From data to harvest: Leveraging ensemble machine learning for enhanced crop yield predictions across Canada amidst climate change

被引:7
作者
Gharakhanlou, Navid Mahdizadeh [1 ]
Perez, Liliana [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Lab Geosimulat Environm LEDGE, Dept Geog, 1375 Ave Therese Lavoie Roux, Montreal, PQ H2V 0B3, Canada
关键词
Climate change scenarios; Bagging and boosting approaches; Honeybee impact; Canada's agricultural landscape; Pollinator-dependent crops; Geographical information systems (GIS); PRECISION AGRICULTURE; NEURAL-NETWORKS; MODEL; CORN; CLASSIFICATION; REDUCTION; IMPACT; SOIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175764
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Accurate crop yield predictions are crucial for farmers and policymakers. Despite the widespread use of ensemble machine learning (ML) models in computer science, their application in crop yield prediction remains relatively underexplored. This study, conducted in Canada, aims to assess the potential of five distinct ensemble ML models-Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), XGBoost, LightGBM, and Random Forest (RF)-in predicting crop yields chosen for their ability to manage complex datasets and their strong performance potential. The study integrated various factors, including climate variables, satellite-derived vegetation indices, soil characteristics, and honeybee census data. Data preparation comprised two main steps: first, climate variables were interpolated and averaged for croplands in ArcGIS Pro, along with averaging vegetation indices and soil characteristics. Honeybee census data was also incorporated. Second, the data was organized in Python to create a structured format for models' input. The models' accuracy was assessed using Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), R-squared, and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). XGBoost emerged as the most accurate model, with the lowest MAE (68.70 for canola and 39.47 for soybeans), lowest RMSE (119.48 for canola and 102.39 for soybeans), and highest R-squared values (0.95 for canola and 0.96 for soybeans) on the test dataset. The study also assessed crop yields under various climate change scenarios, finding minimal variations across the scenarios, but significant negative impacts on canola and soybean yields across Canada. Honeybee colonies were identified as the most influential factor on crop yields, contributing 52.34 % to canola and 57.18 % to soybean yields. This research provides detailed crop yield maps of canola and soybeans at the Census Consolidated Subdivisions (CCS) level across Canada's agricultural landscape, offering valuable forecasts for localized decision-making. Additionally, it offers a proactive strategy for climate change preparedness, assisting farmers and stakeholders optimise resource allocation and manage risks effectively.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 99 条
  • [1] InfoCrop: A dynamic simulation model for the assessment of crop yields, losses due to pests, and environmental impact of agro-ecosystems in tropical environments. I. Model description
    Aggarwal, PK
    Kalra, N
    Chander, S
    Pathak, H
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2006, 89 (01) : 1 - 25
  • [2] Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), 2024, Soil Landscapes of Canada Version 3.2
  • [3] Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), 2024, Canadian Crop Yields - Historic Yields of Major Crops (Pre-packaged CSV files)
  • [4] Yield Forecasting of Spring Maize Using Remote Sensing and Crop Modeling in Faisalabad-Punjab Pakistan
    Ahmad, Ishfaq
    Saeed, Umer
    Fahad, Muhammad
    Ullah, Asmat
    Rahman, M. Habib Ur
    Ahmad, Ashfaq
    Judge, Jasmeet
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN SOCIETY OF REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 46 (10) : 1701 - 1711
  • [5] Alsabti K., 1998, Proceedings Fourth International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, P2
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2014, Native pollinators and agriculture in Canada
  • [7] Optimizing machine learning for agricultural productivity: A novel approach with RScv and remote sensing data over Europe
    Asadollah, Seyed Babak Haji Seyed
    Jodar-Abellan, Antonio
    Pardo, Miguel Angel
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2024, 218
  • [8] Baral S, 2011, COMM COM INF SC, V142, P315
  • [9] Seasonal crop yield forecast: Methods, applications, and accuracies
    Basso, Bruno
    Liu, Lin
    [J]. ADVANCES IN AGRONOMY, VOL 154, 2019, 154 : 201 - 255
  • [10] Bejo S.K., 2014, Journal of food science and engineering, V4, P1, DOI DOI 10.17265/2159-5828/2014.01.001