Proposing an ethics of care: Tracing Victoria's transport planning history

被引:1
作者
Legacy, Crystal [1 ]
Clements, Rebecca [2 ]
Woodcock, Ian [2 ]
Whitten, James [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
关键词
ethics; ethics of care; governance; infrastructure; transport planning; transport politics; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1111/1745-5871.12663
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
This paper examines the question what kind of ethics prevail in contemporary urban transport planning and what potential does an ethics of care hold for practice? Researchers have given ample attention to the need for better governance and coordination, and despite acknowledging the need to reduce reliance on private cars, little has been said by them about what ethics can or should guide planning to bring about such frameworks for caring. This area of research merits urgent work given our collective need to address the socio-spatial, climate, and health impacts of car dependence. Taking as our focus transport planning in Victoria, Australia, we consider how an ethics of care could open new ways to redress how transport planning has perpetuated injustices in metropolitan Melbourne. We draw on secondary research to consider both the conditions that cultivated the current transport planning landscape and pathways for possible change that lie ahead. The research highlights opportunities to consider care as an ethical framework for transport planning that could amplify justice and equity claims in urban transport planning for Australian cities and that has salience for other cities elsewhere. This paper explores the potential for an ethics of care to guide transport planning through an examination of Victoria, Australia. It opens the discussion for an alternative transport planning practice that is grounded in deliberative dialogue between diverse stakeholders who possess different perspectives of the transport challenge. image
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 401
页数:13
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Rethinking care as alternate infrastructure [J].
Alam, Ashraful ;
Houston, Donna .
CITIES, 2020, 100
[2]   Infrastructure Governance in Times of Crises: A Research Agenda for Australian Cities [J].
Alizadeh, Tooran ;
Clements, Rebecca ;
Legacy, Crystal ;
Searle, Glen ;
Kamruzzaman, Md .
URBAN POLICY AND RESEARCH, 2022, 40 (01) :1-14
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, view, V126, P171
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1992, The moral dimensions of public policy choice: Beyond the market paradigm, DOI DOI 10.2307/JJ.9561387.9
[5]   The Need for Greater Transparency When Assessing the Performance and Prospects of Melbourne's Rail Franchise Contracts [J].
Ashmore, David Patrick ;
Stone, John ;
Kirk, Yvonne .
URBAN POLICY AND RESEARCH, 2019, 37 (01) :82-96
[6]  
Bergmann Sigurd., 2008, The Ethics of Mobilities: Rethinking Place, Exclusion, Freedom and Environment, P13
[7]  
Berry M., 2017, MORALITY POWER ETHIC, DOI [10.4337/9781786435569, DOI 10.4337/9781786435569]
[8]  
Bonde S., 2013, A framework for making ethical decisions
[9]  
Buxton M., 2016, PLANNING MELBOURNE L, DOI [10.1071/9780643104730, DOI 10.1071/9780643104730]
[10]  
Campbell H., 2002, PLAN THEOR, V1, P163, DOI [DOI 10.1177/147309520200100205, 10.1177/147309520200100205]