Conserving Evolutionary Potential: Combining Landscape Genomics with Established Methods to Inform Plant Conservation

被引:3
作者
Aitken, Sally N. [1 ]
Jordan, Rebecca [2 ]
Tumas, Hayley R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Forest & Conservat Sci, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] CSIRO Environm, Sandy Bay, Australia
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
climate change; demography; conservation strategies; genomic offset; genotype-environment association; local adaptation; EFFECTIVE POPULATION-SIZE; GENE FLOW; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CONCEPTUAL ISSUES; TREE POPULATIONS; LOCAL ADAPTATION; RESCUE; MANAGEMENT; MIGRATION; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-arplant-070523-044239
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Biodiversity conservation requires conserving evolutionary potential-the capacity for wild populations to adapt. Understanding genetic diversity and evolutionary dynamics is critical for informing conservation decisions that enhance adaptability and persistence under environmental change. We review how emerging landscape genomic methods provide plant conservation programs with insights into evolutionary dynamics, including local adaptation and its environmental drivers. Landscape genomic approaches that explore relationships between genomic variation and environments complement rather than replace established population genomic and common garden approaches for assessing adaptive phenotypic variation, population structure, gene flow, and demography. Collectively, these approaches inform conservation actions, including genetic rescue, maladaptation prediction, and assisted gene flow. The greatest on-the-ground impacts from such studies will be realized when conservation practitioners are actively engaged in research and monitoring. Understanding the evolutionary dynamics shaping the genetic diversity of wild plant populations will inform plant conservation decisions that enhance the adaptability and persistence of species in an uncertain future.
引用
收藏
页码:707 / 736
页数:30
相关论文
共 197 条
  • [1] Restoration of plant species and genetic diversity depends on landscape-scale dispersal
    Aavik, Tsipe
    Helm, Aveliina
    [J]. RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2018, 26 : S92 - S102
  • [2] The evolutionary genomics of species' responses to climate change
    Aguirre-Liguori, Jonas A.
    Ramirez-Barahona, Santiago
    Gaut, Brandon S.
    [J]. NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2021, 5 (10) : 1350 - 1360
  • [3] Regarding the F-word: The effects of data filtering on inferred genotype-environment associations
    Ahrens, Collin W.
    Jordan, Rebecca
    Bragg, Jason
    Harrison, Peter A.
    Hopley, Tara
    Bothwell, Helen
    Murray, Kevin
    Steane, Dorothy A.
    Whale, John W.
    Byrne, Margaret
    Andrew, Rose
    Rymer, Paul D.
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2021, 21 (05) : 1460 - 1474
  • [4] Adaptation, migration or extirpation: climate change outcomes for tree populations
    Aitken, Sally N.
    Yeaman, Sam
    Holliday, Jason A.
    Wang, Tongli
    Curtis-McLane, Sierra
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS, 2008, 1 (01): : 95 - 111
  • [5] Time to get moving: assisted gene flow of forest trees
    Aitken, Sally N.
    Bemmels, Jordan B.
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS, 2016, 9 (01): : 271 - 290
  • [6] Assisted Gene Flow to Facilitate Local Adaptation to Climate Change
    Aitken, Sally N.
    Whitlock, Michael C.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION, AND SYSTEMATICS, VOL 44, 2013, 44 : 367 - +
  • [7] Allendorf F.W., 2022, Conservation and the genomics of populations, DOI DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780198856566.001.0001
  • [8] Plant adaptation to climate change-Where are we?
    Anderson, Jill T.
    Song, Bao-Hua
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION, 2020, 58 (05) : 533 - 545
  • [9] Antonelli A, 2020, State of theWorld's Plants and Fungi 2020
  • [10] Embedding genetics experiments in restoration to guide plant choice for a degraded landscape with a changing climate
    Bailey, Tanya G.
    Harrison, Peter A.
    Davidson, Neil J.
    Weller-Wong, Akira
    Tilyard, Paul
    Steane, Dorothy A.
    Vaillancourt, Rene E.
    Potts, Brad M.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT & RESTORATION, 2021, 22 : 92 - 105