Artificial intelligence uncertainty quantification in radiotherapy applications - A scoping review

被引:1
|
作者
Wahid, Kareem A. [1 ,2 ]
Kaffey, Zaphanlene Y. [2 ]
Farris, David P. [3 ]
Humbert-Vidan, Laia [2 ]
Moreno, Amy C. [2 ]
Rasmussen, Mathis [4 ]
Rend, Jintao [4 ]
Naser, Mohamed A. [2 ]
Netherton, Tucker J. [5 ]
Korreman, Stine [4 ]
Balakrishnan, Guha [6 ]
Fuller, Clifton D. [2 ]
Fuentes, David [1 ]
Dohopolski, Michael J. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Imaging Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Res Med Lib, Houston, TX USA
[4] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Aarhus, Denmark
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Houston, TX USA
[6] Rice Univ, Houston, TX USA
[7] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Radiat Oncol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
AUTOMATIC SEGMENTATION; DEEP; PREDICTION; ENSEMBLE; NETWORK; MODELS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110542
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background/purpose: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiotherapy (RT) is expanding rapidly. However, there exists a notable lack of clinician trust in AI models, underscoring the need for effective uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods. The purpose of this study was to scope existing literature related to UQ in RT, identify areas of improvement, and determine future directions. Methods: We followed the PRISMA-ScR scoping review reporting guidelines. We utilized the population (human cancer patients), concept (utilization of AI UQ), context (radiotherapy applications) framework to structure our search and screening process. We conducted a systematic search spanning seven databases, supplemented by manual curation, up to January 2024. Our search yielded a total of 8980 articles for initial review. Manuscript screening and data extraction was performed in Covidence. Data extraction categories included general study characteristics, RT characteristics, AI characteristics, and UQ characteristics. Results: We identified 56 articles published from 2015 to 2024. 10 domains of RT applications were represented; most studies evaluated auto-contouring (50 %), followed by image-synthesis (13 %), and multiple applications simultaneously (11 %). 12 disease sites were represented, with head and neck cancer being the most common disease site independent of application space (32 %). Imaging data was used in 91 % of studies, while only 13 % incorporated RT dose information. Most studies focused on failure detection as the main application of UQ (60 %), with Monte Carlo dropout being the most commonly implemented UQ method (32 %) followed by ensembling (16 %). 55 % of studies did not share code or datasets. Conclusion: Our review revealed a lack of diversity in UQ for RT applications beyond auto-contouring. Moreover, we identified a clear need to study additional UQ methods, such as conformal prediction. Our results may incentivize the development of guidelines for reporting and implementation of UQ in RT.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Recent Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Radiotherapy: Where We Are and Beyond
    Santoro, Miriam
    Strolin, Silvia
    Paolani, Giulia
    Della Gala, Giuseppe
    Bartoloni, Alessandro
    Giacometti, Cinzia
    Ammendolia, Ilario
    Morganti, Alessio Giuseppe
    Strigari, Lidia
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (07):
  • [42] Harnessing Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Global Breast Cancer Care: A Scoping Review of Applications, Outcomes, and Challenges
    Chia, Jolene Li Ling
    He, George Shiyao
    Ngiam, Kee Yuen
    Hartman, Mikael
    Ng, Qin Xiang
    Goh, Serene Si Ning
    CANCERS, 2025, 17 (02)
  • [43] Current status of artificial intelligence methods for skin cancer survival analysis: a scoping review
    Schreidah, Celine M.
    Gordon, Emily R.
    Adeuyan, Oluwaseyi
    Chen, Caroline
    Lapolla, Brigit A.
    Kent, Joshua A.
    Reynolds, George Bingham
    Fahmy, Lauren M.
    Weng, Chunhua
    Tatonetti, Nicholas P.
    Chase, Herbert S.
    Pe'er, Itsik
    Geskin, Larisa J.
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [44] Enhancing Radiotherapy Workflow for Head and Neck Cancer with Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review
    Franzese, Ciro
    Dei, Damiano
    Lambri, Nicola
    Teriaca, Maria Ausilia
    Badalamenti, Marco
    Crespi, Leonardo
    Tomatis, Stefano
    Loiacono, Daniele
    Mancosu, Pietro
    Scorsetti, Marta
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (06):
  • [45] Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cataract Surgery: A Review
    Ahuja, Abhimanyu S.
    Paredes III, Alfredo A. Paredes
    Eisel, Mallory L. S.
    Kodwani, Sejal
    Wagner, Isabella, V
    Miller, Darby
    Dorairaj, Syril
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 18 : 2969 - 2975
  • [46] A review of artificial intelligence applications in in vitro fertilization
    Zhang, Qing
    Liang, Xiaowen
    Chen, Zhiyi
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2025, 42 (01) : 3 - 14
  • [47] Applications of artificial intelligence for membrane separation: A review
    Jafari, Mehryar
    Tzirtzipi, Christina
    Castro-Dominguez, Bernardo
    JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2024, 68
  • [48] Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Vasculitides: A Systematic Review
    Omar, Mahmud
    Agbareia, Reem
    Naffaa, Mohammad E.
    Watad, Abdulla
    Glicksberg, Benjamin S.
    Nadkarni, Girish N.
    Klang, Eyal
    ACR OPEN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2025, 7 (03)
  • [49] A review of artificial intelligence applications for antimicrobial resistance
    Lv, Ji
    Deng, Senyi
    Zhang, Le
    BIOSAFETY AND HEALTH, 2021, 3 (01) : 22 - 31
  • [50] A Review on Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Wastewater Treatment
    Wang, Yi
    Cheng, Yuhan
    Liu, He
    Guo, Qing
    Dai, Chuanjun
    Zhao, Min
    Liu, Dezhao
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (18)