Technology-infused teams-games-tournaments in English lan guage class: a mixed method study on students' achievement and perception

被引:1
作者
Anggoro, Kiki Juli [1 ,2 ]
Khasanah, Uswatun [3 ]
机构
[1] Walailak Univ, Sch Educ & Liberal Arts, Thai Buri, Thailand
[2] Walailak Univ, Ctr Excellence Women & Social Secur, Thai Buri, Thailand
[3] Victoria Univ Wellington, Sch Linguist & Appl Language Studies, Wellington, New Zealand
关键词
achievement; perception; English language learning; teams-games-tournaments;
D O I
10.25304/rlt.v32.3150
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Technology in language instruction has become a new norm due to its effectiveness, and one example is the Teams-Games-Tournaments (TGT) method. The purpose of this study is to measure students' achievement in English language classes by using technology-infused TGT and ask the students to evaluate their learning experience with this method. This research involved 30 students as the control group and 30 students as the experimental group from two sections of the same general English course at a Thailand university. Pre- and post-tests of the control and the experimental group were conducted to assess the success of the method. At the end of the term, a questionnaire consisting of closed and open-ended questions was used to record the students' perceptions. The findings showed that the experimental group's scores were higher suggesting the success of the method in improving students' achievement. The experimental group's perceptions as expressed in the questionnaire under cooperation, motivation, achievement, and satisfaction were highly positive as students gave, on average, ratings of more than 4.0 to all categories. The implication of these findings was the effective application of this method in English classes.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Alseweed M.A., 2013, STUDIELIT LANGUAGE, V6, P65, DOI [10.3968/j.sll.1923156320130601.1464, DOI 10.3968/J.SLL.1923156320130601, DOI 10.3968/j.sll. 1923156320130601.1464, 10.3968/j.sll.1923156320130601, DOI 10.3968/J.SLL.1923156320130601.1464]
[2]  
Ambarwati T, 2016, ENGL EDUC-UK, V4, P310, DOI 10.20961/edj.v4i3.40082
[3]  
Anggoro KJ, 2021, Studies in English Language and Education, V8, P1177, DOI [10.24815/siele.v8i3.19629, 10.24815/siele.v8i3.19629, DOI 10.24815/SIELE.V8I3.19629]
[4]   University students? perceptions of interactive response system in an English language course: a case of Pear Deck [J].
Anggoro, Kiki Juli ;
Pratiwi, Damar Isti .
RESEARCH IN LEARNING TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 31
[5]  
Arakkitsakul Y., 2019, Journal of Southern Technology, V12, P257
[6]  
Aykut A., 2008, International Journal of Human Sciences, V5, P1
[7]  
Budiyono B, 2020, Edulingua Jurnal Linguistiks Terapan dan Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, V7, P13, DOI [10.34001/edulingua.v7i2.1401, 10.34001/edulingua.v7i2.1401, DOI 10.34001/EDULINGUA.V7I2.1401]
[8]  
Yunus CCA, 2021, Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, V8, P103, DOI [10.20448/journal.509.2021.81.103.108, 10.20448/journal.509.2021.81.103.108, DOI 10.20448/JOURNAL.509.2021.81.103.108]
[9]  
de Castro M. R. W., 2011, Doctoral Dissertation
[10]  
Garcia V., 2014, Jornadas Internacionales de Innovacion Universitaria, V11, P22