Law, War and Letter Writing

被引:0
|
作者
Chiam, Madelaine [1 ]
Cormier, Monique [2 ]
Hood, Anna [3 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Melbourne, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Melbourne, Australia
[3] Univ Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
SCIENCE COMMUNICATION;
D O I
10.1093/ejil/chae041
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
When (some) international crises arise, it has become common for lawyers to respond by penning open letters that call out violations of international law and call on governments, international organizations or civil society to take a suite of actions. In this article, we argue that the prevalence of international law open letter writing means that open letters can now be viewed as a genre of international legal practice. Consequently, there is a need for international lawyers to attend more closely to the purposes, conventions and consequences of the practice. Drawing on open letters that were written in the first three months of the Russia-Ukraine conflict in 2022 and the first three months of the Israel-Gaza conflict in 2023, we argue that there are three main purposes embedded in these letters: advocacy, solidarity and public education. Throughout this article, we explore these purposes, consider their limits and possibilities and analyse how the letter writers seek to achieve them. We contend that, at present, international law open letters pursue advocacy, solidarity and public education in ways that are often narrow and with possible unintended consequences. We suggest that these limitations could be addressed through employing a broader array of open letter-writing modalities.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 602
页数:26
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] On science writing
    Ferris, T
    PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE, 2002, 4 (01) : 3 - 12
  • [2] Academic writing in museums
    Roche, Joseph
    Barber, Gillian L.
    Batlle, Mireia
    Bell, Laura
    Hulm, Eleanor M.
    Lynch, Evan
    Martin, Ian
    McDwyer, Eimear
    McLoone, Fiona
    Mu, Manting
    Neenan, Emer Emily
    Ryan, Cliodhna
    MUSEUM MANAGEMENT AND CURATORSHIP, 2022, 37 (05) : 555 - 560
  • [3] Development and Validation of a Universal Science Writing Rubric That is Applicable to Diverse Genres of Science Writing
    Pisano, Alycia
    Crawford, Amanda
    Huffman, Heather
    Graham, Barbara
    Kelp, Nicole
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2021, 22 (03)
  • [4] Better Writing, Brick by Brick: a Student-Centered Writing Exercise Using LEGO
    Fitzpatrick, Kathleen
    Barker, Megan K.
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2023, 24 (02)
  • [5] Developing Scientific Writing of Lower Secondary Students through Inquiry and Science Writing Heuristic Learning
    Nuntasane, Jirun
    Tawnonngiew, Bungorn
    Nuangchalerm, Prasart
    JURNAL PENELITIAN DAN PEMBELAJARAN IPA, 2020, 6 (02): : 180 - 193
  • [6] Assessing and improving L2 graduate students' popular science and academic writing in an academic writing course
    Rakedzon, Tzipora
    Baram-Tsabari, Ayelet
    EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 37 (01) : 48 - 66
  • [7] Gender dimensions in popular science writing in India
    Dharmapalan, Biju
    Mahesh, G.
    Kumar, Phuldeep
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2021, 121 (10): : 1302 - 1306
  • [8] Reinventing the Letter to the Editor in Science: A Dedicated Preprint Server
    Daly, Timothy
    Nazarovets, Serhii
    da Silva, Jaime A. Teixeira
    PUBLISHING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2025, 41 (01) : 27 - 39
  • [9] Responsible Use of Language in Scientific Writing and Science Communication
    Kueffer, Christoph
    Larson, Brendon M. H.
    BIOSCIENCE, 2014, 64 (08) : 719 - 724
  • [10] Mythbusting Medical Writing: Goodbye, Ghosts! Hello, Help!
    Hamilton, Cindy W.
    Gertel, Art
    Jacobs, Adam
    Marchington, Jackie
    Weaver, Shelley
    Woolley, Karen
    ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY, 2016, 23 (03): : 178 - 194