Aboriginal families living with MJD in remote Australia: questions of access and equity

被引:0
|
作者
Massey, Libby [1 ,2 ]
Gilroy, John [4 ]
Kowal, Emma [5 ]
Doolan, Denise [3 ]
Clough, Alan [3 ]
机构
[1] James Cook Univ, Div Trop Hlth & Med, Cairns, Qld, Australia
[2] MJD Fdn, Alyangula, NT, Australia
[3] James Cook Univ, Australian Inst Trop Hlth & Med, Cairns, Qld, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Charles Perkins Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Deakin Univ, Alfred Deakin Inst, Melbourne, Australia
关键词
Equity; Medically assisted reproduction; Access; Barriers; Remote Australia; Machado-Joseph disease; MACHADO-JOSEPH-DISEASE; INDIGENOUS PEOPLE; CHALLENGES; ORIGIN; RISK; GENE;
D O I
10.1186/s12939-024-02228-x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Managing genetic disease using medically assisted reproductive technology is increasingly promoted as a feasible option, given revolutionary advances in genomics. Far less attention has been directed to the issue of whether there is equitable access to this option. Context and circumstance determine equitable access; however, reporting has drawn overwhelmingly from affluent Anglo-western populations in developed countries. The experiences of poorer, less educated subpopulations within affluent countries and populations in less developed countries are underreported. The ability of consumers to understand the opportunities and risks of medically assisted reproductive technology is likewise not well described in the literature despite significant technological complexity and evidence that genetic disease may be overrepresented within some disadvantaged population groups. Equity is achieved by identifying barriers and allocating appropriate resources to enable understanding and access. In the case of utilising medically assisted technology, social and power relationships, regulations, and the presumptions of authority figures and policymakers reduce equitable access. Physical or cultural marginalisation from mainstream health services may result in reduced access to genetic and prenatal testing, in-vitro fertilisation and genetic screening of embryos necessary for medically assisted reproduction. Cost and regulatory frameworks can likewise limit opportunities to engage with services. Moreover, the quality of the information provided to prospective users of the technology and how it is received governs understanding of prevention and inhibits adequately informed choice. Best practice care and adequately informed choice can only be achieved by conscientiously attending to these accessibility issues. Deep engagement with at-risk people and critical reflection on mainstream accepted standpoints is required. This paper outlines issues associated with engaging with medically assisted reproduction encountered by Aboriginal families living with Machado-Joseph Disease in some of the most remote areas of Australia. It is the right of these families to access such technologies regardless of where they live. Current barriers to access raise important questions for service providers with implications for practice as new technologies increasingly become part of standard medical care.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Young Aboriginal People's Perspective on Access to Health Care in Remote Australia: Hearing Their Voices
    Warwick, Susannah
    Atkinson, David
    Kitaura, Therese
    LeLievre, Matthew
    Marley, Julia V.
    PROGRESS IN COMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS-RESEARCH EDUCATION AND ACTION, 2019, 13 (02) : 171 - 181
  • [2] Updating the model of eye care for Aboriginal populations in remote Central Australia
    Mitchell, William
    Hassall, Mark
    Henderson, Tim
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 48 (09) : 1299 - 1306
  • [3] Ensuring equity of access to primary health care in rural and remote Australia - what core services should be locally available?
    Thomas, Susan L.
    Wakerman, John
    Humphreys, John S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2015, 14
  • [4] Ensuring equity of access to primary health care in rural and remote Australia - what core services should be locally available?
    Susan L. Thomas
    John Wakerman
    John S. Humphreys
    International Journal for Equity in Health, 14
  • [5] "Just Access"? Questions of Equity in Access and Funding for Assistive Technology
    Durocher, Evelyne
    Wang, Rosalie H.
    Bickenbach, Jerome
    Schreiber, Daphne
    Wilson, Michael G.
    ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 2019, 29 (03) : 172 - 191
  • [6] Hospitalisations for pelvic inflammatory disease in young Aboriginal women living in remote Australia: the role of chlamydia and gonorrhoea
    Causer, Louise
    Liu, Bette
    Watts, Caroline
    McManus, Hamish
    Donovan, Basil
    Ward, James
    Guy, Rebecca
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2022, 98 (06) : 445 - 447
  • [7] Aboriginal yards in remote Australia: Adapting landscapes for indigenous housing
    O'Rourke, Timothy
    Nash, Daphne
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2019, 182 : 124 - 132
  • [8] Living on a fare: Modeling and quantifying the effects of fare budgets on transit access and equity
    Da Silva, Diego
    Klumpenhouwer, Willem
    Karner, Alex
    Robinson, Mitchell
    Liu, Rick
    Shalaby, Amer
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 101
  • [9] Precocious Pregnancy, Sexual Conflict, and Early Childbearing in Remote Aboriginal Australia
    Burbank, Victoria
    Senior, Kate
    McMullen, Sue
    ANTHROPOLOGICAL FORUM, 2015, 25 (03) : 243 - 261
  • [10] What does it cost to provide equity of access to high quality, comprehensive primary health care in rural Australia? A pilot study
    Thomas, S. L.
    Wakerman, J.
    Humphreys, J. S.
    RURAL AND REMOTE HEALTH, 2017, 17 (01):