Comparison of postoperative chronic inguinal pain between the lichtenstein and laparoscopic techniques in the treatment of inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Lyra, Valentina Guidi [1 ]
dos Santos, Sofia Brandao [1 ]
Rocha, Carolina Bevilacqua Trigo [1 ]
Guimaraes, Fernando Augusto Garcia [1 ]
Riva, Wagner Jose [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Univ Lusiada, Fac Ciencias Med Santos, Dept Gen Surg, St Oswaldo Cruz 179 Boqueirao, Santos, SP, Brazil
关键词
Inguinal hernia; Chronic postoperative pain; Postoperative inguinodynia; TAPP (transabdominal preperitoneal repair); TEP (total extraperitoneal repair); Lichtenstein technique; REPAIR; OUTCOMES; EXTRAPERITONEAL; LIFE;
D O I
10.1007/s10029-024-03099-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeCurrently, inguinal hernias are highly prevalent in the Brazilian population, accounting for 75% of all abdominal wall hernias. The recommended treatment to correct them is inguinal herniorrhaphy, which can be performed through open surgery, mainly using the Lichtenstein technique, or laparoscopically, primarily through Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair (TAPP) or Total Extraperitoneal Repair (TEP) approaches. Like any surgery, these procedures have post-operative complications, with pain being the most common and debilitating. Currently, in European and Brazilian guidelines, the open Lichtenstein and endoscopic inguinal hernia techniques are recommended as best evidence-based options for repair of a primary unilateral hernia providing the surgeon is sufficiently experienced in the specific procedure. In that matter, the surgeon should make a choice based on assessment of the benefits and risks of performing each of them, and practice shared making decision with it patient. Therefore, the objective of this review was to assess the incidence of chronic postoperative pain by comparing the aforementioned surgical approaches to evaluate which procedure causes less disability to the patient.MethodsThe search conducted until May 2024 was performed on Medline (PubMed), Cochrane (CENTRAL), and Lilacs databases. The selection was limited to randomized clinical trials, nonrandomized clinical trials and cohort studies comparing TAPP or TEP to LC, evaluating the incidence of chronic postoperative pain published between 2017 and 2023. Evidence certainty was assessed using the GRADE Pro tool, and bias risk was evaluated with the RoB 2.0 tool and ROBINS I tool. Thirteen studies were included. ResultsThe meta-analysis showed a significant difference between the groups in both techniques, favoring the laparoscopic approach, which had a lower occurrence of postoperative inguinodynia with a relative risk of 0.49 (95% CI = 0.32, 0.75; I2 = 66% (P = 0.001); Z = 3.28 (P = 0.001) with low certainty of evidence.ConclusionThe presence of chronic postoperative pain was lower in laparoscopic TEP/TAPP techniques when compared to the open Lichtenstein technique, meaning that the former can bring more benefits to patients who requires inguinal herniorrhaphy. Nevertheless, further randomized clinical trials are needed to optimize the analysis, minimizing the bias.
引用
收藏
页码:1537 / 1546
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Desarda versus Lichtenstein technique for the treatment of primary inguinal hernia: A systematic review
    Ge, Hua
    Liang, Chaojie
    Xu, Yingchen
    Ren, Shulin
    Wu, Jixiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 50 : 22 - 27
  • [32] Absorbable Meshes in Inguinal Hernia Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Oberg, Stina
    Andresen, Kristoffer
    Rosenberg, Jacob
    SURGICAL INNOVATION, 2017, 24 (03) : 289 - 298
  • [33] Shouldice versus Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Pompeu, Bernardo Fontel
    Pasqualotto, Eric
    Marcolin, Patricia
    Delgado, Lucas Monteiro
    Pigossi, Beatriz D'Andrea
    Leme, Luis Fernando Paes
    Melland-Smith, Megan
    de Figueiredo, Sergio Mazzola Poli
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 48 (11) : 2604 - 2614
  • [34] Treatment of chronic inguinal pain after repair of inguinal hernia
    Amador Barrameda, Ventura
    Vazquez Melero, Alba
    REVISTA HISPANOAMERICANA DE HERNIA, 2020, 8 (02) : 77 - 88
  • [35] Desarda’s technique versus Lichtenstein technique for the treatment of primary inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    S. H. Emile
    H. Elfeki
    Hernia, 2018, 22 : 385 - 395
  • [36] Systematic review and meta-analysis on heavy and lightweight polypropylene mesh in Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty
    M. Śmietański
    I. A. Śmietańska
    A. Modrzejewski
    M. P. Simons
    T. J. Aufenacker
    Hernia, 2012, 16 : 519 - 528
  • [37] Optimal timing for inguinal hernia repair in premature infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Masoudian, Pourya
    Sullivan, Katrina J.
    Mohamed, Hisham
    Nasr, Ahmed
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2019, 54 (08) : 1539 - 1545
  • [38] Robotic inguinal hernia repair: is technology taking over? Systematic review and meta-analysis
    A. Aiolfi
    M. Cavalli
    G. Micheletto
    P. G. Bruni
    F. Lombardo
    C. Perali
    G. Bonitta
    D. Bona
    Hernia, 2019, 23 : 509 - 519
  • [39] Systematic review and meta-analysis on heavy and lightweight polypropylene mesh in Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty
    Smietanski, M.
    Smietanska, I. A.
    Modrzejewski, A.
    Simons, M. P.
    Aufenacker, T. J.
    HERNIA, 2012, 16 (05) : 519 - 528
  • [40] Comparison of Hernia Sac Transection and Full Sac Reduction for the Treatment of Inguinal Hernias: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
    Cirocchi, Roberto
    Popivanov, Georgi I.
    Cianci, Maria Chiara
    Morabito, Antonino
    Matteucci, Matteo
    Lauricella, Sara
    Cassini, Diletta
    Boselli, Carlo
    Szergyuk, Ivan
    Tebala, Giovanni Domenico
    Rizzuto, Antonia
    Bruzzone, Paolo
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2025,