The system building perspective for building sustainable system configurations using the German energy transition as an example

被引:2
作者
Olbrich, Sarah [1 ]
Bauknecht, Dierk [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Chair Sustainabil & Transit Res, D-79085 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Oeko Inst, Dept Energy & Climate, D-9017 Freiburg, Germany
来源
OXFORD OPEN ENERGY | 2024年 / 3卷
关键词
sustainability transitions; net-zero transitions; transition challenges; system building; energy transitions; LOW-CARBON TRANSITIONS; ELECTRICITY SYSTEM; SOCIOTECHNICAL SYSTEMS; PATH DEPENDENCE; RECONFIGURATION; GOVERNANCE; INNOVATION; POLITICS; TRANSFORMATIONS; TECHNOLOGIES;
D O I
10.1093/ooenergy/oiae010
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
An increasing number of countries employ net-zero decarbonization targets in their climate policies, which requires decarbonizing socio-technical systems like the energy system by mid-century. While there is a high level of agreement about net-zero targets, there remains great uncertainty as to how to meet them. At the same time, the challenges of building a new system that fulfils systemic targets such as net-zero are insufficiently reflected on in the sustainability transitions literature. With the help of a literature review building on theories of socio-technical transitions, this paper introduces system building dimensions that account for the difficulties of net-zero transitions. We identify four such dimensions: (1) competing potential system configurations with different sustainability implications; (2) a broad range of complementary system elements needed; (3) lock-ins and path dependencies in the system building process; and (4) the politics of system building. We offer the German energy transition as an empirical case study to illustrate the relevance of these system building dimensions. Like other countries, Germany agreed in reaching net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by mid-century, which requires decarbonizing the energy system. Despite the agreement of net-zero goals, it is uncertain of how to achieve net-zero. We propose four system building challenges that account for the difficulties of achieving net-zero: (i) competing potential system configurations with different sustainability implications; (ii) a broad range of complementary system elements needed; (iii) lock-ins and path dependencies in the system building process; and (iv) the politics of system building. We use examples from the German energy transition to illustrate the relevance of these system building dimensions. Graphical Abstract
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 94 条
  • [51] Passing the baton: How intermediaries advance sustainability transitions in different phases
    Kivimaa, Paula
    Hyysalo, Sampsa
    Boon, Wouter
    Klerkx, Laurens
    Martiskainen, Mari
    Schot, Johan
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2019, 31 : 110 - 125
  • [52] The role of lock-in mechanisms in transition processes: The case of energy for road transport
    Klitkou, Antje
    Bolwig, Simon
    Hansen, Teis
    Wessberg, Nina
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2015, 16 : 22 - 37
  • [53] Dispatch of Flexibility Options, Grid Infrastructure and Integration of Renewable Energies Within a Decentralized Electricity System Results from Two Scenario Based Research Projects
    Koch, Matthias
    Flachsbarth, Franziska
    Bauknecht, Dierk
    Heinemann, Christoph
    Ritter, David
    Winger, Christian
    Timpe, Christof
    Gandor, Malin
    Klingenberg, Thole
    Troeschel, Martin
    [J]. ADVANCES IN ENERGY SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION, 2017, : 67 - 86
  • [54] An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions
    Koehler, Jonathan
    Geels, Frank W.
    Kern, Florian
    Markard, Jochen
    Onsongo, Elsie
    Wieczorek, Anna
    Alkemade, Floortje
    Avelino, Flor
    Bergek, Anna
    Boons, Frank
    Funfschilling, Lea
    Hess, David
    Holtz, Georg
    Hyysalo, Sampsa
    Jenkins, Kirsten
    Kivimaa, Paula
    Martiskainen, Mari
    McMeekin, Andrew
    Muehlemeier, Marie Susan
    Nykvist, Bjorn
    Pel, Bonno
    Raven, Rob
    Rohracher, Harald
    Sanden, Bjorn
    Schot, Johan
    Sovacool, Benjamin
    Turnheim, Bruno
    Welch, Dan
    Wells, Peter
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2019, 31 : 1 - 32
  • [55] Reconfigurations in sustainability transitions: a systematic and critical review
    Laakso, Senja
    Aro, Riikka
    Heiskanen, Eva
    Kaljonen, Minna
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY-SCIENCE PRACTICE AND POLICY, 2021, 17 (01) : 15 - 31
  • [56] Advocacy coalitions in the acceleration phase of the European energy transition
    Lindberg, Marie Byskov
    Kammermann, Lorenz
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2021, 40 : 262 - 282
  • [57] From institutional work to transition work: Actors creating, maintaining and disrupting transition processes
    Loehr, Meike
    Chlebna, Camilla
    Mattes, Jannika
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2022, 42 : 251 - 267
  • [58] Sustainability Transitions Research: Transforming Science and Practice for Societal Change
    Loorbach, Derk
    Frantzeskaki, Niki
    Avelino, Flor
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, VOL 42, 2017, 42 : 599 - 626
  • [59] Transition Management for Sustainable Development: A Prescriptive, Complexity-Based Governance Framework
    Loorbach, Derk
    [J]. GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLICY ADMINISTRATION AND INSTITUTIONS, 2010, 23 (01): : 161 - 183
  • [60] Markard J, 2023, Routldg Env Sustain, P102, DOI 10.4324/9781003183020-8