Mechanized wet direct seeding for increased rice production efficiency and reduced carbon footprint

被引:1
作者
Hung, Nguyen Van [1 ]
Thach, Tran Ngoc [2 ]
Hoang, Nguyen Ngoc [2 ]
Binh, Nguyen Cao Quan [2 ]
Tam, Dang Minh [2 ]
Hau, Tran Tan [2 ]
Anh, Duong Thi Tu [2 ]
Khuong, Trinh Quang [2 ]
Chi, Vo Thi Bich [2 ]
Lien, Truong Thi Kieu [2 ]
Gummert, Martin [1 ]
Rakotoson, Tovohery [1 ]
Saito, Kazuki [1 ]
Kumar, Virender [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Rice Res Inst, Los Banos 4031, Philippines
[2] Cuu Long Rice Res Inst, Can Tho City, Vietnam
基金
比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会;
关键词
Crop establishment; Sustainable production; Low carbon; Climate change; Agrifood; Resilience; DIRECT-SEEDED RICE; CROP ESTABLISHMENT; MANAGEMENT; FERTILIZER; YIELD; DELTA;
D O I
10.1007/s11119-024-10163-8
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Crop establishment is one of the major rice production operations that strongly affects rice production, productivity, and environmental impacts. This research introduced a new technology and provided scientific evidence for the benefits of mechanized wet direct seeding (mDSR) of rice as compared with the other crop establishment practices commonly applied by farmers for wet direct seeded rice in Mekong River Delta in Vietnam, such as seeding in line using drum-seeder (dDSR) and broadcast seeding (bDSR). The experiment was implemented across two consecutive rice cropping seasons that are Winter-Spring season and Summer-Autumn season in 2020-2021. Treatments included (1-3) mDSR with seeding rates of 30, 50, and 70 kg ha- 1, (4) dDSR with 80 kg ha- 1 seed rate, and (5) bDSR as current farmer practice with seeding rate of 180 kg ha- 1. The fertilizer application was adjusted as per seeding rate with 80:40:30 kg ha- 1 N: P2O5: K2O with lower seed rate 30 and 50 kg ha- 1 in mDSR; 90:40:30 kg ha- 1 N: P2O5: K2O with medium seed rate of 70 to 80 kg ha- 1; and 115:55:40 kg ha- 1 N: P2O5: K2O with high seed rate of 180 kg ha- 1 in bDSR. Mechanized wet direct seeding rice with a lower seed rate of 30 to 70 kg ha- 1 and fertilizer rate by 22-30% reduced variation in seedling density by 40-80% and in yield by 0.1 to 0.3 t ha- 1 and had similar yield to bDSR. In consequence, N productivity was 27 and 32% higher in mDSR as compared to bDSR during the Winter-Spring season and Summer-Autumn seasons, respectively. The use of lower seed rate and fertilizer in mDSR also led to higher income and lower carbon footprint (GHGe per kg of paddy grains) of rice production than the currently used practices of bDSR. Net income of mDSR was comparable to that of dDSR and higher by 145-220 and 171-248 $US than that of bDSR in Winter-Spring season and Summer-Autumn, respectively. The carbon footprint of mDSR rice production compared to bDSR was lower by 22-25% and 12-20% during the Winter-Spring and Summer-Autumn seasons, respectively. Given the above benefits of farming efficiency, higher income, and low emission, mDSR would be a technology package that strongly supports sustainable rice cultivation transformation for the Mekong River Delta of Vietnam. Mechanized direct seeding decreased the seed rate by 61-83% compared to broadcast seeding.Mechanized direct seeding increased nitrogen productivity by 27-32% compared to broadcast seeding.Mechanized direct seeding decreased rice carbon footprint by 19-24% compared to broadcast seeding.
引用
收藏
页码:2226 / 2244
页数:19
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Growth, yield and nitrogen use efficiency of dry-seeded rice as influenced by nitrogen and seed rates in Bangladesh
    Ahmed, Sharif
    Humphreys, Elizabeth
    Salim, Muhammad
    Chauhan, Bhagirath S.
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2016, 186 : 18 - 31
  • [2] American Society of Agricultural Engineers (ASAE), 1982, MOIST MEAS GRAIN SEE, P3521
  • [3] Calvo Buendia E., 2019, 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories
  • [4] Canopy development of direct-seeded rice and some important grass and sedge weeds in response to water management
    Caton, BP
    Hill, JE
    Mortimer, AM
    Foin, TC
    Lubigan, RT
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2002, 111 (01) : 39 - 53
  • [5] A global analysis of alternative tillage and crop establishment practices for economically and environmentally efficient rice production
    Chakraborty, Debashis
    Ladha, Jagdish Kumar
    Rana, Dharamvir Singh
    Jat, Mangi Lal
    Gathala, Mahesh Kumar
    Yadav, Sudhir
    Rao, Adusumilli Narayana
    Ramesha, Mugadoli S.
    Raman, Anitha
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [6] Agronomic and Environmental Determinants of Direct Seeded Rice in South Asia
    Chaudhary A.
    Venkatramanan V.
    Kumar Mishra A.
    Sharma S.
    [J]. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 2023, 3 (1): : 253 - 290
  • [7] Effect of crop establishment methods and weed control treatments on weed management, and rice yield
    Chauhan, Bhagirath Singh
    Awan, Tahir Hussain
    Abugho, Seth Bernard
    Evengelista, Gio
    Sudhir-Yadav
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2015, 172 : 72 - 84
  • [8] Weed management practices of smallholder rice farmers in Northwest Cambodia
    Chhun, Sokunroth
    Kumar, Virender
    Martin, Robert J.
    Srean, Pao
    Hadi, Buyung A. R.
    [J]. CROP PROTECTION, 2020, 135
  • [9] Assessing alternative crop establishment methods with a sustainability lens in rice production systems of Eastern India
    Devkota, Krishna Prasad
    Sudhir-Yadav
    Khanda, C. M.
    Beebout, Sarah J.
    Mohapatra, Bidhan K.
    Singleton, Grant R.
    Puskur, Ranjitha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 244
  • [10] Rice direct seeding: Experiences, challenges and opportunities
    Farooq, M.
    Siddique, Kadambot H. M.
    Rehman, H.
    Aziz, T.
    Lee, Dong-Jin
    Wahid, A.
    [J]. SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2011, 111 (02) : 87 - 98