Digital Health Literacy and Its Association With Sociodemographic Characteristics, Health Resource Use, and Health Outcomes: Rapid Review

Background: Digital health literacy has emerged as a critical skill set to navigate the digital age.Objective: This review sought to broadly summarize the literature on associations between digital health literacy and (1)sociodemographic characteristics, (2) health resource use, and (3) health outcomes in the general population, patient groups, or parent or caregiver groups. Methods: A rapid review of literature published between January 2016 and May 2022 was conducted through a search of 4web-based databases. Articles were included on the basis of the following keywords: "measured digital health literacy," "digital literacy," "e health literacy," "e-health literacy," "electronic health literacy," or "internet health literacy" in adult populations;participants were from countries where English was the primary language; studies had to be cross-sectional, longitudinal, prospective, or retrospective, and published in English. Results: Thirty-six articles met the inclusion criteria. Evidence on the associations between digital health literacy andsociodemographic characteristics varied (27/36, 75% included studies), with higher education (16/21, 76.2% studies that examined the association) and younger age (12/21, 57.1% studies) tending to predict higher digital health literacy; however, other studies found no associations. No differences between genders were found across the majority of studies. Evidence across ethnic group was too limited to draw conclusions; some studies showed that those from racial and ethnic minority groups had higher digital health literacy than White individuals, while other studies showed no associations. Higher digital health literacy was associated with digital health resource use in the majority of studies (20/36, 55.6%) that examined this relationship. In addition, higher digital health literacy was also associated with health outcomes across 3 areas (psychosocial outcomes; chronic disease and health management behaviors; and physical outcomes) across 17 included studies (17/36, 47.2%) that explored these relationships However, not all studies on the relationship among digital health literacy and health resource use and health outcomes were inthe expected direction. Conclusions: The review presents mixed results regarding the relationship between digital health literacy and sociodemo graphic characteristics, although studies broadly found that increased digital health literacy was positively associated with improved health outcomes and behaviors. Further investigations of digital health literacy on chronic disease outcomes are needed, particularly across diverse groups. Empowering individuals with the skills to critically access and appraise reliable health information on digital platforms and devices is critical, given emerging evidence that suggests that those with low digital health literacy seek health information from unreliable sources. Identifying cost-effective strategies to rapidly assess and enhance digital healthliteracy capacities across community settings thus warrants continued investigation.