Artificial intelligence uncertainty quantification in radiotherapy applications - A scoping review

被引:1
|
作者
Wahid, Kareem A. [1 ,2 ]
Kaffey, Zaphanlene Y. [2 ]
Farris, David P. [3 ]
Humbert-Vidan, Laia [2 ]
Moreno, Amy C. [2 ]
Rasmussen, Mathis [4 ]
Rend, Jintao [4 ]
Naser, Mohamed A. [2 ]
Netherton, Tucker J. [5 ]
Korreman, Stine [4 ]
Balakrishnan, Guha [6 ]
Fuller, Clifton D. [2 ]
Fuentes, David [1 ]
Dohopolski, Michael J. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Imaging Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Res Med Lib, Houston, TX USA
[4] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Aarhus, Denmark
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Houston, TX USA
[6] Rice Univ, Houston, TX USA
[7] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Radiat Oncol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
AUTOMATIC SEGMENTATION; DEEP; PREDICTION; ENSEMBLE; NETWORK; MODELS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110542
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background/purpose: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiotherapy (RT) is expanding rapidly. However, there exists a notable lack of clinician trust in AI models, underscoring the need for effective uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods. The purpose of this study was to scope existing literature related to UQ in RT, identify areas of improvement, and determine future directions. Methods: We followed the PRISMA-ScR scoping review reporting guidelines. We utilized the population (human cancer patients), concept (utilization of AI UQ), context (radiotherapy applications) framework to structure our search and screening process. We conducted a systematic search spanning seven databases, supplemented by manual curation, up to January 2024. Our search yielded a total of 8980 articles for initial review. Manuscript screening and data extraction was performed in Covidence. Data extraction categories included general study characteristics, RT characteristics, AI characteristics, and UQ characteristics. Results: We identified 56 articles published from 2015 to 2024. 10 domains of RT applications were represented; most studies evaluated auto-contouring (50 %), followed by image-synthesis (13 %), and multiple applications simultaneously (11 %). 12 disease sites were represented, with head and neck cancer being the most common disease site independent of application space (32 %). Imaging data was used in 91 % of studies, while only 13 % incorporated RT dose information. Most studies focused on failure detection as the main application of UQ (60 %), with Monte Carlo dropout being the most commonly implemented UQ method (32 %) followed by ensembling (16 %). 55 % of studies did not share code or datasets. Conclusion: Our review revealed a lack of diversity in UQ for RT applications beyond auto-contouring. Moreover, we identified a clear need to study additional UQ methods, such as conformal prediction. Our results may incentivize the development of guidelines for reporting and implementation of UQ in RT.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Application of Artificial Intelligence in Spine Surgery: A Scoping Review
    Shi, Liangyu
    Wang, Hongfei
    Shea, Graham Ka-Hon
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS GLOBAL RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2025, 9 (04):
  • [22] Gut microbiota and artificial intelligence approaches: A scoping review
    Iadanza, Ernesto
    Fabbri, Rachele
    Basic-CiCak, Dzana
    Amedei, Amedeo
    Telalovic, Jasminka Hasic
    HEALTH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 10 (06) : 1343 - 1358
  • [23] Artificial intelligence in the practice of forensic medicine: a scoping review
    Tournois, Laurent
    Trousset, Victor
    Hatsch, Didier
    Delabarde, Tania
    Ludes, Bertrand
    Lefevre, Thomas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEGAL MEDICINE, 2024, 138 (03) : 1023 - 1037
  • [24] Applications of artificial intelligence in engineering and manufacturing: a systematic review
    Nti, Isaac Kofi
    Adekoya, Adebayo Felix
    Weyori, Benjamin Asubam
    Nyarko-Boateng, Owusu
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2022, 33 (06) : 1581 - 1601
  • [25] A Review on Interpretable and Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Hydroclimatic Applications
    Basagaoglu, Hakan
    Chakraborty, Debaditya
    Do Lago, Cesar
    Gutierrez, Lilianna
    Sahinli, Mehmet Arif
    Giacomoni, Marcio
    Furl, Chad
    Mirchi, Ali
    Moriasi, Daniel
    Sengor, Sema Sevinc
    WATER, 2022, 14 (08)
  • [26] Artificial intelligence applications in the football codes: A systematic review
    Elstak, Isaiah
    Salmon, Paul
    Mclean, Scott
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2024, 42 (13) : 1184 - 1199
  • [27] Applications of contemporary artificial intelligence technology in forensic odontology as primary forensic identifier: A scoping review
    Mohammad, Norhasmira
    Ahmad, Rohana
    Kurniawan, Arofi
    Yusof, Mohd Yusmiaidil Putera Mohd
    FRONTIERS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2022, 5
  • [28] Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture: A Review
    Eli-Chukwu, Ngozi Clara
    ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY & APPLIED SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2019, 9 (04) : 4377 - 4383
  • [29] Unveiling the role of artificial intelligence applied to clear aligner therapy: A scoping review
    Ruiz, Debora Costa
    Muresanu, Sorana
    Du, Xijin
    Elgarba, Bahaaeldeen M.
    Fontenele, Rocharles Cavalcante
    Jacobs, Reinhilde
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2025, 154
  • [30] Current status of artificial intelligence technologies in pituitary adenoma surgery: a scoping review
    Maroufi, Seyed Farzad
    Dogruel, Yuecel
    Pour-Rashidi, Ahmad
    Kohli, Gurkirat S.
    Parker, Colson Tomberlin
    Uchida, Tatsuya
    Asfour, Mohamed Z.
    Martin, Clara
    Nizzola, Mariagrazia
    De Bonis, Alessandro
    Tawfik-Helika, Mamdouh
    Tavallai, Amin
    Cohen-Gadol, Aaron A.
    Palmisciano, Paolo
    PITUITARY, 2024, 27 (02) : 91 - 128