Feasibility and acceptability of implementing an evidence-based ESCALATION system for paediatric clinical deterioration

被引:1
作者
Gill, Fenella J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cooper, Alannah [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Falconer, Pania [2 ]
Stokes, Scott [6 ,7 ]
Roberts, Alison [1 ,8 ,9 ]
Szabo, Matthew [3 ]
Leslie, Gavin D. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] Perth Childrens Hosp, Child & Adolescent Hlth Serv, Nursing Res, Nedlands, WA, Australia
[3] South Metropolitan Hlth Serv, Nursing & Midwifery Res Unit, Murdoch, WA, Australia
[4] St John God Healthcare, Nursing Res, Subiaco, WA, Australia
[5] Royal Perth Hosp, Clin Nursing Res Unit, Perth, WA, Australia
[6] Broome Hosp, Kimberley Reg Paediat Serv, Western Australia Country Hlth Serv, Kimberley, WA, Australia
[7] Univ Notre Dame Australia, Natl Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Broome, WA, Australia
[8] Child & Adolescent Hlth Serv, Dept Endocrinol & Diabet, Nedlands, WA, Australia
[9] Telethon Kids Inst, Childrens Diabet Ctr, Nedlands, WA, Australia
关键词
INTERVENTIONS;
D O I
10.1038/s41390-024-03459-y
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe ESCALATION system is a novel paediatric Early Warning System that incorporates family involvement and sepsis recognition. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and iteratively refine the ESCALATION system in a variety of hospital settings in preparation for full-service implementation.MethodsA series of four multi-methods studies using an Implementation Science and co-design approach were conducted. We examined concepts of implementation, context, and mechanisms of action across a variety of hospitals. Data collected included practice and chart audits, surveys (health professionals), interviews (families) and focus groups (health professionals). Quantitative data were analysed descriptively with qualitative findings assessed by content analysis or thematic analysis.ResultsThere were 650 audits (Study I-IV), 205 health professional survey responses (Study I), 154 health professionals participated in focus groups (Study II-IV), 13 parents of hospitalised children interviewed (Study I), and 107 parents reported their involvement in the ESCALATION system (Study III-IV). Each of the studies further refined and confirmed the feasibility, specifically the components of family involvement and the sepsis recognition pathway.ConclusionThe Implementation Science evaluation of the ESCALATION system resulted in a uniform approach that was feasible and acceptable to users and appropriate for full-service implementation.ImpactThis series of four studies used a co-production approach built on the Medical Research Council framework to understand feasibility and acceptability of an intervention to improve recognition and response to clinical deterioration in children to the point of full-service implementation.We have reported a detailed, systematic approach to assessing feasibility and acceptability of a complex intervention using established methodologies for whole of health system implementation.The ESCALATION System is an evidence based paediatric early warning system that is a highly refined, well accepted and accommodates a health system that has substantial contextual variation.
引用
收藏
页码:1047 / 1057
页数:11
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, 2022, SEPSIS CLIN CARE STA
[2]  
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, Audit Tools and Quality Measures for Recognition and Response Systems
[3]  
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, 2017, Consumer Health Information Needs and Preferences: Perspectives of Culturally and Linguistically Diverse and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People
[4]  
Australian Sepsis Network, 2017, Stopping Sepsis a National Action Plan
[5]   Measuring blood pressure in children [J].
Bird, Chris ;
Michie, Colin .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 336 (7657) :1321-1321
[6]   Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health [J].
Campbell, M ;
Fitzpatrick, R ;
Haines, A ;
Kinmonth, AL ;
Sandercock, P ;
Spiegelhalter, D ;
Tyrer, P .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7262) :694-696
[7]   Missed opportunities: incomplete and inaccurate recording of paediatric early warning scores [J].
Chapman, Susan M. ;
Oulton, Kate ;
Peters, Mark John ;
Wray, Jo .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2019, 104 (12) :1208-1213
[8]   The safety of health care for ethnic minority patients: a systematic review [J].
Chauhan, Ashfaq ;
Walton, Merrilyn ;
Manias, Elizabeth ;
Walpola, Ramesh Lahiru ;
Seale, Holly ;
Latanik, Monika ;
Leone, Desiree ;
Mears, Stephen ;
Harrison, Reema .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2020, 19 (01)
[9]   In search of the 'best' rapid response early warning system - The journey has just begun [J].
Chen, Jack .
RESUSCITATION, 2018, 123 :A1-A2
[10]   Where the rubber meets the road: using FRAM to align work-as-imagined with work-as-done when implementing clinical guidelines [J].
Clay-Williams, Robyn ;
Hounsgaard, Jeanette ;
Hollnagel, Erik .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2015, 10