024年 / 2078卷
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
trust; AI; blockchain technologies;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-56776-6_10
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Faced with the prompt technological development of AI and blockchain technologies globally, policymakers are empowered to propose (make) laws to protect fundamental human rights following the opportunities and addressing challenges, even threats, presented by AI applications in everyday life. It aims to set future-proof and innovation-friendly standards, draft legal frameworks, develop new global norms, and harmonize landmark rules to ensure AI can be trusted: it is a force for good in society, works for people, and is not considered a clear threat to them. Democracy, the rule of law, safety and security, transparency, and trust following the protection of fundamental human rights are at stake. AI that help to manipulate human behavior to circumvent users' free will and permit some 'social scoring' by governments or pro-government majority in the parliament should be banned while demonstrating potential danger, clear threat, and causing unacceptable risk. Several countriesworldwide (Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, India, Japan, Korea, New Zealand, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, the United Kingdom, and the USA) have adopted a proactive approach toward AI regulation. Those countries aim to implement essential policies and infrastructure measures to cultivate a robust AI sector rather than introduce specific legislation to regulate its growth. Without comprehensive legislation, governments have published some legal frameworks, guidelines, and roadmaps, white papers that depict the future of possible AI regulation in these countries and help responsibly manage their AI usage. Finally, the European Union joined 'the club' following the political agreement reached recently, on December 11, 2023, between the European Parliament and the Council on the Artificial Intelligence Act (the first-ever comprehensive legal framework on AI globally), proposed by the Commission in April 2021.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 107
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Developing a Framework for the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Technology Education: Enhancing Learning and Innovation
    Lim, Mika
    TEHNICKI GLASNIK-TECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 18 (02): : 229 - 233
  • [32] Towards Risk-Free Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: Significance and Requirements
    Alzubaidi, Laith
    Al-Sabaawi, Aiman
    Bai, Jinshuai
    Dukhan, Ammar
    Alkenani, Ahmed H.
    Al-Asadi, Ahmed
    Alwzwazy, Haider A.
    Manoufali, Mohamed
    Fadhel, Mohammed A.
    Albahri, A. S.
    Moreira, Catarina
    Ouyang, Chun
    Zhang, Jinglan
    Santamaria, Jose
    Salhi, Asma
    Hollman, Freek
    Gupta, Ashish
    Duan, Ye
    Rabczuk, Timon
    Abbosh, Amin
    Gu, Yuantong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2023, 2023
  • [33] How trustworthy is artificial intelligence? A model for the conflict between objectivity and subjectivity
    Schlicker, Nadine
    Langer, Markus
    Hirsch, Martin C.
    INNERE MEDIZIN, 2023, : 1051 - 1057
  • [34] User trust in artificial intelligence: A comprehensive conceptual framework
    Yang, Rongbin
    Wibowo, Santoso
    ELECTRONIC MARKETS, 2022, 32 (04) : 2053 - 2077
  • [35] User trust in artificial intelligence: A comprehensive conceptual framework
    Rongbin Yang
    Santoso Wibowo
    Electronic Markets, 2022, 32 : 2053 - 2077
  • [36] Trust and trustworthy artificial intelligence: A research agenda for AI in the environmental sciences
    Bostrom, Ann
    Demuth, Julie L.
    Wirz, Christopher D.
    Cains, Mariana G.
    Schumacher, Andrea
    Madlambayan, Deianna
    Bansal, Akansha Singh
    Bearth, Angela
    Chase, Randy
    Crosman, Katherine M.
    Ebert-Uphoff, Imme
    Gagne, David John
    Guikema, Seth
    Hoffman, Robert
    Johnson, Branden B.
    Kumler-Bonfanti, Christina
    Lee, John D.
    Lowe, Anna
    McGovern, Amy
    Przybylo, Vanessa
    Radford, Jacob T.
    Roth, Emilie
    Sutter, Carly
    Tissot, Philippe
    Roebber, Paul
    Stewart, Jebb Q.
    White, Miranda
    Williams, John K.
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2024, 44 (06) : 1498 - 1513
  • [37] Artificial Intelligence Limitations: Blockchain Trust and Communication Transparency
    Leshchev, Sergey, V
    BIOLOGICALLY INSPIRED COGNITIVE ARCHITECTURES 2021, 2022, 1032 : 249 - 254
  • [38] Technological Convergence of Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence: A Review and Challenges
    Choi, Nakhoon
    Kim, Heeyoul
    ELECTRONICS, 2025, 14 (01):
  • [39] Property ownership and the legal personhood of artificial intelligence
    Brown, Rafael Dean
    INFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY LAW, 2021, 30 (02) : 208 - 234
  • [40] Professionalism in artificial intelligence: The link between technology and ethics
    Klarin, Anton
    Abadi, Hossein Ali
    Sharmelly, Rifat
    SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2024, 41 (04) : 557 - 580