Managing the work stress of inpatient nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review of organizational interventions

被引:1
|
作者
Zink, Maria [1 ]
Pischke, Frederike [2 ]
Wendsche, Johannes [1 ]
Melzer, Marlen [1 ]
机构
[1] Fed Inst Occupat Safety & Hlth BAuA, Dresden, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Dresden TUD, Dresden, Germany
来源
BMC NURSING | 2024年 / 23卷 / 01期
关键词
COVID-19; pandemic; Hospital; Inpatient care; Inpatient nurse; Nursing homes; Organizational workplace intervention; Systematic review; Work organization; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1186/s12912-024-02358-1
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
BackgroundDuring the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, inpatient nurses faced various work stressors. Little is known about organizational interventions that can mitigate the negative consequences of pandemic-related stressors.ObjectiveThe aim was to provide a synopsis of the literature concerning the types and outcomes of organizational interventions performed during the COVID-19 pandemic that directly (re)organized the work structures of inpatient nurses to address pandemic-related work stressors or to increase nurses' ability to cope.MethodsWithin this preregistered systematic literature review, we searched four databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, CINAHL) and two preprint databases (MedRxiv, PsyArXiv) for interventional studies of organizational interventions published between 01/2020 and 03/2023 (k = 990 records). We included 12 primary studies after title-abstract and full-text screening. A synthesis of results without meta-analysis was conducted. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials - version 2 (RoB-2) and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool.ResultsAll interventions were implemented in hospitals. The reasons given for implementation included pandemic-related work stressors such as a high workload, understaffing, and a lack of medical resources. To respond to the various work stressors, half of the studies took a multilevel approach combining organizational and person-oriented interventions (k = 6). Most studies (k = 8) took a secondary prevention approach, focusing on the organization of rest breaks (k = 5). With respect to outcomes, the studies examined nurse-related stress and resilience, turnover intention, job satisfaction, and other factors. Risk-of-bias analyses revealed that conclusions about the effectiveness of the interventions are limited due to confounding factors and self-selection.ConclusionsThe identified interventions provide a basis for future research to draw conclusions on the effectiveness of organizational interventions during pandemics. The promotion of adequate work breaks could be useful if the work stressors associated with strain and negative consequences cannot be changed directly. However, the same stressors (e.g., high workload) can hinder nurses from participating in offered interventions. This emphasizes the importance of directly addressing inpatient nurses' work stressors.RegistrationProspero-ID CRD42023364807 (March 2023).
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The popular identity of nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic: An integrative review
    Bernard, Laurence
    Bevillard-Charriere, Quentin
    Taha, Samy
    Holmes, Dave
    RECHERCHE EN SOINS INFIRMIERS, 2021, (145) : 91 - 103
  • [22] Nurses' Preparedness, Readiness, and Anxiety in Managing COVID-19 Pandemic
    Chua, Bee Seok
    Cosmas, Getrude
    Arsat, Norkiah
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 33 (05) : 564 - 570
  • [23] Consumer research during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review
    Herjanto, Halimin
    Amin, Muslim
    Mahfooz, Yasser
    NANKAI BUSINESS REVIEW INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 13 (04) : 587 - 629
  • [24] The work-family interface and the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review
    Vitoria, Beatriz de Araujo
    Ribeiro, Maria Teresa
    Carvalho, Vania Sofia
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [25] Returning to Work after the COVID-19 Pandemic Earthquake: A Systematic Review
    Garzillo, Elpidio Maria
    Cioffi, Arcangelo
    Carta, Angela
    Monaco, Maria Grazia Lourdes
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (08)
  • [26] Abortion services during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review
    Kowsar Qaderi
    Rasa Khodavirdilou
    Mehri Kalhor
    Bahar Morshed Behbahani
    Maryam Keshavarz
    Maryam Hassanzadeh Bashtian
    Mahsa Dabir
    Morvarid Irani
    Elham Manouchehri
    Maryam Farmahini Farahani
    Manthar Ali Mallah
    Ahmadreza Shamsabadi
    Reproductive Health, 20
  • [27] Telehealth utilization during the Covid-19 pandemic: A systematic review
    Garfan, Salem
    Alamoodi, A. H.
    Zaidan, B. B.
    Al-Zobbi, Mohammed
    Hamid, Rula A.
    Alwan, Jwan K.
    Ahmaro, Ibraheem Y. Y.
    Khalid, Eman Thabet
    Jumaah, F. M.
    Albahri, O. S.
    Zaidan, A. A.
    Albahri, A. S.
    Al-qaysi, Z. T.
    Ahmed, M. A.
    Shuwandy, Moceheb Lazam
    Salih, Mahmood M.
    Zughoul, Omar
    Mohammed, K., I
    Momani, Fayiz
    COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2021, 138
  • [28] Return to Work: Managing Employee Population Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Fragala, Maren S.
    Goldberg, Zachary N.
    Goldberg, Steven E.
    POPULATION HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2021, 24 : S3 - S15
  • [29] GP wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review
    Jefferson, Laura
    Golder, Su
    Heathcote, Claire
    Avila, Ana Castro
    Dale, Veronica
    Essex, Holly
    Cornelis, Christina van der Feltz
    McHugh, Elizabeth
    Moe-Byrne, Thirimon
    Bloor, Karen
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2022, 72 (718) : E325 - E333
  • [30] Urology during COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis: A Systematic Review
    Thapa, Bikash Bikram
    Shrestha, Dhan
    Bista, Sanjeeb
    Thapa, Suresh
    Niranjan, Vikram
    SURGERY JOURNAL, 2021, 07 (01) : e3 - e10