Comparison of machine learning models in forecasting different ENSO types

被引:1
作者
Ibebuchi, Chibuike Chiedozie [1 ,2 ]
Rainey, Seth [1 ,2 ]
Obarein, Omon A. [1 ,2 ]
Silva, Alindomar [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Cameron C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Kent State Univ, Dept Geog, Kent, OH 44240 USA
[2] Kent State Univ, ClimRISE Lab, Kent, OH 44240 USA
关键词
El Ni & ntilde; o Southern Oscillation; machine learning; neural networks; forecasting; deep learning; PREDICTION; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1088/1402-4896/ad65c5
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Accurate forecasting of the El Ni & ntilde;o Southern Oscillation (ENSO) plays a critical role in mitigating the impacts of extreme weather conditions linked to ENSO variability on ecosystems. This study evaluates the performance of six machine learning models in forecasting two ENSO types: the Central Pacific El Ni & ntilde;o (Ni & ntilde;o 4 index) and the East Central Pacific El Ni & ntilde;o (Ni & ntilde;o 3.4 index). The models analyzed include the Feed Forward Neural Network (FFNN), Long Short-term Memory (LSTM) neural network, eXtreme Gradient Boosting Regressor, K-Nearest Neighbors Regressor, Gradient Boosting Regressor, and Support Vector Regressor, using the ENSO index lagged by six months as the predictor. The models were trained on the monthly ENSO indices from 1870 to 1992 and tested from 1993 to 2023. We also assess the relative predictability of the two ENSO types. Events were defined as when the ENSO index exceeded +/- 0.4. Our evaluation during the testing period reveals that for the analyzed models, the deep neural network models (LSTM and FFNN) demonstrated superior performance in forecasting ENSO at a 6-month lead time. Furthermore, all models achieved impressive all-season correlations ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 and threat score for the ENSO phases between 0.71 to 0.88 for Ni & ntilde;o 3.4 events, and 0.72 to 0.93 for Ni & ntilde;o 4 events. The predictability of the two ENSO types depended on the model and strength of the ENSO event. Considering both ENSO phases, La Ni & ntilde;a events were forecasted with a higher accuracy relative to El Ni & ntilde;o events, and all models, besides the deep learning models, notably fell short in capturing the extreme 2015/2016 Central Pacific El Ni & ntilde;o event. These results highlight the potential of machine learning models, particularly the deep learning approaches, for skillful ENSO forecasting, by leveraging its historical data.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] Abadi M, 2016, PROCEEDINGS OF OSDI'16: 12TH USENIX SYMPOSIUM ON OPERATING SYSTEMS DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION, P265
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2024, DOLLAR GENERAL
  • [3] El Nino Modoki and its possible teleconnection
    Ashok, Karumuri
    Behera, Swadhin K.
    Rao, Suryachandra A.
    Weng, Hengyi
    Yamagata, Toshio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2007, 112 (C11)
  • [4] Atanasovski M, 2020, 2020 55TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION, COMMUNICATION AND ENERGY SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES (IEEE ICEST 2020), P110, DOI [10.1109/icest49890.2020.9232768, 10.1109/ICEST49890.2020.9232768]
  • [5] A gradient boosting approach to the Kaggle load forecasting competition
    Ben Taieb, Souhaib
    Hyndman, Rob J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2014, 30 (02) : 382 - 394
  • [6] AWNN-Assisted Wind Power Forecasting Using Feed-Forward Neural Network
    Bhaskar, Kanna
    Singh, S. N.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2012, 3 (02) : 306 - 315
  • [7] Brown DA, 2024, ROUT HBK APPL ETHICS, P136, DOI 10.4324/9781003039860-16
  • [8] Changing El Nino-Southern Oscillation in a warming climate
    Cai, Wenju
    Santoso, Agus
    Collins, Matthew
    Dewitte, Boris
    Karamperidou, Christina
    Kug, Jong-Seong
    Lengaigne, Matthieu
    McPhaden, Michael J.
    Stuecker, Malte F.
    Taschetto, Andrea S.
    Timmermann, Axel
    Wu, Lixin
    Yeh, Sang-Wook
    Wang, Guojian
    Ng, Benjamin
    Jia, Fan
    Yang, Yun
    Ying, Jun
    Zheng, Xiao-Tong
    Bayr, Tobias
    Brown, Josephine R.
    Capotondi, Antonietta
    Cobb, Kim M.
    Gan, Bolan
    Geng, Tao
    Ham, Yoo-Geun
    Jin, Fei-Fei
    Jo, Hyun-Su
    Li, Xichen
    Lin, Xiaopei
    McGregor, Shayne
    Park, Jae-Heung
    Stein, Karl
    Yang, Kai
    Zhang, Li
    Zhong, Wenxiu
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 2 (09) : 628 - 644
  • [9] Climate processes and drivers in the Pacific and global warming: a review for informing Pacific planning agencies
    Chand, Savin
    Power, Scott
    Walsh, Kevin
    Holbrook, Neil
    McInnes, Kathleen
    Tory, Kevin
    Ramsay, Hamish
    Hoeke, Ron
    Kiem, Anthony S.
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2023, 176 (02)
  • [10] El Nino and La Nina asymmetry in short-term predictability on springtime initial condition
    Chen, Hui
    Jin, Yishuai
    Shen, Xingchen
    Lin, Xiaopei
    Hu, Ruikun
    [J]. NPJ CLIMATE AND ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE, 2023, 6 (01)