Efficacy and Safety of Dulaglutide 3.0 mg and 4.5 mg Versus Dulaglutide 1.5 mg in Metformin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in a Randomized Controlled Trial (AWARD-11)

被引:118
作者
Frias, Juan P. [1 ]
Bonora, Enzo [2 ]
Nevarez Ruiz, Luis [3 ]
Li, Ying G. [4 ]
Yu, Zhuoxin [4 ]
Milicevic, Zvonko [4 ]
Malik, Raleigh [4 ]
Bethel, M. Angelyn [4 ]
Cox, David A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Inst, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Univ Verona, Div Endocrinol Diabet & Metab, Dept Med, Verona, Italy
[3] Hosp Angeles Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico
[4] Eli Lilly & Co, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
关键词
ONCE-WEEKLY DULAGLUTIDE; CLINICAL-TRIAL; OPEN-LABEL; SEMAGLUTIDE;
D O I
10.2337/dc20-1473
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To compare efficacy and safety of dulaglutide at doses of 3.0 and 4.5 mg versus 1.5 mg in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Patients were randomly assigned to once-weekly dulaglutide 1.5 mg, 3.0 mg, or 4.5 mg for 52 weeks. The primary objective was determining superiority of dulaglutide 3.0 mg and/or 4.5 mg over 1.5 mg in HbA(1c) reduction at 36 weeks. Secondary superiority objectives included change in body weight. Two estimands addressed efficacy objectives: treatment regimen (regardless of treatment discontinuation or rescue medication) and efficacy (on treatment without rescue medication) in all randomly assigned patients. RESULTS Mean baseline HbA(1c) and BMI in randomly assigned patients (N = 1,842) was 8.6% (70 mmol/mol) and 34.2 kg/m(2), respectively. At 36 weeks, dulaglutide 4.5 mg provided superior HbA(1c) reductions compared with 1.5 mg (treatment-regimen estimand: -1.77 vs. -1.54% [-19.4 vs. -16.8 mmol/mol], estimated treatment difference [ETD] -0.24% (-2.6 mmol/mol), P < 0.001; efficacy estimand: -1.87 vs. -1.53% [-20.4 vs. -16.7 mmol/mol], ETD -0.34% (-3.7 mmol/mol), P < 0.001). Dulaglutide 3.0 mg was superior to 1.5 mg for reducing HbA(1c), using the efficacy estimand (ETD -0.17% [-1.9 mmol/mol]; P = 0.003) but not the treatment-regimen estimand (ETD -0.10% [-1.1 mmol/mol]; P = 0.096). Dulaglutide 4.5 mg was superior to 1.5 mg for weight loss at 36 weeks for both estimands (treatment regimen: -4.6 vs. -3.0 kg, ETD -1.6 kg, P < 0.001; efficacy: -4.7 vs. -3.1 kg, ETD -1.6 kg, P < 0.001). Common adverse events through 36 weeks included nausea (1.5 mg, 13.4%; 3 mg, 15.6%; 4.5 mg, 16.4%) and vomiting (1.5 mg, 5.6%; 3 mg, 8.3%; 4.5 mg, 9.3%). CONCLUSIONS In patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by metformin, escalation from dulaglutide 1.5 mg to 3.0 mg or 4.5 mg provided clinically relevant, dose-related reductions in HbA(1c) and body weight with a similar safety profile.
引用
收藏
页码:765 / 773
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
[2]   Glucose Concentrations of Less Than 3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) Should Be Reported in Clinical Trials: A Joint Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes [J].
Amiel, Stephanie A. ;
Aschner, Pablo ;
Childs, Belinda ;
Cryer, Philip E. ;
de Galan, Bastiaan E. ;
Heller, Simon R. ;
Gonder-Frederick, Linda ;
Frier, Brian M. ;
Jones, Timothy ;
Khunti, Kamlesh ;
Leiter, Lawrence A. ;
McCrimmon, Rory J. ;
Luo, Yingying ;
Seaquist, Elizabeth R. ;
Vigersky, Robert ;
Zoungas, Sophia .
DIABETES CARE, 2017, 40 (01) :155-157
[3]   Incorporating and interpreting regulatory guidance on estimands in diabetes clinical trials: The PIONEER 1 randomized clinical trial as an example [J].
Aroda, Vanita R. ;
Saugstrup, Trine ;
Buse, John B. ;
Donsmark, Morten ;
Zacho, Jeppe ;
Davies, Melanie J. .
DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2019, 21 (10) :2203-2210
[4]   Treatment Intensification in Type 2 Diabetes: A Real-World Study of 2-OAD Regimens, GLP-1 RAs, or Basal Insulin [J].
Blonde, Lawrence ;
Raccah, Denis ;
Lew, Elisheva ;
Meyers, Juliana ;
Nikonova, Elena ;
Ajmera, Mayank ;
Davis, Keith L. ;
Bertolini, Monica ;
Guerci, Bruno .
DIABETES THERAPY, 2018, 9 (03) :1169-1184
[5]   Graphical approaches for multiple comparison procedures using weighted Bonferroni, Simes, or parametric tests [J].
Bretz, Frank ;
Posch, Martin ;
Glimm, Ekkehard ;
Klinglmueller, Florian ;
Maurer, Willi ;
Rohmeyer, Kornelius .
BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 53 (06) :894-913
[6]   Pancreatic Safety of Incretin-Based Drugs - FDA and EMA Assessment [J].
Egan, Amy G. ;
Blind, Eberhard ;
Dunder, Kristina ;
de Graeff, Pieter A. ;
Hummer, B. Timothy ;
Bourcier, Todd ;
Rosebraugh, Curtis .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 370 (09) :794-797
[7]   Efficacy and safety of an expanded dulaglutide dose range: A phase 2, placebo-controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes using metformin [J].
Frias, Juan P. ;
Wynne, Alan G. ;
Matyjaszek-Matuszek, Beata ;
Bartaskova, Dagmar ;
Cox, David A. ;
Woodward, Brad ;
Li, Ying G. ;
Tham, Lai S. ;
Milicevic, Zvonko .
DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2019, 21 (09) :2048-2057
[8]   Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Dulaglutide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Analyses of Data from Clinical Trials [J].
Geiser, Jeanne S. ;
Heathman, Michael A. ;
Cui, Xuewei ;
Martin, Jennifer ;
Loghin, Corina ;
Chien, Jenny Y. ;
de la Pea, Amparo .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2016, 55 (05) :625-634
[9]   Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a comprehensive review of the dulaglutide clinical data focusing on the AWARD phase 3 clinical trial program [J].
Jendle, Johan ;
Grunberger, George ;
Blevins, Thomas ;
Giorgino, Francesco ;
Hietpas, Ryan T. ;
Botros, Fady T. .
DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2016, 32 (08) :776-790
[10]   Cardiovascular, mortality, and kidney outcomes with GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials [J].
Kristensen, Soren L. ;
Rorth, Rasmus ;
Jhund, Pardeep S. ;
Docherty, Kieran F. ;
Sattar, Naveed ;
Preiss, David ;
Kober, Lars ;
Petrie, Mark C. ;
McMurray, John J. V. .
LANCET DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2019, 7 (10) :776-785