Artificial intelligence uncertainty quantification in radiotherapy applications - A scoping review

被引:1
|
作者
Wahid, Kareem A. [1 ,2 ]
Kaffey, Zaphanlene Y. [2 ]
Farris, David P. [3 ]
Humbert-Vidan, Laia [2 ]
Moreno, Amy C. [2 ]
Rasmussen, Mathis [4 ]
Rend, Jintao [4 ]
Naser, Mohamed A. [2 ]
Netherton, Tucker J. [5 ]
Korreman, Stine [4 ]
Balakrishnan, Guha [6 ]
Fuller, Clifton D. [2 ]
Fuentes, David [1 ]
Dohopolski, Michael J. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Imaging Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Res Med Lib, Houston, TX USA
[4] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Aarhus, Denmark
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Houston, TX USA
[6] Rice Univ, Houston, TX USA
[7] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Radiat Oncol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
AUTOMATIC SEGMENTATION; DEEP; PREDICTION; ENSEMBLE; NETWORK; MODELS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110542
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background/purpose: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiotherapy (RT) is expanding rapidly. However, there exists a notable lack of clinician trust in AI models, underscoring the need for effective uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods. The purpose of this study was to scope existing literature related to UQ in RT, identify areas of improvement, and determine future directions. Methods: We followed the PRISMA-ScR scoping review reporting guidelines. We utilized the population (human cancer patients), concept (utilization of AI UQ), context (radiotherapy applications) framework to structure our search and screening process. We conducted a systematic search spanning seven databases, supplemented by manual curation, up to January 2024. Our search yielded a total of 8980 articles for initial review. Manuscript screening and data extraction was performed in Covidence. Data extraction categories included general study characteristics, RT characteristics, AI characteristics, and UQ characteristics. Results: We identified 56 articles published from 2015 to 2024. 10 domains of RT applications were represented; most studies evaluated auto-contouring (50 %), followed by image-synthesis (13 %), and multiple applications simultaneously (11 %). 12 disease sites were represented, with head and neck cancer being the most common disease site independent of application space (32 %). Imaging data was used in 91 % of studies, while only 13 % incorporated RT dose information. Most studies focused on failure detection as the main application of UQ (60 %), with Monte Carlo dropout being the most commonly implemented UQ method (32 %) followed by ensembling (16 %). 55 % of studies did not share code or datasets. Conclusion: Our review revealed a lack of diversity in UQ for RT applications beyond auto-contouring. Moreover, we identified a clear need to study additional UQ methods, such as conformal prediction. Our results may incentivize the development of guidelines for reporting and implementation of UQ in RT.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Artificial Intelligence Based on Machine Learning in Pharmacovigilance: A Scoping Review
    Kompa, Benjamin
    Hakim, Joe B.
    Palepu, Anil
    Kompa, Kathryn Grace
    Smith, Michael
    Bain, Paul A.
    Woloszynek, Stephen
    Painter, Jeffery L.
    Bate, Andrew
    Beam, Andrew L.
    DRUG SAFETY, 2022, 45 (05) : 477 - 491
  • [32] Application of artificial intelligence in dental implant prognosis: A scoping review
    Wu, Ziang
    Yu, Xinbo
    Wang, Feng
    Xu, Chun
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 144
  • [33] Exploring the roles of artificial intelligence in surgical education: A scoping review
    Bilgic, Elif
    Gorgy, Andrew
    Yang, Alison
    Cwintal, Michelle
    Ranjbar, Hamed
    Kahla, Kalin
    Reddy, Dheeksha
    Li, Kexin
    Ozturk, Helin
    Zimmermann, Eric
    Quaiattini, Andrea
    Abbasgholizadeh-Rahimi, Samira
    Poenaru, Dan
    Harley, Jason M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 224 (01) : 205 - 216
  • [34] A decade's overview of artificial intelligence in diagnosing: a scoping review
    Balakrishnan, Vimala
    Rustamov, Zahiriddin
    Ramanathan, Ghayathri
    Lim, Jia Leng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, 2024, : 3131 - 3148
  • [35] The Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Breast Cancer Diagnosis
    Ozsahin, Dilber Uzun
    Emegano, Declan Ikechukwu
    Uzun, Berna
    Ozsahin, Ilker
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [36] Review Artificial Intelligence Applications in Renewable Energy Systems Integration
    Bishaw, Faisal Ghazi
    Ishak, Mohamad Khairi
    Atyia, Thamir Hassan
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS, 2024, 20 (03) : 566 - 582
  • [37] Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Management of Male Infertility, a Scoping Review
    Naik, Noopur
    Roth, Bradley
    Lundy, Scott D.
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2025, 26 (01)
  • [39] Artificial intelligence in radiotherapy
    Li, Guangqi
    Wu, Xin
    Ma, Xuelei
    SEMINARS IN CANCER BIOLOGY, 2022, 86 : 160 - 171
  • [40] Applications of artificial intelligence and deep learning in molecular imaging and radiotherapy
    Arabi, Hossein
    Zaidi, Habib
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HYBRID IMAGING, 2020, 4 (01):